Tag Archives: Donald Trump

As Trump hosts crypto gala, experts continue to raise conflict of interest concerns

When President Trump’s new tariffs started throttling freight traffic, the leader of trucking logistics firm Freight Technologies used an unorthodox method to try and get the president’s attention. 

The California-based firm purchased $2 million worth of Trump Coin, the signature cryptocurrency backed by Mr. Trump. The president and his family launched Trump Coin days before he took office in January. Anyone can buy the cryptocurrency. An analytics firm says Mr. Trump’s family and other backers have collected more than $300 million in transaction fees so far.  

Donald Quinby, Freight Technologies’ chief financial officer, told CBS News that the purchase seemed like “really the best platform for us to make a splash, to make some noise.” 

“With the Trump meme token, this was just an opportunity to really advocate for free and fair trade,” Quinby said. “I’m sure he likes to follow who’s purchasing his coins.” 

In April, the Trump family announced an “intimate private dinner” with the president at Mr. Trump’s golf course in Virginia to reward the biggest buyers of Trump Coin, or $TRUMP. A leaderboard was created so buyers could compete with one another. Buyers eventually spent $140 million trying to secure access to the event, according to data analytics firm Inca Digital. 

A message on the $TRUMP leaderboard. 

trumpdinner.gettrumpmemes.com


Some of the 220 leading buyers of $TRUMP received tickets to attend the dinner. Mr. Trump will also host a smaller reception for the token’s top 25 holders. The guests are beneficiaries of a new opportunity to gain access and potential influence in a city with a long history of blending money and politics, experts said.

“This is really unprecedented,” said Jessica Tillipman, a George Washington University law professor. “This appears to be a president that could be potentially benefiting privately from something that he’s doing out in the open.”

The White House pushed back hard on the notion that the gala dinner or the president’s role in promoting the cryptocurrency crossed any ethical lines. Administration officials said they had not approved an initial plan suggesting top buyers of the meme coin product would receive a White House tour.

“This is a personal dinner that the president is attending on his personal time,” a White House official told CBS News in a statement. “The White House has absolutely nothing to do with it.”

Trump rewards cryptocurrency buyers

Meme coins are a type of cryptocurrency whose value is largely driven by social media buzz. They are not usually used in transactions, and are known for erratic price shifts. $TRUMP peaked at around $75 shortly after launch and plummeted to under $8 by April 2025, but soared in value after the dinner with Mr. Trump was announced. 

Among the attendees of Thursday’s dinner is Justin Sun, a Chinese-born crypto billionaire and the largest holder of Trump Coin. Sun has a net worth of $8.5 billion, according to Forbes, and is best known for creating the Tron blockchain. He was also the buyer who paid $6.2 million for a banana duct-taped to a wall by artist Maurizio Cattelan. Sun promptly ate the fruit. 

Sun was sued for fraud by the Biden administration for allegedly “fraudulently manipulating the secondary market” and paying celebrities to promote a crypto token his company created “without disclosing their compensation.” Earlier this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission paused the lawsuit as part of a broader Trump administration shift toward easing crypto enforcement

Justin Sun, founder of TRON, speaks at the Milken Institute Asia Summit in Singapore, on Thursday, Sept. 29, 2022. The event started with invitation only sessions on Sept. 28, runs through September 30. Photographer: Bryan van der Beek/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg


Sun also said his firm has invested tens of millions in the Trump-linked World Liberty Financial. But the anonymous nature of cryptocurrency allows Sun, and other foreign buyers like him, to court access to power with little transparency. 

“It’s almost like the perfect kind of opaque structure for any type of foreign government or, you know, non-U.S. citizens who wanted to try to seek favor, curry favor with this particular administration,” Tillipman said. 

Experts raise concerns about conflicts of interest 

Tillipman compared the Trump family’s foray into cryptocurrency to Hunter Biden’s art sales during his father’s administration.

“The argument was that [purchasers of Hunter Biden’s artwork] could use it to influence” then-President Joe Biden, she said.

Like cryptocurrency, “a lot of these types of transactions are by nature opaque because you don’t know who’s purchasing it. You don’t know who the buyer is,” Tillipman said. She noted that in effect, the Biden administration tried to distance the president from the transactions by saying information about the buyers and transactions would be kept secret by the gallery owner.

Nonetheless, she said “there were a lot of legitimate concerns associated with that particular dealing, as there was fear that it could be a back door to President Biden” through a family member. 

“The difference here is just the order of magnitude and the involvement of the president himself,” Tillipman said. Hunter Biden’s art netted him about $1.5 million by the end of his father’s presidency, compared to the potentially far more lucrative Trump family crypto business.

Mr. Trump has previously vowed on social media to “make sure the U.S. is the Crypto Capital of the World.” He and his eldest sons are also backing the crypto exchange World Liberty Financial, and cryptocurrency makes up about $2.9 billion of Mr. Trump’s net worth, according to a recent report



Trump-linked crypto firm raises concerns about possible conflicts of interest

03:22

On Monday, the Senate advanced the GENIUS Act, which would regulate stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency that is linked to the value of an asset like the U.S. dollar or gold. They tend to have fewer price fluctuations than meme coins, but allow for the same opacity in transactions. Some Democrats pushed back against the bill, citing Mr. Trump’s crypto holdings and calling for anti-corruption rules. 

“This is corruption out in the open,” said Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, on Thursday. “The GENIUS Act will supercharge Donald Trump’s ability to collect money from anybody who is seeking pardon, who wants tariff relief, who wants a criminal prosecution dropped.” 

The White House has dismissed criticisms that Mr. Trump’s support for the crypto sector represents a conflict of interest. 

“All of the president’s assets are in a blind trust, which is managed by his children, and I would argue, one of the many reasons that the American people reelected this president back to this office is because he was a very successful businessman before giving it up to publicly serve our country,” press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a briefing Thursday. 

Quinby found that buying the meme coin didn’t immediately result in access to the president. Freight Technologies didn’t make it to the leaderboard, but they are prepared to keep spending. The trucking company reported in public securities filings that their investment in $TRUMP could eventually reach $20 million, if that’s what it takes to get Mr. Trump’s attention. Even if they lose money on the market, Quinby thinks it was worth the risk. 

“We thought the ability for us to get out there and advocate for the fair and free trade, we thought it was worth it,” Quinby said. 

Source link

Democrats push to strip Trump of authority over police agency that protects judges — as threats against judges surge

Amid a surge in threats against federal judges, Senate Democrats will formally introduce legislation Thursday to transfer control of the U.S. Marshals Service to the court system itself. 

The legislation, which was obtained by CBS News, specifies that the presidential administration would lose its authority over the Marshals. The law enforcement agency is currently part of the Department of Justice, and among other things, it is tasked with protecting federal judges, courthouses and court workers.

Sen. Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat who is leading the effort, said the change would help insulate U.S. Marshals from possible interference and politicization by the Trump administration. 

Democrats have accused President Trump of endangering the judiciary by publicly denouncing judges and their rulings on social media. The president’s critics have also accused the administration of attempting to defy court orders and undermine the courts.

Booker said, “Since 1789, the U.S. Marshals have valiantly protected our nation’s judges and enforced court orders. But their dual accountability to the executive branch and the judicial branch paves the way toward a constitutional crisis.”

“To ensure these necessary functions are carried out, Congress must act to move the bureau into the judicial branch. Our U.S. Marshals are critical to protecting the rule of law, and they must be able to do their jobs without political interference,” Booker said.

Under the legislation, which is expected to be unveiled Thursday morning, the federal government would launch a U.S. Marshals Board, which would include the chief justice of the Supreme Court and other members of the Judicial Conference, a committee made up of judges. 

The proposal would authorize the chief justice to consult with the board and select a U.S. Marshals Service director and U.S Marshals for each of the country’s dozens of judicial districts.

The White House has denied accusations that the president has defied court orders. In a press briefing in March, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “We will continue to comply with these court orders.”

Mr. Trump has publicly lashed out at judges who have ruled against him, calling for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg — who is overseeing a controversial immigration case — along with other judges the president claims are “crooked.” Leavitt said in March, “It’s incumbent on the Supreme Court to reign in these activist judges.”

“We’ve seen threats against judges escalate as the president has threatened impeachment of those who rule against him,” said Sen. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat.  

Schiff also noted the Trump administration has stripped some former federal officials of their government security details, including Mr. Trump’s former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary Mark Esper.

“The U.S. Marshals are central to preserving our democracy and upholding the rule of law. Marshals must be able to protect all judges, enforce all court orders and have the independence necessary to do their jobs,” said Schiff.

U.S. Marshals deal with surge in threats against judges

U.S. Marshals provide direct protection for federal judges and investigate threats against the judiciary. Marshals responded when a California man was charged in 2022 with an assassination attempt against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Agency reports show threat investigations by the U.S. Marshals Service, which provides security to federal judges and prosecutors, nearly tripled from 2019 to 2023.

Federal judges in Washington, D.C., described a wave of threats against them during the prosecutions of approximately 1,600 cases from the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol siege.   

A Texas woman was charged with making racist death threats against U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in the days after Chutkan was assigned Mr. Trump’s federal criminal case in Washington, D.C., tied to efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.

Marshals have also investigated a recent wave of doxxing incidents that targeted federal judges at their homes. In about two dozen cases nationwide, judges have gotten unsolicited pizza deliveries with the recipient listed as Daniel Anderl, the late son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, the New Jersey judge told CBS News. Anderl was killed at the family’s New Jersey home in 2020 by a disgruntled gunman who was targeting Salas.

Congressional Democrats who support the legislation to shift control of the U.S. Marshals Service include the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland. The legislation could face long odds in a GOP-controlled Congress, though.

Source link

How the Louvre Abu Dhabi’s Museographic Approach and the UAE’s Soft Power Strategy Line Up

In recent years, institutions worldwide have begun to reexamine their permanent collections and curatorial displays, reconsidering how these frame and narrate art history and the evolution of civilization. No museum operates as a truly neutral entity—each institution shapes how we perceive art history and society’s larger cultural dynamics. Confronting longstanding questions of representation, inclusivity and power embedded in traditional narratives, museums are adopting new approaches to collecting, operations and promotion that are more fluid and critically engaged. Once presented through static and crystallized frameworks, art and artifacts on display may be rotated in or out of exhibitions, recontextualized via placard texts or even returned to their country of origin in the service of more pluralistic, multilayered and equitable presentations of global art and cultural histories.

The museographic strategy adopted by the Louvre Abu Dhabi, which opened in 2017 in the U.A.E., is particularly revealing in how it aligns with the country’s broader political agenda, both in terms of cultural diplomacy and domestic and international policy. Indeed, the museum is staging what may be an unprecedented museographic proposition: a synchronically intercultural narrative of civilization’s development, tracing how artistic, spiritual and scientific breakthroughs unfolded in parallel across disparate regions of the world.

Designed by Jean Nouvel, Louvre Abu Dhabi emerges from the sea like a mirage. © Department of Culture and Tourism – Abu Dhabi / Photo Yiorgis Yerolymbos

French architect Jean Nouvel’s tour de force rises with deliberate spectacle along the waterfront of the emerging cultural district on Saadiyat Island, soon to host a lineup of equally spectacular buildings: the Guggenheim Abu Dhabi, the Zayed National Museum, the Natural History Museum—all currently under construction—and teamLab Phenomena Abu Dhabi, the immersive digital museum by the Japanese collective teamLab, which opened just last week. It sits less than a ten-minute drive from some of the most beautiful and luxurious resorts recently built along the island’s white-sand beaches and clear-water shoreline, with many more still on the way.

Emerging from the turquoise waters like a mirage with luminous white volumes, Nouvel reimagined the museum not as a singular monument but as a porous city of knowledge—open, fluid and in dialogue with its surroundings. Inspired by traditional Arab medinas and low-lying desert settlements, the building appears to hover above the waterline, establishing a visual and conceptual continuity with Arabic heritage and aesthetic traditions. Its crowning architectural gesture—a 180-meter-wide dome composed of eight interlocking layers of steel and aluminum latticework—casts a mesmerizing “rain of light,” echoing the dappled sunlight of an oasis palm grove while invoking the transcendental role of geometric abstraction in Islamic art as a non-figurative pathway to the divine.

Composed of eight interwoven layers of geometric latticework, a dome produces the museum’s signature “rain of light.” Godong/ Universal Images Group via Getty Images

While the Louvre in Paris—like the British Museum or the Metropolitan Museum of Art—continues isolating and compartmentalizing cultures into distinct zones, one encounters a strikingly different logic here. Gold funerary masks from Peru (100 BCE-700 BCE), the Philippines (900-1200) and Lebanon (600-800 BCE) are in a shared vitrine; representations of motherhood from the Ivory Coast, Egypt and France sit side by side; and funerary objects from Oceania, China and France appear in direct dialogue.

Other vitrines trace the migration of decorative and symbolic motifs across continents, shaped by trade, imitation and adaptation into the visual vocabularies of receiving cultures. Patterns from Chinese blue-and-white porcelain were reimagined in Iznik (the epicenter of ceramic production in the Ottoman Empire), fused with floral motifs inspired by Istanbul’s gardens. In Venice, these same designs were reinterpreted through Italian Mannerism’s lens, absorbing the local tradition’s colors and ornamental language.

As visitors move through the exhibition—and along the arc of civilization—a resonant curatorial juxtaposition appears: a medieval statue of the Virgin Mary with child stands in alignment with turquoise tiles bearing Quranic verses and an ancient Buddha sculpture. Positioned on a single axis, these objects reveal how, nearly 2,000 years ago, the rise of universal religions unfolded almost simultaneously across Europe, Asia and Africa. “By addressing their message to all humanity without distinction, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam transcended local cultural characteristics and deeply transformed ancient societies,” reads the wall text, underscoring how the spread of belief systems, far from being solely defined by conflict, also created spaces of mutual influence and shared transformation.

Gold funerary masks from Peru, Bhutan and the Philippines are displayed together. Photo: Elisa Carollo for Observer

The climax of these cross-cultural curatorial pairings arguably arrives near the end of the exhibition. In the contemporary section, a dialogue unfolds between a futuristic sculpture by Marcel Duchamp, a 19th-century ceremonial dance paddle from the Rapa Nui culture of Chile and a curvilinear headdress shaped like a snake from the Nalu or Baga culture in Guinea (dated between 1800 and 1940). Together, they reveal the extent to which Modernism owes its visual language to non-Western cultures, particularly in its synthetic treatment of the human form, reduced to pure line and formal essence, as seen in ritualistic and totemic artifacts.

In the final room, Cy Twombly’s pseudo-script and Willem de Kooning’s gestural abstraction channel the same primal need to leave a mark that pulses through time in the imaginative figures carved into rock faces by Arabian shepherds over 4,000 years ago—presented here in direct visual dialogue. As this across-time exchange between picture and script unfolds, a vessel painted by Keith Haring, covered in hieroglyphic-like humanoid figures, mirrors that same impulse: a drive to invent a visual language of pictograms and symbols that predate formal writing systems, springing instead from raw expression and emotional charge.

Although the curatorial parallels may at times stretch the viewer’s suspension of disbelief, the underlying message resonates clearly: human development follows a shared trajectory, with civilizations across geographies arriving at similar breakthroughs in tandem—each shaped, expanded and deepened by the ongoing flow of cross-cultural exchange.

Cy Twombly’s paintings are juxtaposed with 4,000-year-old engravings by Arabian shepherds. Photo: Elisa Carollo for Observer

As with MASP in São Paulo, the Louvre Abu Dhabi likewise embraces transparency in its display strategies, allowing for a layered interplay of artifacts, cultural narratives and aesthetic vocabularies that enables synchronic dialogues across time and geography. Here, objects are not isolated but visually and conceptually interwoven, forming revealing parallels and unexpected juxtapositions that complicate linear readings of art history.

Completing this dialogue across time and space is a permanent installation by Jenny Holzer, which engages enduring themes of civilization, historical memory and cross-cultural exchange through three texts carved into marble panels on the external walls of the museum’s galleries. Written in Sumerian-Akkadian, Arabic and French, these inscriptions present excerpts from a Mesopotamian Creation Myth tablet excavated from the ancient city of Assur in present-day Iraq, the 1588 annotated edition of Michel de Montaigne’s Essais and a passage from Ibn Khaldun’s 14th-century Muqaddimah, held in the Atif Efendi Library in Istanbul—a foundational text for modern disciplines such as economics, sociology, ethnography and the philosophy of history. Reflecting the museum’s multicultural origins and universalist approach to culture and creativity, Holzer’s intervention brings these texts—on the origins of thought, the act of writing and the transmission of knowledge—into a powerful spatial conversation with the building’s architecture. In doing so, she reactivates historical consciousness, inviting viewers to consider the universal rhythm of societal development shaped by the shared existential questions that have echoed across human civilizations for millennia.

Jenny Holzer, For Louvre Abu Dhabi (2017). Photo: Elisa Carollo for Observer

This museographic and historical approach—one that considers the global history of humanity as an interconnected whole—lays bare the extent to which traditional institutions remain shaped not only by Western-centric narratives but also by ethnographic frameworks that feel increasingly outdated in today’s multicultural and globally entangled society. What stands out at the Louvre Abu Dhabi is that it does not merely sidestep a Western or Eurocentric perspective; it adopts a global, multicultural and all-encompassing vision that actively fosters intercultural dialogue. It emphasizes the trans-geographical connections forged through centuries of trade, exchange, migration and mutual influence—tracing these entanglements back to the earliest moments of human civilization.

The Louvre Abu Dhabi’s museography is deliberately conceived as post-national, transhistorical and profoundly humanist, serving as a symbolic statement of the U.A.E.’s ambition to position itself as a bridge between civilizations and a catalyst for cross-cultural understanding. The museum points out that the “Abu Dhabi Collection has evolved over many years, contributing to the universal dialogue in the art world. It underscores the Emirate’s commitment to building a unique collection that disseminates cross-cultural and universal narratives. Spanning prehistory to the present, the collection reinforces Abu Dhabi’s status as a world-leading cultural centre dedicated to creating and sharing new research and knowledge.”

When museography aligns with a political agenda

It is particularly relevant to consider this museographic and curatorial approach in light of the geopolitical role the U.A.E. (as well as other Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia and, more recently, Qatar) seek to play within today’s shifting global dynamics. These nations have increasingly positioned themselves as neutral actors amid evolving international alliances, frequently serving as diplomatic hubs for high-stakes negotiations and conferences addressing urgent global challenges. At the same time, as relatively young states aiming to attract talent and capital, they have adopted comparatively open migration policies. The UAE, in particular, has become a refuge for individuals fleeing political unrest, war or authoritarian regimes in neighboring countries, as well as for nationals from countries like Russia, affected by international sanctions.

In parallel, both the UAE and Saudi Arabia have made significant investments in the cultural sector to shape domestic identity and diversify their oil-dependent economies and wield cultural production as a strategic instrument of diplomacy and soft power on the global stage.

In February, the United Arab Emirates and Italy significantly deepened their bilateral ties through a landmark agreement involving a $40 billion Emirati investment in Italy. The initiative spans more than forty agreements across sectors and establishes a comprehensive strategic partnership that prominently includes cultural collaboration—particularly in heritage preservation, tourism and artistic exchange.

A Medieval Madonna and Child sculpture next to Islamic architectural tiles in the Louvre Abu Dhabi. Photo: Elisa Carollo for Observer

In 2024, the UAE signed a similar memorandum of understanding with South Korea—a country widely recognized for its dynamic and effective cultural policies—once again emphasizing the strategic role of cultural diplomacy. Building on this framework, last September the Abu Dhabi Music & Arts Foundation (ADMAF) and the Korean Foundation for International Cultural Exchange (KOFICE) signed an additional MOU, reinforcing their shared commitment to sustained cultural collaboration.

One of the first outcomes of this partnership is “Layered Medium: We Are in Open Circuits,” a new exhibition that opened last week at Manarat Al Saadiyat in Abu Dhabi’s cultural district. Co-curated by Kyung-hwan Yeo and Maya El Khalil, the exhibition traces the evolution of Korea’s avant-garde art scene from the 1960s to the present through the work of 28 pioneering artists drawn from the Seoul Museum of Art’s collection. Crucially, and in contrast to many recent international showcases of Korean art, particularly in the U.S., this initiative moves beyond soft-power branding to establish a genuinely reciprocal platform for intercultural dialogue. Centered on the concept of “medium” and the entanglement of body, society and technology, the show opens a deeper conversation between the UAE and Korea, drawing meaningful parallels between their respective art scenes where artists have similarly responded to the pressures of accelerated urbanization and compressed modernity. A follow-up exhibition of U.A.E. artists from the 1990s to today will open at the Seoul Museum of Art, accompanied by a dual-publication featuring essays by writers and critics from both countries reflecting on one another’s artistic landscapes.

SEE ALSO: Tina Kim On Dansaekhwa, Diplomacy and Effective Canon Building

Similar MOUs centered on shared cultural priorities have been signed by the UAE with several other nations in recent years, including Greece (2020), the U.K. (2021) and Japan (2024). Meanwhile, signaling its broader cultural investment strategy, Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund ADQ acquired a minority stake in Sotheby’s, announcing a $1 billion investment last August.

At the same time, top international universities such as NYU and Berklee have expanded their presence in the U.A.E., strengthening institutional ties through the establishment of dedicated campuses. Also located in the Manarat Al Saadiyat district, Berklee College of Music opened in 2020 as a music and performing arts institution offering educational programs and live performances affiliated with the American university. NYU Abu Dhabi (NYUAD), launched in 2010 in partnership with the Abu Dhabi government via the Executive Affairs Authority, has since evolved into a fully accredited, degree-granting global campus of New York University—academically and administratively integrated with NYU New York and NYU Shanghai.

Gulf states advance with cultural power while the U.S. focuses elsewhere

As previously reported, neighboring Saudi Arabia has been particularly active in leveraging cultural diplomacy as a central instrument of soft power and international collaboration. The latest development came just weeks ago, when the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Asian Art (NMAA) signed an expanded partnership agreement with Saudi Arabia’s Royal Commission for AlUla—formalizing what had been a quietly growing collaboration focused on cultural heritage preservation and research. The agreement establishes joint initiatives in archaeological research, exhibition loans and curatorial exchange, with the dual aim of promoting AlUla as a global cultural destination and advancing scholarly understanding of the region’s heritage. As part of Saudi Arabia’s broader Vision 2030 strategy for economic diversification, the partnership adds to a growing roster of international collaborations—including recent agreements with the Centre Pompidou (supported by a €50 million donation toward the institution’s €262 million renovation), the Desert X biennial and UNESCO.



Source link

Why Republican hardliners aren’t backing Trump’s budget bill



Why Republican hardliners aren’t backing Trump’s budget bill – CBS News










































Watch CBS News



The House Rules Committee is holding a marathon hearing to try and pass President Trump’s massive budget plan to the floor for a vote. A small but influential group of hardline Republicans are refusing to fully back the bill.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Source link

Ramaphosa Says Private Meeting with Trump ‘Revolved Around Golf’

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa tried to put a brave face on his meetings with President Donald Trump on Wednesday, though he appeared to admit he made little headway, even in a private meeting.

Ramaphosa and his delegation attempted to counter Trump in a televised Oval Office meeting over his claims about South Africa’s treatment of white farmers, using three white participants as evidence that there was no “genocide.”

Trump then responded by playing a video showing incendiary, racist and violent rhetoric by South African political figures, such as Julius Malema. He also showed a memorial to victims of farm murders.

The South African team was taken by surprise and quickly found itself on the back foot. South African golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen corroborated some of Trump’s concerns about farm attacks and violent crime in general.

The day before, Ramaphosa had told reporters that he wanted to reach “a really good trade deal” with Trump. But the South African team had not offered any compromises, and evidently saw the primary purpose of their visit as correcting Trump’s “misinformation.”

At the end of the day, speaking to a press conference, Ramaphosa appeared to admit that his team had not been properly briefed. He blamed the fact that some members of his delegation had “just arrived today, or late last night.”

As for the private meeting that the delegation had with Trump after the Oval Office meeting, Ramaphosa said that it had been cordial. However, from his description, it seemed to have been quite superficial as well.

“Following that engagement which you all witnessed, we retired to what I think they call the Cabinet room, where we were able to have really good in-depth exchanges with President Trump and his other officials. The discussion revolved, of course, around golf, but they also revolved around issues of trade and investment,” he said.

Ramaphosa did claim one victory: he said that Trump had moved off his refusal to attend the G20 summit in Johannesburg, South Africa, in November. South Africa currently heads the G20 and passes the presidency to the United States later this year.

Trump implied that his attendance would depend on reform in South Africa, but did back away from an outright refusal to attend, which had been the administration’s previous stance.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of Trump 2.0: The Most Dramatic ‘First 100 Days’ in Presidential History, available for Amazon Kindle. He is also the author of The Trumpian Virtues: The Lessons and Legacy of Donald Trump’s Presidency, now available on Audible. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.



Source link

Trump, South African president clash over disputed White genocide claim



Trump, South African president clash over disputed White genocide claim – CBS News










































Watch CBS News



Differences between President Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa came to a head in a tense exchange in the Oval Office, as Mr. Trump confronted him over whether White genocide is taking place in South Africa. Mr. Trump has singled out White Afrikaner farmers for U.S. refugee status, claiming they’re persecuted in South Africa. But many people there say it’s simply not true. Weijia Jiang and Debora Patta have more.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Source link

Some Afrikaners say Trump is being lied to about a “White genocide” in South Africa: “It’s not happening”

Refugee admissions to the United States have all but ground to a halt — except for one group, or a “small subset,” as Secretary of State Marco Rubio called them on Tuesday: Afrikaners. They are members of the White ethnic minority that once led South Africa’s brutal, four-decade apartheid regime, which ended in 1994 with the election of Nelson Mandela as president. 

The Trump administration has already welcomed the first group of Afrikaner asylum applicants, who were given expedited refugee status after claiming they were the victims of violence and discrimination in South Africa.

Other Afrikaners are waiting, keen to take advantage of the offer of special treatment from the Trump administration to gain protected status and the right to live and work in the U.S.

Those hopefuls have been meeting to share information on the process, including Dolf Grobler, who has already applied. The professional hunter told CBS News he has $2.5 million to help make America great again.

“I’m worried that the genocide, which is currently mainly focused on White farmers, is going to spread,” he said. The claim of a White genocide is one that President Trump’s adviser Elon Musk, whose family are Afrikaners, has backed.

Musk joined Mr. Trump at the White House on Wednesday as the U.S. leader hosted South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa for an official visit. The Afrikaner refugee program was a topic of discussion, along with trade and other matters. In the Oval Office meeting, Ramaphosa pushed back against Mr. Trump’s repeated claims of Whites being targeted.

“Those people in many cases, are being executed, being executed, and they happen to be White, and most happen to be farmers,” Mr. Trump said, calling the situation “sort of the opposite of apartheid.”

“People who do get killed, unfortunately, through criminal activity, are not only White people. Majority of them are Black people,” Ramaphosa said.

According to South African police, in the last three months of 2024, 12 people were murdered on farms there; one was a White farmer, while the others were Black laborers or security workers. Asked if he believed life for him and his family was better under apartheid — an overtly racist minority-rule system that denied equal rights to South Africa’s vast majority Black population — Grobler didn’t hesitate.

“Yes,” he told CBS News. “I can’t say in my heart that we are better off now.” Although he did concede apartheid was wrong.

Claims of a White genocide are often circulated by right-wing groups, but the view is not held widely within the Afrikaner community.

Afrikaner commentator Piet Croucamp, an academic at North-West University in South Africa, says the claims are simply untrue.

“There’s no sign of it, never has been. In fact, Whites are economically the strongest group” in South Africa, Croucamp told CBS News. “64% of all boardrooms in South Africa are still White. The average incomes of White South Africans are vastly higher than Black South Africans … they have better schools, they have better education, private health care. This is the land of milk and honey if you’re White.”

Croucamp suspects the South African government’s strong stance against Israel’s actions in Gaza, and its relations with China, could have played some part in Mr. Trump’s decision to embrace the controversial amnesty program for Afrikaners, but he believes there’s more to it.

“In South Africa, right-wing groups, so-called civil society groups, we know that they have access to the Trump administration because they claim that. And just over the last few days, they have, several times, they said that they will speak to the American government, as if they have access to them. And if you listen to what Trump has said, it corresponds exactly with the genocide narrative that they sell and that they market,” Croucamp said. “So, I’m afraid I have to believe them when they say they have direct access to the Trump administration, and we see what Trump has been doing.”

Grilled about the refugee program Tuesday on Capitol Hill, in a testy exchange with Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, Secretary of State Rubio insisted that U.S. foreign policy “doesn’t require even-handedness, it involves prioritizing the interests of the United States. … The United States has a right to pick and choose who they allow into the United States.”

White South Africans make up only about 7% of the country’s population, but they still own more than half of all its farmland. And while the country has a staggeringly high crime rate, racial motives are not generally a factor, according to Afrikaner cattle farmer Nick Serfontein.

He acknowledged that violent attacks on farmers do occur, especially in agricultural land near big cities, where there are often large, impoverished populations, but he said overall, “I feel safe. I sleep with my doors open here on the farm.”

There have also been allegations that White farmers are the victims of land expropriation, with the government seizing farms without providing compensation. In January, Ramaphosa signed into law measures to expropriate mostly unused land for public use, which his government said was necessary to address the consequences of decades of apartheid. While the law provides for fair compensation in most cases, it also allows for expropriation without compensation under limited circumstances. And any measures can be challenged in court.

Mr. Trump has argued that it unfairly targets White landowners, though the law does not mention the race of anyone who could be affected under the legislation.

And more importantly, there hasn’t been a single case of expropriation without compensation documented in the 31 years since apartheid ended.

Serfontein argues the problem isn’t a deliberate effort by the government to seize White-owned land without compensation, but rather “because of a dysfunctional government. The model is wrong.”

He said that for decades, land has been handed over to a Black population with compensation for former owners under established rules, but without any support for the new owners. So, almost a decade ago, Serfontein helped to launch a project aimed at training new Black farmers to work the land.

To date, he says he’s personally helped train more than 700 young Black farmers — the country’s next generation of agricultural workers.

“I’m extremely positive, and so are the young people, the young farmers, they are positive,” he said.

As for a white genocide, he agreed with Croucamp, saying bluntly: “It’s not happening.”

Serfontein said he didn’t know the histories of the Afrikaners who had already left for the U.S., and he didn’t doubt they “probably had some unhappy experiences in South Africa, about a number of things. But let me tell you that if you went to NAMPO last week — NAMPO is the biggest agricultural show in the Southern Hemisphere — you would have found a vibe there between the farmers, young farmers, old farmers, Black farmers, White farmers, that you’ve never experienced before. They are so excited about the future of South Africa.”

They want to farm in a country, Serfontein says, where most people understand that the land must be shared by both Black and White.

Source link

Judge scraps federal rules requiring employers to give workers time off for abortions

A federal judge on Wednesday struck down regulations requiring most U.S. employers to provide workers with time off and other accommodations for abortions.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge David Joseph of the Western District of Louisiana was a victory for conservative lawmakers and religious groups who decried the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s decision to include abortion among pregnancy-related conditions in regulations on how to implement the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, which passed in December 2022.

The EEOC’s decision swiftly prompted several lawsuits and eroded what had been strong bipartisan support for the law designed to strengthen the rights of pregnant workers.

Joseph, who was appointed by President Trump during his first term, ruled that the EEOC exceeded its authority by including abortion in its regulations. His ruling came in two consolidated lawsuits brought by the attorneys general of Louisiana and Mississippi, and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic University and two Catholic dioceses.

Joseph sided with the plaintiffs’ argument that if Congress had intended for abortion to be covered by the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, “It would have spoken clearly when enacting the statute, particularly given the enormous social, religious, and political importance of the abortion issue in our nation at this time.”

Mississippi and Louisiana have near-total bans on abortion, except to save the life of the pregnant person or in cases of a rape that has been reported to law enforcement in Mississippi, and when there is a substantial risk of death or impairment to the patient in continuing the pregnancy and in cases where the fetus has a fatal abnormality in Louisiana.

Bipartisan support for pregnant workers law

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act passed with widespread bipartisan support after a decade-long campaign by women’s right advocates, who hailed it as a win for low-wage pregnant workers who have routinely been denied accommodations for everything from time off for medical appointments to the ability to sit or stand on the job.

The federal law applies to employers with 15 or more employees.

While the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 prohibits employers from firing pregnant workers, the law did little to guarantee that women would receive accommodations they might need at work. As a result, many women were forced to keep working under unsafe conditions, or were forced to take unpaid leave by employers who refused to accommodate their needs.

But many Republican lawmakers, including Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy, who co-sponsored the bill, were furious when the EEOC stated that the law covered abortions. The EEOC’s commissioners approved the rules in a 3-2 vote along party lines, with both Republican commissioners voting against it.

Joseph vacated the provision of the EEOC regulations that included abortion as a “related medical condition” of pregnancy and childbirth. However, the rest of the regulations still stand.

“Victory! A federal court has granted Louisiana’s request to strike down an EEOC rule requiring employers to accommodate employees’ purely elective abortions. This is a win for Louisiana and for life!” Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said in a statement e-mailed to The Associated Press.

A Better Balance, the advocacy group that spearheaded a decade-long campaign for passage of the law, condemned the ruling.

“This court’s decision to deny workers reasonable accommodations for abortion-related needs is part of a broader attack on women’s rights and reproductive freedom,” A Better Balance President Inimai Chettiar said in a statement.

EEOC adrift

Wednesday’s ruling comes as the Trump administration has moved to impose tumultuous changes at the EEOC that will almost certainly lead the agency to eventually rewrite the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act regulations.

President Trump fired two of the EEOC’s democratic commissioners before their terms ended, paving the way for him to establish a Republican majority and make major policy changes on how to interpret and enforce the nation’s workplace civil rights laws.

For now, Mr. Trump’s move left EEOC without the quorum needed to make key decisions, including rescinding or revising regulations. The president tapped an assistant U.S. attorney in Florida, Brittany Panuccio, to fill one of the vacancies. If she confirmed by the Senate, the EEOC will regain its quorum.

Acting EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas, who voted against the regulations because of the abortion provision, has said she will work to change them.

Similar lawsuits challenging the abortion provision are underway, including one filed by 17 states, led by Tennessee and Arkansas. In February, an appeals court ruled that lawsuit could proceed, overturning a lower court’s decision to dismiss the complaint.

Under former President Joe Biden, the Justice Department had defended the EEOC against those lawsuits but it is unclear whether it will continue to do so under the Trump administration. The Justice Department did not reply to request for comment on Wednesday’s ruling.

Chettiar said the Trump administration is unlikely to appeal the ruling, adding to its significance.

“The impact of this is huge,” Chettiar said in an interview with The Associated Press, calling the decision “symbolic and a big signal of where the right is when it comes to the rights of women.”

However, the Trump administration has continued defend the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act itself in a lawsuit brought by the state of Texas that seeks to overturn the law in its entirety.

Source link

What is the “Golden Dome for America”? Here’s what to know about Trump’s missile defense plan.

President Trump’s missile defense project, called the “Golden Dome for America,” aims to protect the U.S. from foreign threats. But it has been criticized by China as threatening to increase the risks of militarizing space and a global arms race.

The president on Tuesday said his administration had “selected an architecture” for the “state-of-the-art system,” which could cost hundreds of billions of dollars and put U.S. weapons in space for the first time in history.

What is the Golden Dome and how will it work?

The Golden Dome is a multilayered defense system that the president, speaking in the Oval Office alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, said will deploy “next-generation technologies across the land, sea and space, including space-based sensors and interceptors.”

“The Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world and even if they are launched from space,” the president said, adding that he wants it to be operational before his term ends.

The concept includes both ground- and space-based capabilities that would defend against missiles by: detecting and destroying them ahead of launch, intercepting them early in flight, halting them midcourse and stopping them in the last few moments of approaching a target. 

The initiative would have multiple layers that expand on what the U.S. already has and build new programs to counter the full range of aerial threats, according to Gen. Gregory Guillot, the head of U.S. Northern Command, who testified in front of Congress in April. 

He described a domain awareness layer to track threats and then two other layers, “the first being an ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) defeat layer, which largely exists today with the GBIs (ground-based interceptors) that can defeat a North Korean threat and then an air layer that would defeat cruise missiles and air threats.”

“This is not going to be off the cuff,” Tom Karako, the director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told CBS News in an interview. 

“This is going to be well-rooted in the systems engineering and the understanding of the threat and in the overall architecture plans that have been in the works for a long time,” Karako said. 

The new initiative, which will encompass many programs, will be built in states including Florida, Georgia, Indiana and Alaska, according to Mr. Trump, and involve multiple American defense and technology companies that have not yet been selected. 

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated a cost of $542 billion for the space-based components alone. 

Aerospace and defense company Lockheed Martin, which said on X it is ready to support the dome mission, describes it as a “revolutionary concept.”

“This is a Manhattan Project-scale mission, one that is both urgent and crucial to America’s security,” the company says.

Lockheed Martin COO Frank St. John said it would protect against nuclear missiles, as well as intermediate-range ballistic and cruise missiles, and other threats. 

Mr. Trump said U.S. Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein would be responsible for overseeing the dome’s progress.

However, there is no funding yet to match the plan, which is “still in the conceptual stage,” Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told senators on Tuesday at a hearing. The Pentagon is also still developing the requirements that the dome will have to meet, The Associated Press reported.

Israel’s Iron Dome

The Golden Dome idea first came to public light during Mr. Trump’s joint address to Congress in March, when he asked for funding for it. He said, “Israel has it, other places have it, and the United States should have it, too.”

The president was referring to Israel’s Iron Dome, which at least partially inspired the Golden Dome concept. Israel’s system, installed in 2011 to defend against incoming projectiles, largely addresses shorter-range threats like rockets, while two other air defense systems work to defend against missiles.

The Iron Dome, developed with U.S. backing, has intercepted thousands of rockets and has a success rate topping 90%, according to Israel.

China responds

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said her country urges the U.S. “to abandon the development and deployment of a global missile defense system as soon as possible.”

“The United States, in pursuing a ‘U.S.-first’ policy, is obsessed with seeking absolute security for itself,” she said at a Wednesday briefing in Beijing, according to news agencies. “This violates the principle that the security of all countries should not be compromised and undermines global strategic balance and stability. China is seriously concerned about this.”

She also said the Golden Dome plan “heightens the risk of space becoming a battlefield” and “fuels an arms race.”

When asked about China’s response in an interview on “Fox & Friends First,” Lockheed Martin’s St. John said, “What we’ve seen historically is that the thing that leads to conflict is the lack of deterrence, and so our belief, along with the administration, is that having strong deterrence is the best way to deter conflict.”

A U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency assessment shows that the U.S. military expects, over the coming decade, to contend with missile threats that are greater in “scale and sophistication.” It also said that “China and Russia are developing an array of novel delivery systems to exploit gaps in the current U.S. ballistic missile defenses.”

China has been rapidly developing missile and other military capabilities, while deepening ties with Russia. The two nations said in a statement earlier this month that the dome project was “deeply destabilizing in nature” and would turn space into “an arena for armed confrontation.”

Karako said that the Golden Dome initiative is “a belated realignment of U.S. missile defense policy” to counter both China and Russia, countries that the last two administrations in their national defense strategies have pointed to as strategic competitors. 

Source link

South Africa’s Julius Malema Responds to Trump’s Claim of ‘Genocide’ by Doubling Down: ‘Kill the Farmer!’

South African politician Julius Malema, the leader of the radical Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party, responded to President Donald Trump’s claims about “genocide” Wednesday by reiterating calls to kill white farmers.

Earlier that day, Trump had shown visiting South African President Cyril Ramaphosa video of Malema leading rally chants of “Kill the Boer!”, “Kill the farmer!”, “Shoot to kill!”, and other incendiary slogans.

Ramaphosa tried to argue that Malema’s rhetoric did not represent the government’s policies, but Trump countered that South Africa had passed a law allowing expropriation of land without compensation, that it had racially discriminatory laws, and that thousands of white farmers were attempting to leave to the U.S.

Malema reacted angrily on X, reiterating his commitment to expropriation without compensation.

His party later issued a statement in which it declared: “Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer! Victory is Certain!”

Ramaphosa and his delegation tried to minimize the role of Malema and the EFF in South African politics, describing them to Trump as a small and marginal opposition party, but the EFF won nearly 10% of the vote in the most recent general elections, making it the fourth-biggest party, right behind the similarly radical Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) party at nearly 15%. Both parties call for seizing land from white farmers.

As Breitbart News has reported, South Africa has refused to enforce hate speech laws against Malema.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of Trump 2.0: The Most Dramatic ‘First 100 Days’ in Presidential History, available for Amazon Kindle. He is also the author of The Trumpian Virtues: The Lessons and Legacy of Donald Trump’s Presidency, now available on Audible. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.



Source link