Tracey Emin’s paintings have an uncanny ability to get inside you and stir up all kinds of conflicting emotions, and her recent exhibition, “I Loved You Until The Morning,” at the Yale Center for British Art was an emotional broil. I alternated between rage and sadness, revulsion and awe. I asked the museum guard what he thought. He said, “It’s more painful than there is love. But it is because of love that there is pain.” A young woman stood with her face a foot away from the figure’s open legs with their gush of crimson for a good five minutes, unmoving. An older woman told me that it made her relive her forty years of menstruation: the cramps and emotional swings and her two abortions.
Not for the faint of heart, Emin’s work demands attention. The paintings here are large—one is six feet by seven feet, another nearly seven by nine—mostly done in red, black, blue and white acrylic paint. The naked female figures are splayed across the canvas, exposed and vulnerable. And So It Felt Like This (2018) is a spare line of a seated nude woman, slumped back, legs wide, red paint pouring out from between her legs. The face is not defined, nor are her hands. For all its painted simplicity, it packs a visceral punch. Has she just been raped and left nearly dead? Is she in the throes of a painful period? Has she just given birth? Lost the baby? All of these possibilities explode out of the painting, relentless and hurting. Art critic Jerry Saltz once called Emin, “one of the greatest artists alive in the world today.”
Born in 1963 in the seaside town of Margate, England, Emin grew up in poverty and was three times homeless. As a child, she was sexually abused and at 13 raped. At 27, she had a painful, botched abortion with a doctor who dismissed her distress. In her 22-minute film How It Feels (1996), she talks about the abortion and how making art could no longer “be about a fuckin’ picture. It couldn’t be about something visual…an old-fashioned idea that made no sense for the times we are living in…It had to be about where it was really coming from.”
The installation work My Bed (1998) was her own slept-in bed, with dirty sheets and underwear, empty alcohol bottles, pills, cigarette butts and used condoms. It was shortlisted for the Turner Prize and installed at the Tate Museum, London, drawing huge crowds. My Bed pitched her onto the art world map. She exhibited at the Venice Biennale in 2006, the second woman in the history of the British Pavilion to be offered a solo show.
Emin has had three exhibitions with her favorite artists: Egon Schiele, Edvard Munch and J. M. W. Turner. Her nine-foot-high, eighteen-ton bronze sculpture The Mother towers at the Munch Museum in Oslo. The monumental piece was created as a tribute to her mother, to all mothers and to the Earth.
She was elected to the Royal Academy in 2007 and became its Eranda Professor of Drawing in 2011. In 2020, Emin bought a 1909 bathhouse in Margate, Kent, the seaside town where she was born and grew up. She renovated it and founded the Tracey Emin Artist Residency (TEAR), a studio-based, two-year art school where all the classes and lectures are free. TKE Studios offers affordable studio space for twelve professional artists with a strong practice. “If my art can do something for the future, then I’ve done something for the world.” In 2024, she was appointed Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire for her contributions to the visual arts.
“I Loved You Until The Morning” features nineteen of her large-scale acrylic on canvas works, along with three bronze sculptures, thirteen drawings and a six-by-six-foot yellow neon sign greeting you at the entrance with the title of the show. One could visit the exhibition and study only the titles of the work, which read like Emin’s memoir (and like those of any number of women’s lives, poignant and spot-on). I said No, And It was Love, I Followed you to the end, I wanted to be clean, Pelvis High, Sometimes There is No Reason, You kept it coming, I never Asked to Fall in Love – You made me Feel like This. The exhibit is stunningly curated by Martina Droth, and the thorough and beautifully illustrated catalogue includes her excellent essay.
The paintings are layered with thin paint, not, as Emin said, “great big thick macho globules of paint.” She lets the blood red drip, the inky black obscure, the whites blend, thin sketchy blue lines illustrate. Describing the paintings feels like a disservice to the art. They are swimming in fury and compassion. They are violent, aggressive, in-your-face confrontational, and filled with pain, sorrow and loss. I asked one man viewing the exhibition what he thought about Emin’s paintings, and he said, “All the mistakes I made with women are here.”
Mark Bradford, Darren Walker, Thelma Golden and Komal Shah. Getty Images for MoMA
With Glenn D. Lowry, the longest-serving director of the Museum of Modern Art, retiring this fall after 30 years, what better way to honor him than at one of the art world’s swankiest springtime parties? A definite highlight of the increasingly packed soirée season, MoMA’s Party in the Garden (and its storied afterparty) always attracts an eclectic crowd of not only philanthropists, financiers and patrons of the arts but also artists, collectors, celebrities, art world wonks and sundry socialites. This year’s vibe was clearly laid out in the dress code—“Festive”—which manifested in an array of bright summer shades and modern prints and patterns on the guests and in the decor.
To start, revelers gathered in the museum’s celebrated Abby Aldrich Rockefeller Sculpture Garden for cocktails before making their way to a sit-down dinner in the lobby, where Sarah Arison, Marie-Josée Kravis and, of course, Mr. Lowry shared wise words. Spotted at the sold-out affair were some of New York’s shiniest stars in the arts. Tory Burch, who sponsored the 2025 Party in the Garden, dressed best-selling author Sarah Hoover and multihyphenate Colby Mugrabi. Unsurprisingly, the list of artists in attendance was long and included a heady mix of established names and rising stars, from Doug AItken, Glenn Ligon, Mark Bradford and Brian Donnelly (better known as KAWS) to Rashid Johnson, Cindy Sherman, Firelei Báez and Marina Abramović, among many others.
As the evening wore on, philanthropic powerhouses like Michael Bloomberg, David Booth, Agnes Gund and David and Susan Rockefeller mingled with FLAG Art Foundation’s Glenn and Amanda Fuhrman, The Studio Museum in Harlem director Thelma Golden, Pace founder Arne Glimcher, arts equity champion Darren Walker and the inimitable Larry Gagosian. Also spotted were actors Stephanie March, Sam Waterston and Delaney Rowe and models Alex Consani and Gabrielle Richardson.
Role Model at the Party in the Garden afterparty. Jason Lowrie/BFA.com
After dinner, a new round of revelers made their way to the sculpture garden for the aforementioned afterparty, where singer-songwriter Role Model took the stage before DJs Rae Sada and Gale Scott started spinning sets.
Thelma Golden and Glenn D. Lowry
Thelma Golden and Glenn D. Lowry. Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images
Diana Taylor and Michael Bloomberg
Diana Taylor and Michael Bloomberg. Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for MoMA
Paola Mura, artistic director of Magazzino Italian Art. Marco Anelli
The New York museum Magazzino Italian Art has just opened a show of work by artist Maria Lai (1919-2013), “A Journey to America,” which represents the recently rediscovered artist’s first retrospective in the United States. Early impressions have been strong, with The Brooklyn Rail running two reviews (a rarity)—the first concluding that “her art is more topical than ever” while the other said the exhibition was “comprehensive and speaks to an idiosyncratic artist and ritualist who, in remaining tethered to the line, both culled and advanced Sardinia’s folkloric social history.” This is one not to miss if you find yourself spending some time upstate this summer. We caught up with Paola Mura, Magazzino’s artistic director and the show’s curator, to hear more about it.
Can you explain the significance of Maria Lai’s work for our readers who may not be aware of it?
Maria Lai is one of the most singular and resonant voices in Italian art of the 20th Century. Deeply rooted in the traditions and landscapes of her native Sardinia, she developed a profoundly original artistic language that combines storytelling, symbolism and a deep connection to memory, identity and place.
Working with humble materials—threads, fabric, paper, stones—Lai created works that transcend boundaries between drawing, sculpture and poetry. Her art speaks of relationships: between individuals, between communities and between humanity and the cosmos. In 1981, she realized Legarsi alla montagna (Tying Yourself to the Mountain), widely considered the first example of relational art in Italy, involving the entire population of her hometown in a poetic act of connection and reconciliation.
Lai’s work, though profoundly local in its references, touches on universal themes: belonging, transformation and the invisible threads that bind us all. Her poetic vision and quiet radicalism have only recently begun to receive the international recognition they deserve. This retrospective not only marks her American debut on this scale but also highlights her enduring relevance in today’s conversations around art, community and care. I think her voice is both timeless and incredibly relevant right now.
This is probably a big question, but could you talk about the symbolic significance of sewing in her work?
Sewing holds a central place in Maria Lai’s artistic language, not only as a method but as a gesture laden with meaning. For Lai, stitching was a way of writing without words, a tactile and intimate form of inscription. The thread became a line, a form of drawing, but also a way of narrating—of binding together memory, silence and emotion.
Her Libri cuciti (Sewn Books) are emblematic of this approach: pages of fabric are pierced and joined by delicate threads that trace marks resembling script, yet without any decipherable text. This asemic writing invites the viewer to read not through language but through intuition, sensation and rhythm. It’s a book that speaks through absence—through what is felt rather than said—drawing us into a space of contemplation.
Sewing, in Lai’s hands, becomes both a solitary and a connective act. It is about repair, relation and transmission. She elevates what is traditionally seen as a domestic or ‘feminine’ gesture into a tool of philosophical inquiry, collapsing the boundaries between craft and art, between the intimate and the conceptual.
Ultimately, sewing for Lai is a metaphor for human connection—for how we are bound to one another, how we carry memory and how meaning is always provisional, always in the process of being stitched together.
This show features around 100 works made from the 1950s to the 2000s. That must have been difficult to coordinate! From where did these works travel to New York? Private collections? Museums?
Yes, it was a complex and incredibly rewarding process. The exhibition brings together works from a wide range of sources, reflecting both the breadth of Maria Lai’s career and the richness of her legacy. A significant portion of the show is drawn from the collection of Magazzino Italian Art itself—a testament to the longstanding vision of Nancy Olnick and Giorgio Spanu, who began collecting Lai’s work over thirty years ago.
We’ve also included a rare group of works that Lai brought with her during her 1968 trip to Canada and New York. Many of these are now part of private American collections and are being shown publicly for the first time in decades—if ever.
Beyond that, the exhibition is enriched by extraordinary loans from major institutions in Sardinia and across Italy, including the MAN in Nuoro, the Museo di Aggius, the Musei Civici di Cagliari, the MUSMA in Matera, the Fondazione Maria Lai, the Fondazione di Sardegna and, last but not least, the Consiglio Regionale della Sardegna. It’s been a collaborative effort across continents, made possible by the generosity and enthusiasm of institutions and collectors who deeply believe in the importance of sharing Lai’s work with a wider audience.
What are some of the standout pieces that visitors should be sure not to miss?
It’s difficult to choose from such a rich and multifaceted body of work, but several pieces across the galleries offer key insights into Lai’s evolving practice. From the earliest section, Gregge di pecore (1959) is particularly significant: here, the flock dissolves into the stony terrain, an early example of Lai’s lyrical synthesis of figure and landscape and of her lifelong dialogue with Sardinia. Terre bianche (1968), made for her pivotal journey to America, exemplifies her transition into abstraction, merging texture, gesture and cosmic reference.
Tela cucita (1975) is a landmark work in which Lai “paints” with sewn bands of fabric, reimagining the loom as both symbol and structure. From the Telai series, Telaio in sole e mare (1971), reminiscent of Mondrian and Rauschenberg, reflects her engagement with spatial language, and La torre (1971-2002) in particular, created in response to the events of Sept. 11, is a profound meditation on fragility and resilience, with broader historical and emotional resonances.
Later works such as Fili di vela spaziale (2007) distill her interest in the cosmos into pure thread and velvet, while Lettere (2008), composed of sewn pages in the form of signed letters linked by thread, functions as a kind of self-portrait and a final message—an intimate culmination of Lai’s lifelong exploration of memory, language and interconnection.
Finally, Tenendo per mano l’ombra (1987) stands out as a deeply poetic sewn fairy tale: a meditation on the human capacity to embrace the shadow self and an invitation to move through the world with empathy and introspection.
Of course, this selection reflects only a small portion of what is on view—and, inevitably, it is shaped by personal affinity. But it’s a pleasure to highlight these particular works, especially given the extraordinary opportunity to bring so many of them together here in New York.
Lai is credited with bringing relational aesthetics to Italy. Why was that important?
Maria Lai’s Legarsi alla montagna (1981) is now widely recognized as the first work of relational aesthetics in Italy—remarkable not only for its timing but for how deeply it redefined the relationship between artist, audience and place. Rather than producing an autonomous object, Lai orchestrated a collective action that involved the entire village of Ulassai in tying their homes—and themselves—to the mountain with blue ribbon. The result was not merely symbolic; it was a lived gesture of community and collective ritual of reconnection through art.
This was profoundly important in the Italian context, especially during a period when much contemporary art remained centered on the object or on institutional critique. Lai proposed a different model: one rooted in empathy, shared authorship and the poetry of everyday life. She anticipated by decades what would become central tenets of socially engaged practice.
Her contribution was not just theoretical. Legarsi alla montagna continues to shape how artists, curators and institutions think about art’s role in civic life. It was a turning point that showed how deeply aesthetic experience could be embedded in local memory, social space and communal imagination.
Lai was not a part of the Arte Povera movement but is associated with it. There seems to be a vogue for that art, with the recent show at the Bourse de Commerce and talk of a Nobel Peace Prize for Michelangelo Pistoletto. Why do you think this kind of art resonates with people at this moment?
While Maria Lai was never formally part of Arte Povera, her affinities with the movement—through her use of humble materials and her anti-monumental sensibility—are unmistakable. What sets her apart, and perhaps makes her work so resonant today, is the deeply intimate and narrative quality she brought to those materials.
There’s a renewed attention to Arte Povera now, I think, because it offers a language of resistance against excess, spectacle and disposability. In an age of ecological crisis and social fragmentation, the idea that art can be made from what is already at hand—fabric scraps, stones, thread—feels not only sustainable but ethically grounded. These works speak to fragility and resilience in equal measure.
In Lai’s case, this resonates even more powerfully because her “poor materials” are never impersonal. They are sewn, tied, handled—infused with memory, myth and care. Her works, like those of Kounellis, remind us that art can be radically simple and profoundly human. They help us imagine forms of connection and creativity that are both ancient and urgently needed now. And her art offers a quiet but powerful reminder that transformation doesn’t always require grand gestures. Sometimes it begins with a single stitch.
Can you speak to the way she integrated Italian craft traditions with the trends being pioneered by her contemporaries like Robert Rauschenberg and Cy Twombly?
Maria Lai’s practice is remarkable for the way it bridges two worlds: the deep-rooted traditions of Sardinian and Italian craft and the avant-garde currents shaping postwar art internationally.
While artists like Rauschenberg and Twombly were expanding the vocabulary of painting through assemblage, mark-making and text, Lai was arriving at similar formal experiments through a very different entry point—one that was not only academic but more personal, tactile and grounded in millenary traditions.
She was an excellent painter and sculptor, but from the 1960s on, instead of using paint or pencil, Lai “drew” with thread, sewed instead of writing and turned fabric into narrative space. Her sewn books and looms are in dialogue with the gestural abstraction of Twombly or the material poetics of Rauschenberg’s combines, but their language is unmistakably her own, inflected by the rhythms of weaving, the oral storytelling of Sardinian women and the ritual of making by hand.
What’s radical about Lai is how she internalized the conceptual innovations of her time but expressed them through textile, myth and silence rather than spectacle or theory. Her work challenges hierarchies—between art and craft, word and image, masculine and feminine—and insists on a kind of slowness and embodied knowledge that feels increasingly urgent today. She didn’t just adopt the visual idioms of the avant-garde; she translated them into a new language.
Over the past decade and change, the Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago has set itself apart with bold, ambitious programming that spotlights the regional art scene and landmark surveys of leading contemporary artists from the U.S. and abroad. At the helm of the 58-year-old institution’s recent evolution is director Madeleine Grynsztejn, who has led MCA Chicago for 17 years with a focus on curatorial quality, community engagement and ethical governance. Under her leadership, the museum has expanded and diversified its collection through significant gifts and acquisitions, while launching forward-thinking initiatives that redefined its role in the city’s cultural landscape.
Ahead of the museum’s much-anticipated quinquennial MCA Art Auction with Sotheby’s, Observer spoke with Grynsztejn about how she has transformed MCA Chicago into a community-first institution that plays a pivotal role in shaping and fostering Chicago’s increasingly dynamic art scene.
For the director, every aspect of the MCA’s mission begins with a steadfast belief in art’s ability to shape a more imaginative and courageous future. “I’ve always believed that museums can be more than places where art is shown. We strive to be active contributors to public life,” she tells Observer. “Every visitor to the MCA, whether in person or online, enters into a kind of contract with us: bring us your curiosity and we will show you how art can expand your thinking and deepen your understanding of self and society.”
MCA Chicago director Madeleine Grynsztejn. MCA Chicago
Grynsztejn has grounded her approach to helming the institution in three guiding principles: championing revelatory art, fostering social belonging and ensuring that internal practices mirror the ethics of the museum. “Whether we’re commissioning new work, building our team or orchestrating a public program, we’re committed to choices that feel purposeful and in step with the communities we serve,” she says, describing a vision anchored in equal parts artist activation and audience engagement. “That means we don’t just present art but also catalyze its creation in deep collaboration with the artist. We ensure the museum is responsive to our public.” For Grynsztejn, the MCA is a collaboration between artist and audience. “The artwork cannot exist without the artist who makes the work and the spectator who ‘completes the picture’ with their engagement.”
Most recently, the MCA has actively sought to reassess and reframe its collection. For Grynsztejn, the collection isn’t a static treasure box of masterpieces but rather a toolbox. “The collection is the DNA of the museum, its very soul. Embedded in the MCA’s collection is the unfolding history of the most advanced contemporary art practices since 1967,” she asserts, adding that the trove must remain a living resource that communities can draw on to imagine new ways forward.
Exhibitions like “Descending the Staircase,” which showcases novel artistic approaches to representing the human body, invite audiences to explore fresh interpretations and narratives that earlier presentations of works from the collection overlooked. “City in a Garden: Queer Art Activism in Chicago,” opening July 5, extends that approach—reminding visitors that a collection never remains fixed; it evolves with the times, shaped by the questions we ask and the voices we choose to amplify.
The collection and its evolution as a community fixture are intertwined with the history of the MCA Art Auction: generous donors acquired several major works during past editions and contributed them to the museum’s holdings. Grynsztejn says the Art Auction is no ordinary fundraiser, and the museum holds it just once every five years by design. “This allows the museum to plan thoughtfully, collaborate closely with artists and galleries, and ensure the event reflects the museum’s values as well as its goals,” she explains.
The 2025 edition of the auction honors Ed Ruscha, an artist whose relationship with the museum spans more than three decades. “We’re thrilled to include a new commission from him in this auction,” Grynsztejn says. “It’s one more chapter in a long and evolving story.” His Yup Nope, a new work from 2025, has an estimate of $850,000.
The auction will feature 100 works by some of the most prominent contemporary artists of our time, including some with longstanding ties to the museum like Rashid Johnson, Sanford Biggers, Paul Pfeiffer, Doris Salcedo, Amanda Williams and Judy Chicago. The museum will also present new commissions in private sale alongside Ruscha’s, including Sarah Sze’s Missed, 2024 (estimate: $450,000) and Luc Tuymans’s Reflection, 2024 (estimate: $400,000), a timely new painting inspired by both a personal experience with immigration officials and an interrogation reenacted for a documentary film. Sze and Tuymans exhibited at the MCA in 1999 and 2010, respectively.
Many of the artists whose work is featured in the auction have contributed to multiple editions of the sale, which Grynsztejn says is a testament to the long-term relationships and trust the MCA has cultivated. “That continuity defines our approach. We often call it our ‘boomerang’ model; artists come back because the relationships are real.”
Bidding for the online auction opened May 19 and continues through June 6, when the MCA will host an associated in-person event. Acquisitions do more than support the museum’s immediate mission, according to Grynsztejn—the eventual gift of art to the collection strengthens the institution in a lasting way. “Proceeds from the auction will support our most ambitious priorities: bold exhibitions, a canon-expanding acquisitions strategy, and public programs that animate connection and belonging. It’s not just about the works on the walls but about everything that surrounds them: the connection to beauty, meaning and community.”
The museum’s programming reflects the city it serves
Grynsztejn believes the city’s institutions must be attuned to the diverse communities and cultures that define contemporary Chicago. That means creating exhibitions, programs and content that are responsive, accessible and inclusive—both in terms of content and the language used. She pointed to the fact that nearly one in three Chicagoans identifies as Latino or Hispanic, and nearly one in five speaks Spanish at home. In response, the MCA launched a museum-wide initiative to expand bilingual offerings—from signage and printed materials to public and digital programs—ensuring that language never becomes a barrier to participation.
But inclusivity also hinges on the stories institutions choose to tell and whose voices they bring to the forefront. “We’ve long supported exhibitions that center women, BIPOC and LGBTQ+ artists and explore how migration and identity inform creative expression,” Grynsztejn says. “That work felt especially urgent in the lead-up to the 2024 election. It’s also reflected in how we collect, intentionally building a permanent collection that better represents the communities we serve.” Today, works by Black women artists comprise ten times the national average in the MCA’s holdings—the result of sustained, values-driven effort.
The Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago has likewise forged partnerships across the city with organizations like the Sueños Music Festival, the Mexican Consulate and the Lit & Luz Festival to meet audiences where they are. “Our goal is to make the MCA feel grounded in the life of the city. It needs to be a space that people see themselves in, and one they help influence and contribute to in return.”
With shifts in federal leadership, many U.S. cultural institutions now face funding cuts—particularly those that openly prioritize diversity and inclusion. When asked what the MCA has experienced in this climate and how the museum is navigating the challenges, Grynsztejn is quick to clarify that the museum remains focused on staying true to its values and mission, regardless of political or economic headwinds. “Moments like this are a reminder of what museums can be: cultural and civic spaces where people come together across differing perspectives,” she says. “Acting as a bridge across differences, sparking conversation, and fostering empathy feels more urgent than ever.”
Luc Tuymans, Reflection, 2024; Estimate: $400,000. Courtesy Studio Luc Tuymans, Antwerp, and David Zwirner
Grynsztejn sees this year’s Art Auction as particularly meaningful because funds raised are proof of a shared commitment to the museum’s mission and sustaining its momentum. “The people who stand with the MCA believe in what the museum does for artists and audiences,” she says. “The strongest partnerships grow from that alignment, and we’re fortunate to have many that have lasted for years because of it.”
How the MCA supports Chicago’s art ecosystem
With Grynsztejn’s community-centered and collaborative approach, MCA Chicago has become a cornerstone of the city’s rapidly growing and increasingly dynamic art ecosystem. “Chicago’s art scene is one of the most compelling and creative in the country,” she says, noting that the city draws talent early, thanks to institutions like the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and the University of Chicago. But what makes the city so unique is that artists don’t just launch their careers here—they stay. “They build lasting practices in their communities and contribute to the city in ways that are truly meaningful,” she reflects, explaining that this staying power stems from Chicago’s rare combination of affordability, space and a robust support network of funders, collectors, peers and cultural workers.
Sanford Biggers, Promiscuous Platform, 2023; Estimate: $55,000-65,000. Courtesy of the artist and Monique Meloche Gallery
“The MCA is deeply proud to be an integral part of that ecosystem. We support artists through exhibitions, commissions, acquisitions, partnerships and long-term relationships,” Grynsztejn adds, pointing to programs like The New Art School Modality developed with Romi Crawford, which reimagines how institutions can nurture artistic thinking from the ground up. “Artists like Amanda Williams, Rashid Johnson, Nick Cave, Wafaa Bilal, Michael Rakowitz, Caroline Kent, Kerry James Marshall and Theaster Gates—who are core to the fabric of Chicago—have all intersected with the MCA in ways we’re honored to have supported. Many of them are also part of this year’s auction, which speaks to the depth and continuity of those relationships. We are incredibly grateful for their ongoing generosity and collaboration.”
Grynsztejn is quick to point out that Chicago has never lacked talent—what’s changed is the spotlight. “More people are paying attention,” she says, “and part of our job is to make sure that attention stays focused where it matters, on the artists building something here.”
An installation view of “Arthur Jafa: Works from the MCA Collection.” Photo: Robert Chase Heishman
An installation view of “Rosana Paulino – Diálogos do Dia e da Noite (Dialogues of the Day and of the Night)” at Mendes Wood DM. Kunning Huang
Brazilian artist Rosana Paulino has created a symbolic anthology that celebrates the lived experiences of Black women, exploring their pivotal role in Brazilian society and history while confronting enduring colonial narratives and stereotypes. Laden with symbolism and driven by a free flow of the subconscious, her lexicon draws profound philosophical inspiration from ancestral Brazilian spirituality, yet is firmly rooted in biology and, more specifically, botany. “I was thinking about the psychology of Black females, about femininity and its power. I started to research goodness, which has been represented since ancient times,” she tells Observer when we catch up with the artist following the opening of her U.S. debut at Mendes Wood DM in New York.
“We have Greek goddesses and others in different mythologies, but none are Black, even if we look back to ancient Egypt,” Paulino points out. “In Brazil, we have the Orishas, and all this mythology is very strong in the country.” The Orishas, Yoruba goddesses symbolizing the sacred feminine, draw from an ancient, complex cosmology rooted in Black African spiritual, philosophical and cultural traditions. Yet Paulino’s interest was not confined to culturally specific readings. She sought to tap into a more universal archetype—one that transcended these boundaries while resisting the Western lens of exoticism. “I started making drawings not directly tied to the Orishas but thinking about the psychology of Black women. And I realized it was impossible to do that without thinking about nature and its power, and how Black women have harnessed that strength to sustain their families and entire communities.”
Artist Rosana Paulino. Rodrigo Ladeira
Building on this foundation, Paulino developed her own symbolic vocabulary, which fully unfolds in her solo exhibition, where she continues to evolve her ongoing series Senhora das Plantas. Roots and branches of mangroves emerge from limbs, symbolizing fertility and nourishment, but also serving as threshold beings between worlds. These mangroves act as portals between the living and the dead, the material and the spiritual, embodying guardianship, maternal strength and resistance. As such, they protect initiation, transformation and delicate spiritual crossings. “The symbols just come,” Paulino says. “I’ve always loved nature. When I was younger, I thought I might become a biologist.”
Her visual language draws from her deep understanding of plants, and she deliberately chooses species for their social, cultural and spiritual meanings, as well as their healing and sacred roles. While Paulino grew up in the urban environment of São Paulo, she maintained ties with ancestral traditions passed down through her mother, often unconsciously. “My mother was Catholic, but even being a Catholic person, she used some medicines for practices that came from Black religions,” she says. “I think she wasn’t aware of this, but she used this interiorized knowledge—I have some initiated santo in my family—so I grew up in a family where if you go to a plant and want to use it, for example, you have to ask permission. You don’t do this without asking the plant or animals. They deserve respect.”
A similar understanding informs Paulino’s mural The Creation of the Creatures of Day and Night, on view at the High Line through December. Part of her acclaimed Mangrove series, Paulino depicts hybrid tree-women figures that serve as mythological archetypes and symbols of Brazil’s endangered biomes, drawing poignant connections between the colonial exploitation of Brazil’s natural environment and the historical violence inflicted on Black and Indigenous peoples. She urges viewers to see humanity as part of a broader, interdependent ecosystem defined by delicate critical balances and governed by cyclical processes of life, death and regeneration.
The plants, weeds and flowers that grow from and within the paintings in the exhibition are abundant in gardens throughout Brazil. Courtesy of the artist and Mendes Wood DM
This sense of reverence also comes to life in a series of multimedia installations and sculptures that resemble improvised votive altars with offerings to nature, feminine deities or ancestral spirits. Through these works, Paulino honors the long-neglected, erased or denied role of Black women in Brazilian society and, more broadly, in the country’s cultural and historical continuity. Her work highlights their essential role in preserving Brazil’s deepest ancestral traditions and maintaining its vital, living connection to the natural world.
As the title suggests, Paulino also turns her focus to the perpetual, vital cycle of light and darkness that nourishes specific plants with distinct properties. Some plants are meant to sustain us in waking life, while others guide us toward alternative realms: dreams, the subconscious and healing hallucinations. For her, this elemental dialogue between light and dark reflects a deeper dialectic between the conscious and unconscious, between empirical science and other equally vital forms of knowing. “Science is a kind of knowledge that Western people consider very rational,” she explains, “but we have another kind of knowledge, too—one more rooted in feeling, in sensing nature and the energies that surround us.” Her work creates a space where this ancestral wisdom, spiritual insight and the collective subconscious do not oppose science but are in conversation with it.
Despite the mystical and spiritual dimension that permeates her practice, Paulino makes it clear that a political message lies at its core—one that centers social, racial and gender issues. “Brazilian religion and spirituality have been used so much, to the point where people start to perceive them as something ‘exotic,’” she says. “But that term refers to something that doesn’t belong to a place. We are the majority of people in this country. I don’t like tying my work directly to religion. I like to focus on the ethics of it as a different way of relating to nature—something that came before.” It is an ancestral mode of thinking, shared across early civilizations that regarded human beings as part of a broader, interconnected system, equal among other forms of life, beyond notions of race or species.
For this reason, Paulino sought to anchor her artistic practice in science, undertaking a deep analysis of how specific scientific structures and colonial-era evolutionary theories have been used to construct narratives justifying racial superiority. In the exhibition, she reproduces anatomical drawings of Black women, reworking these so-called “scientific” images through her own poetic and symbolic language. In doing so, she reframes them as visual testaments to the spiritual and energetic force embedded in these bodies, not only as sensitive human beings but also as beings perhaps even more attuned to the universe and its underlying balance. More than one work directly addresses this tension between reverence for science—Amor por la ciencia—and the critique of the lingering violence of a Permanência da estrutura, a structure that has long served to justify social hierarchies and racial narratives in Brazilian society.
Rosana Paulino, Três Vezes Coração, 2024. Courtesy of the artist and Mendes Wood DM, São Paulo, Brussels, Paris, New York / Photo: EstudioEmObra
“Nos Tenemos” is inscribed in bold red across a large piece that features anatomical renderings of a man and a woman. A study of the brain—res cogitans, the seat of rationality—overlays the male figure, while a scientifically precise drawing of the Earth appears over the female body, as the res extensa, here conceived as an emotional, psychological and spiritual extension of the body. Between them is a visceral representation of the heart in vivid red, as if she is mapping not just the internal systems of the body but also the emotional and cosmic pulse that binds them.
The Black female body appears in the gallery as a vibrant force and vessel of care and love that sustains life. “It’s very difficult to be Black in Brazil, and even more so to be a Black woman,” Paulino reflects. “However, even in the face of all these challenges, we built a country. It’s astonishing how this group has truly contributed to building a nation and to shaping a culture, leaving such a strong imprint. There’s so much generosity in that, and there’s resilience, too.” This nurturing power is especially visible in her personal mythopoiesis, which unfolds through drawings where the female body becomes a site of rooting and germination. New plants—new life—emerge from these figures. “When we see these women, we see roots growing out of them. We carry that within us. We carry life coming from them.” Considering these symbolic images, she adds, “We have all this life emerging from them, like great trees, so generous with us. I think that’s what life is about.”
Although Paulino’s language often moves in symbolic or even shamanic registers, a closer analysis of the work reveals a framework grounded in science and philosophy—specifically in a post-structuralist critique that challenges the foundations of both anthropological and psychosocial constructions. These are the very structures that, historically, have exercised power not only through scientific discourse but also through the strategic invention of myths and cultural narratives.
As contemporary theories of archetypes remain largely dominated by Western, Jungian-centered perspectives, Paulino is concerned with the issue of archetypes and psychology—”a Black female psychology.” She aims to construct an alternative mythology, narrative and epistemological system—both scientific and political—that can shield the power of Black women from erasure and demonization. At the same time, she resists the reductive, exoticizing tendencies that frame Black femininity solely through healing or fertility, without acknowledging its full complexity and agency. “Today, violence against Black communities continues in Brazil,” she says. “This is an ongoing reality. We need to talk about it and examine the roots of the problem, including the role that science has played in militarized societies like Brazil and elsewhere.”
Rosana Paulino, Untitled, Sem título, 2025. Courtesy of the artist and Mendes Wood DM, São Paulo, Brussels, Paris, New York / Photo: EstudioEmObra
When asked whether her work is more political than spiritual, Paulino answers without hesitation: “Like homeopathy, where the principle is to cure with the same substance that caused the illness, I use the same visual language—those anatomical diagrams of the human body once used to justify supremacist ideologies. I think it’s much more effective.”
In these images, we discern a dual gesture: the unveiling of a visual language historically employed to legitimize racial stereotypes, while simultaneously reclaiming that same terrain as fertile ground for an ancestral symbolism that honors the true essence of these energetic, healing bodies. Bodies that, notably, may hold crucial knowledge about a different way of relating to nature and the world around us—a paradigm our civilization has largely forgotten, often to its detriment.
That’s why, Paulino emphasizes throughout our conversation, her work is grounded in a specific ethical stance, even before any spirituality. Ultimately, her work is about an ethic of care for the environment and all life forms. “It’s the knowledge of these communities that can save the world,” she says, “because we see ourselves as part of nature, not superior to it, like the Western mindset suggests. We’re just one species. One more among many, within nature. That’s the message.”
Sarah Paulson, Jane Fonda and Wendy Schmidt. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Last week, some of the biggest names in art and architecture, film and fashion, politics and philanthropy, spent a night celebrating the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art’s impact—and the impact others have had on it. The institution’s spring gala, organized in partnership with BVLGARI, collected L.A.’s leading figures in the worlds of art, culture and philanthropy at The Geffen Contemporary to celebrate three “MOCA Legends”: Chicago-based artist and professor Theaster Gates, whose spirit-guided work reckons with Black space; Frank Gehry, the legendary Canadian-American architect recognized for postmodern subversions; and entrepreneur and philanthropist Wendy Schmidt. After filmmaker Ava DuVernay, actress and activist Jane Fonda and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosiintroduced the night’s honorees, GRAMMY-nominated rapper Tierra Whack kept the crowd energized with songs from her albums World Wide Whack and Whack World.
They weren’t the only ones to strut before the step-and-repeat, of course. More than 600 artists, patrons and cultural movers and shakers gathered that night to listen to MOCA director Johanna Burton, MOCA chair Maria Seferian and the three honorees hold forth on art’s profound connective powers before a sunset-ombre backdrop. The evening also included a ceremonial process led by Japanese drum ensemble TAIKOPROJECT and a special viewing of Icelandic-Danish artist Olafur Eliasson’s newest exhibition, “Olafur Eliasson: OPEN.”
As is usually the case with the best art parties, a DJ set and dessert finished out the festivities. “Art is about living a life where you take your talents, and you multiply them,” Gates remarked when he took his turn at the dais. All told, the gala raised over $3.1 million that will help ensure MOCA’s impact is similarly multiplied.
Ava DuVernay, Nancy Pelosi, Johanna Burton, Theaster Gates, Frank Gehry, Wendy Schmidt and Maria Seferian
Ava DuVernay, Nancy Pelosi, Johanna Burton, Theaster Gates, Frank Gehry, Wendy Schmidt and Maria Seferian. Jojo Korsh/BFA.com
Karyn Kohl and Sarah Paulson
Karyn Kohl and Sarah Paulson. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Josh Hutcherson
Josh Hutcherson. Jojo Korsh/BFA.com
Alexandra Hedison and Sarah Paulson
Alexandra Hedison and Sarah Paulson. Jojo Korsh/BFA.com
Theaster Gates
Theaster Gates. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Jason Swartz and Conor Tingley
Jason Swartz and Conor Tingley. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Julie Wainwright
Julie Wainwright. Jojo Korsh/BFA.com
Katherine Ross, Michael Govan, Esthella Provas, Eugenio Lopez, Analisse Taft, Celesta Hodge and Maria Seferian
Katherine Ross, Michael Govan, Esthella Provas, Eugenio López Alonso, Analisse Taft, Celesta Hodge and Maria Seferian. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Andrea Bowers
Andrea Bowers. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Nancy Pelosi, Johanna Burton and Karen Bass
Nancy Pelosi, Johanna Burton and Karen Bass. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Pia Mehta
Pia Mehta. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Ava DuVernay and Frank Gehry
Ava DuVernay and Frank Gehry. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Efsun Erkılıç and Refik Anadol
Efsun Erkılıç and Refik Anadol. Jojo Korsh/BFA.com
Marcel Alcalá and Carlye Packer
Marcel Alcalá and Carlye Packer. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Mary Weatherford, Zoe Ryan and Jarl Mohn
Mary Weatherford, Zoe Ryan and Jarl Mohn. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Viktoria Modesta
Viktoria Modesta. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Olafur Eliasson
Olafur Eliasson. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Nadya Tolokonnikova, Jane Fonda and Edythe Broad
Nadya Tolokonnikova, Jane Fonda and Edythe Broad. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Carolyn Clark Powers and Maria Seferian
Carolyn Clark Powers and Maria Seferian. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Terri Smooke and Esthella Provas
Terri Smooke and Esthella Provas. Marc Patrick/BFA.com
Pascal Dagnan-Bouveret, La Blanchisseuse (The Laundress), 1879; graphite, ink and ink wash on paper. Private collection, California. Courtesy of Schiller & Bodo European Paintings
“The First Homosexuals: The Birth of a New Identity, 1869-1939,” an exhibit at Wrightwood 659 in Chicago, is enormous and overwhelming, very much in contrast to the museum, which, nestled on a residential street, looks modest and unassuming. Inside, though, it is spacious with three full exhibition floors positively crammed with paintings, sculpture, photographs, prints and a novel’s worth of explanatory text chronicling the development of, regimentation of and gaps within homosexual, lesbian and queer identities. The show is stunning, energizing and exhausting.
That was the intent, according to Johnny Willis, associate curator of the exhibit along with Jonathan David Katz. “It’s what we were going for: an overwhelming experience,” Willis told Observer. The curators wanted visitors to be “overwhelmed with the sheer scale of the contributions of queer and trans artists, and also how that’s been overlooked in art history and in museums.”
Searching outside the Western canon widens the scope of that contribution considerably. Europe in the 19th Century, which is when the terminology of “homosexuality” developed, was in most respects more homophobic and more censorious than other cultures, and the exhibit provides images demonstrating the range and diversity of gender and sexual identity and practice across the world.
The early part of the show includes a mid-19th-century hand-painted Japanese scroll signed by “Tamechika” showing a young man having sex with both women and older male lovers in a seamless sequence without censure or much distinction. An 1800 cloth painting by Saya Chone depicts the royal family of Burma with no marks of gender difference, demonstrating the culture’s validation of androgynous beauty. Western painter George Catlin paints a vivid depiction of a Sac and Fox feast for Two-Spirit people (to which Catlin appended his own transphobic and racist commentary).
Saya Chone, Royal Family, late 19th Century; gouache on cloth. Collection of Fukuoka Asian Art Museum
Even broader than the geographical diversity, perhaps, is the dizzying array of queer portrayal, recognition, identity and understanding. “Homosexual” was first used as a term in Germany in 1869. Before that, people might have sex with a range of people without those sexual encounters defining their identities; afterward, who you slept with or wanted to sleep with became (to a greater or lesser extent) who you were.
The creation of the homosexual/heterosexual binary was, in some ways, a step toward greater visibility and more political rights. In other ways, it was a step toward increased stigma and oppression. But what the Wrightwood 659 exhibit demonstrates is that even as terms became more fixed and less flexible, queer sexual expression took on a dizzying range of forms, expressions and contexts.
Some of these contexts remain visible or legible to us today. Wealthy American coal baron Romaine Brooks’ 1923 self-portrait in male attire was a shockingly frank declaration of lesbian identity at the time, and it still says what it says a century later. Andreas Andersen’s 1894 painting of his brother Hendrik waking up nude beside American painter John Briggs Potter couldn’t be much more frank, then or now.
Janet Cumbrae, Stewart, La Biondina (The Blonde), 1920s; pastel on paper. Private collection / Image: Jessica Maurer
In other instances, though, identity relies on signs and representations that no longer resonate in quite the same way because identity and representation change over time. A sailor in a painting or a classical scene doesn’t instantly mean what it meant, though people in the know still know. But Pascal Adolphe Jean Dagnan-Bouveret’s 1879 graphite and ink drawing La Blanchisseuse (The Laundress) requires expert translation for most viewers. The image shows two men strolling by the Seine in Paris while a laundress sits on a bench, pointedly ignoring them. The wall text explains that laundresses at the time often had to make ends meet by doubling as sex workers. Her lack of interest in the men signifies that they are not customers because they aren’t interested in women. Identity here is created through a carefully deployed knowledge of sexual marginalization, both winking and affectionate.
Other artists create a landscape of desire that is either idiosyncratic or reflects a context that is now lost. Lesbian Australian painter Janet Cumbrae Stewart created canvases like the 1926 La Biondina (The Blonded), which portrayed nude women from behind. The wall text suggests this was a way to refuse a sexualized gaze or replace commodification with “gentle eroticism.” But the view from the back also de-emphasizes or obscures gender; it could be seen as a kind of male drag, performed by removing rather than donning clothing. Is the reversal here really gentle or less possessive? Or is the artist expressing her own erotic preferences and her own erotic gaze through an inversion which obscures its own intent by focusing on it so openly?
The way in which Stewart’s painting focuses desire on androgynous or “male” aspects of a woman’s body highlights the way in which sexuality and gender identities were not rigorously distinguished during the 19th and early 20th Centuries in most queer communities and representations. “You can’t tell gay history without trans history,” Willis explained. “From the very beginning, when these theorists were inventing sexual identity categories in the 19th Century, the very first definitions proposed that gay men had a female soul and a male body and that lesbians had a male soul and a female body. From the get-go, gay and trans are born together and they grow up together.”
Romaine Brooks, Self-Portrait, 1923; oil on canvas, 46 1/4 x 26 7/8 in. (117.5 x 68.3 cm). Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of the artist, 1966.49.1
Part of that intertwined history is the history of persecution. The exhibit includes photos of the Nazi book burnings at the Institute of Sexology, which created pioneering, and now lost, research on trans and queer people. It also acknowledges present-day fascist attacks on LGBT people. A frank androgynous 1928 self-portrait drawing by Colombian artist Hena Rodriguez is represented here by a reproduction because the lender feared that the Trump administration might attempt to seize and destroy the artwork. The Slovak National Gallery agreed to send two paintings by Baron László Mednyánszky of working-class men, but the government of Slovakia blocked the loan at the last minute. More than 100 curators and staff of that museum have resigned due to right-wing attacks on the institution.
Hatred of queer people has, as the exhibit makes clear, been a part of Western modernity for as long as queer people have existed as a concept and likely before. Hatred doesn’t need logic or a reason, and “The First Homosexuals” does not try to explain it. But walking through the show, looking at so many different visions of desire and self and the relationship between the two, it’s hard not to think that the fascists are so afraid of homosexuality and queerness because they hate the fact that humanity and love take on too many forms and too many lives to be catalogued or policed. “The First Homosexuals” is overwhelming, in part, because human beings of whatever gender and sexuality are—delightfully, bafflingly, gloriously—overwhelming, too.
Unlike standard self-storage, fine art storage facilities offer purpose-built environments designed to house and protect artworks under tightly controlled conditions. Courtesy Fortress
What is the afterlife of an artwork? After a piece’s creation, it emerges briefly into public view, and—if fortunate—is acquired and shown again elsewhere. But if the work is valuable enough, its fate is often more static: soon after its creation (in the case of contemporary art) or its sale (in the case of works by a deceased artist), a painting or sculpture may be sealed in a crate and consigned to long-term storage, disappearing from sight for years, if not decades. And so alongside the art market, the fine art storage industry has expanded significantly, with buyers, dealers and museums not only in the U.S. but around the world acquiring more and more objects that people and even institutions no longer have room for.
The length of time artworks remain in crates at storage facilities varies widely, “from a few weeks to decades,” Thomas Burns, chief operating officer at fine art storage company Fortress Storage, told Observer. The shorter-term leases tend to be for clients “who are in a period of transition in their lives; people move, die, get divorced,” and need a place to put things until life settles. Other art investors “hope that pieces increase in value in years to come” and will let them sit in crates until that time arrives. And some place artworks in freeports—custom-free storage sites in the U.S. and elsewhere that allow buyers to avoid sales and use taxes as well as tariffs.
The two largest players in the fine art storage industry are UOVO, which launched in 2014 with one 280,000-square-foot site in Long Island City and now operates thirty locations across the country totaling 1.5 million square feet, and Crozier, which has two million square feet of storage space across forty sites worldwide.
They offer a solution for a world of too much, beginning with artists who increasingly work at a large scale to align with the demands of international art fairs, where bigger is de rigueur. These larger artworks require commercial galleries to maintain expansive showrooms for temporary exhibitions. After the show, “dealers have to store it, then they sell it to collectors who have to store it, then they donate it to museums that have to store it,” New York City art advisor Todd Levin told Observer.
Museums, foundations, gallery owners and private collectors are the primary clients of these facilities. Collectors make up the bulk of art storage clients, but museums provide the greatest volume of objects to store. And it’s worth noting that the need for storage is a broader cultural phenomenon, of which fine art storage is just one segment. There are currently more than 52,000 self-storage facilities across the U.S., with the rate of new openings rising sharply, from an average of 439 per year between 2010 and 2019 to 735 per year between 2010 and 2023. (The pandemic boosted the self-storage sector.) Americans spend more than $45 billion annually to rent storage lockers by the week, month or year.
Fine art storage facilities differ from your local storage locker in several ways—the first being that they only accept objects of long-term value. “We don’t allow other types of things, like mattresses,” Nir Eshed, head of operations at Mana Contemporary, told Observer. “They might come with bed bugs and roaches,” which could infest the entire facility. And at $30 to $60 per square foot—the rate Mana charges clients for storage units—it’s probably cheaper to just buy a new mattress anyway.
Cost is another differentiator. According to the Journal of Consumer Research, the average monthly cost of a standard commercial five-by-five-foot self-storage unit is $90. At Fortress Storage, the lowest-priced vault is sixteen square feet priced at $250 per month. At the higher end, Fortress charges up to $10,000 per month for half a floor. Prices for art storage “range widely, based on the size of the space, the term of the lease and the market,” Caroline Page-Katz, chief operating officer and president of UOVO, told Observer. “New York City is a different market from Denver. There is more space to house a fine art storage facility in Denver than in Manhattan, which raises the price there.”
Climate-controlled and high-security vaults like those Fortress offers may house vast art collections or just a few pieces. Courtesy Fortress
Prices also vary depending on whether one rents a private room or stores crated objects in shared spaces. Some artworks are physically small but, once packed and crated, occupy considerable volume because crates are never stacked to prevent accidents from falls. That means even a modest number of works can require a relatively large and more expensive area.
But what actually makes facilities like Fortress, UOVO and Crozier so much more expensive than self-storage units is that these buildings are climate-controlled to museum standards (70°F, 50 percent relative humidity) and feature comprehensive security protocols. Many, though not all, have round-the-clock staffing to deter break-ins and immediately address any system failures. Fine art storage facilities are almost always single-use buildings, meaning they do not share space with unrelated tenants and are equipped with backup generators in case of power outages. (Self-storage sites, by contrast, are more akin to garages and susceptible to extreme temperature fluctuations and security breaches.)
Private collectors often receive reduced premiums on fine art insurance when storing works off site. “Insurance companies don’t like art in houses that only have monitoring systems,” Levin explained.
That isn’t to say accidents and thefts never occur at fine art storage sites—only that they are rare or at least rarely reported. A fire at Momart’s east London warehouse in 2004 destroyed hundreds of works by Tracey Emin, Damien Hirst, Chris Ofili and other notable artists. A fire at Artex’s warehouse in Dedham, Massachusetts, in 2005 damaged and destroyed quite a lot of art. A 38-ton Richard Serra sculpture went missing in Madrid in 1990 after being placed in a fine art storage facility that went into receivership in 1998; the museum that owned it didn’t inquire about it until 2006. In another case, Fine Art Logistics in London mistakenly disposed of a 1984 sculpture by Anish Kapoor. And in 2005, two employees at Fine Arts Express in St. Louis were caught stealing $4 million in artworks, which they attempted to fence through third parties.
Security is a key concern at fine art storage sites, not only because of the high value of the contents but because the spaces are hubs of activity. Gallery owners come and go—sometimes showing works to potential buyers in on-site viewing rooms, other times simply exchanging crates. Museum curators rotate artworks between storage and their institutions’ galleries. Collectors or their staff may visit to photograph pieces or digitize records. “We have rooms for photo shoots and can custom build facilities for clients,” James Hendy, senior vice president and general manager at Crozier, told Observer. “We can also provide digitizing and archival services for clients, if they like.”
Crozier and UOVO employ specially trained art handlers to pack, unpack and move works for collectors, dealers and institutions. Their climate-controlled vans and trucks are deployed during hurricanes, wildfires or other emergencies, and for less dramatic relocations like summer moves. And that brings us to the final differentiating factor. At facilities like those, storing art is only the beginning.
Patrick Martinez, Cost of Living, 2025. Photo: Faith Ninivaggi
Biennials and triennials are proliferating across the globe, often launched by local governments as tools for tourism and city branding. But these art events risk weakening ties with the very communities and territories they claim to elevate—the foundations from which meaningful development should arise—when outsiders are at the helm. The inaugural edition of the Boston Public Art Triennial, by contrast, is grounded first and foremost in two essential elements: a deep understanding of the local community and a sensitivity to the city’s social and natural ecologies.
In the 2025 Boston Public Art Triennial, artworks and artists are not parachuted into the city as spectacles, but rather positioned as catalysts for resonant exchanges rooted contextually in the city. Leading the initiative is artistic director Pedro Alonzo, an internationally recognized curator with extensive experience in biennials and public art, but also someone profoundly embedded in the local landscape, having lived in Boston for years and raised his children there. Cognizant of the global glut of biennials, Alonzo set out to create something thoughtful and truly impactful—something that could stand apart. His point of departure was a deceptively simple but critical set of context-specific questions: Where are we? What is happening here? “I realized the best way to do that was to understand the city and to do something meaningful for its reality,” he tells Observer.
Where many curatorial statements drift into academic opacity—more convoluted than the exhibitions they purport to articulate—Alonzo has opted for clarity, centering the Boston Public Art Triennial on a direct, accessible theme that also functions as its curatorial engine: art as a tool and catalyst for exchange and conversation. “So the premise of the show is the exchange of ideas and how we influence each other,” he says as he walks us through a series of public installations. Working within this dialectical framework, the Triennial embraces art’s transformative potential, aspiring to create genuine, lasting impact within the communities it engages.
Nicholas Galanin’s Aáni yéi xat duwasáakw (I am called Land), 2025. Courtesy the artist and Peter Blum Gallery, New York. Photo: Mel Taing ‘16.
Alonzo points out that artists don’t simply sit in isolation and conjure ideas from thin air—they’re deeply shaped by the world around them, by the urgent realities unfolding across the planet. In a city like Boston, home to extraordinary concentrations of talent—from medical research institutions to NGOs and organizations dedicated to social betterment, supporting the unhoused and the vulnerable—the potential for meaningful engagement is immense. “I realized this is a city operating on a global scale, with far-reaching impact. The question became: how can we connect artists to that energy, to those networks, and allow their work to respond, resonate and contribute to amplify or make more accessible or more impactful this knowledge and talent?”
Cognizant of the city’s density of excellence across disciplines, Alonzo conceived the Triennial first and foremost as a platform for cross-pollination—tapping into these nodes of local expertise and encouraging encounters between artists and specialists to foster dialogue around the urgent issues shaping both Boston and the world. In this way, rather than imposing curatorial themes from above, the Triennial lets them emerge organically from Boston’s lived realities and global entanglements, coalescing around four interwoven areas of inquiry: indigeneity, climate and biodiversity, health and recovery, and shared humanity.
Gabriel Sosa’s I want more celebrations, 2025. Photo by Mel Taing
According to Alonzo, Boston can be a siloed environment, where individuals often work inwardly, focused on their own disciplines—generating knowledge and sharing it primarily within their professional spheres. The challenge was to create connections and projects that could act as vessels—moving fluidly across disciplinary boundaries and transcending the limits of their original contexts. He believes artists have the power to humanize data and research, transforming them into tools that reconnect with society and serve the public good. “Experts often bombard us with data—but the delivery can be dry, overwhelming, even mind-numbing, and this rarely resonates on a human level. That’s where artists come in, crafting compelling visual narratives, which can create entry points that not only help people understand the issues but also humanize them, making the data feel real, urgent, and emotionally accessible.”
What to see at the Boston Public Art Triennial
Due to inclement weather, the Triennial initially opened at MassArt, one of the city’s participating institutions, with a solo exhibition and major site-specific installation by artist Nicholas Galanin, Aáni yéi xat duwasáakw (I am called Land). At its center, a robotic arm rhythmically strikes a rectangular wooden box, hand-painted with the image of a child and delicately suspended from organic ropes. Surrounding it, an immersive video envelops the viewer in a liquid world—one of creation, germination, transformation and human evolution—evoking the primordial waters from which everything begins. The rhythmical beating of the arm feels ritualistic once it synchronizes with the heartbeats. Yet embedded in this rhythm is also quiet violence—the relentless advance of technological progress confronting the endurance of ancestral tradition and the suppressed but still-extant knowledge of Indigenous cosmologies. The heartbeat becomes a ticking clock in a densely symbolic installation that unsettles and demands a reckoning with the contradictions of our civilization.
Not far away, in Evans Park, Galanin presents a bronze sculpture: the totemic figure of an Indigenous hero, now rendered in robotic form. Stooped or perhaps surrendering, the figure honors the fractured, enduring ruins of Indigenous culture and technological wisdom, distorted but not erased by the violence of colonization. Conceived as a counter-monument, it resists the epic language of triumph to instead expose the ruptures, assimilations and erasures enacted by settler-colonial fantasies—ironically cast in bronze, a medium long used to glorify conquest and subjugation.
Operating primarily in the realm of public art, many of the works in the Triennial confront dominant narratives enshrined in traditional monuments by proposing counter-monuments, which either subvert and reshape conventional aesthetics or play openly with cultural stereotypes. Not far from Galanin’s installation, atop the pillars at the entrance to the MFA Boston’s square—visibly marked by the corporate patronage of Bank of America—artist Alan Michelson has installed two statues of contemporary Indigenous cultural stewards: Aquinnah Wampanoag member Julia Marden and Nipmuc descendant Andre StrongBearHeart Gaines Jr. Standing as guardians, The Knowledge Keepers welcome visitors as quiet yet powerful reminders of another American history—one rooted in long-erased, long-neglected forms of knowledge now beginning to be acknowledged as essential to the American identity. Cast in bronze and gilded in gleaming platinum, the sculptures also speak to the extractive violence of colonial and capitalist expansion, invoking how mining and resource exploitation have desecrated sacred lands and disrupted ancestral ecological balances.
Nicholas Galanin’s I think it goes like this (pick yourself up), 2025. Photo: Faith Ninivaggi
A similar, though more humorous, critique of colonial stereotypes takes shape in one of Boston’s most popular and touristic—yet also most historically fraught—sites: Quincy Market. Once a slave market, today it is a stage for patriotic performance, devoted to celebrating and thanking the so-called founders of the United States, often through the sanitized mythology of Thanksgiving. Here, the collective New Red Order has installed a larger-than-life, deliberately exuberant caricature of Thomas Morton, a rebellious Puritan defector whose long-suppressed story reminds us that alternative trajectories in the making of America were not only possible, but once real. Deserting the rigid dogma of the Pilgrims, Morton founded the far more liberal Merrymount Colony, which, despite its infamous indulgences and excesses, embraced a more open model of coexistence and exchange with Indigenous communities. In this intentionally eccentric monument, familiar symbols drawn from Boston pop culture, civic statuary and sports mascots are merged with the Tlingit sculptural tradition of “shame poles”—totemic forms erected to mark failure, debt or disgrace. The sculpture cleverly uses this mashup of stereotypes to trigger self-reflection, staging an inverted Boston Tea Party in which a red man links the corruption of the British state to its collusion with the East India Company—an effort to protect profits at all costs, lest Parliament lose its wealth.
During our conversation with Alonzo, people of all ages are pointing at the sculpture, commenting, discussing, snapping pictures—its magnetic pull on the general audience is undeniable. Rich in visual references that simultaneously riff on the fabricated mythos of Thanksgiving, Indigenous craft and knowledge systems, and their commercialized distortions, the statue evokes something between Disneyland and Luna Park—“something that Walt Disney could have made on an acid trip,” he says. And that is precisely why it works: familiar enough to engage, uncanny enough to provoke. As its absurdist and intentionally destabilizing roleplay unfolds, this countermonument challenges agency, memory and authorship in historical narration, confronting the aesthetic, cultural and ideological scaffolding that has long upheld distorted monuments and settler-colonial fantasies masquerading as national history.
New Red Order, Material Monument to Thomas Morton (Playing Indian), 2025. Photo: Elisa Carollo
For Alonzo, curating for public spaces always begins with the audience in mind, but maintaining a balance is essential: the goal is to engage and draw the public in, not necessarily by pleasing or entertaining them but by using those very elements as entry points to provoke deeper critical reflection.
Challenging societal taboos and entrenched patterns of denial is also central to Patrick Martinez’s contribution to the Boston Public Art Triennial. Known for his signature neon works, which are often inspired by his native L.A. and incorporate his own phrases or quotes from iconic figures, Martinez, following Alonzo’s suggestion, has taken a different approach in Boston. Here, he collaborated with youth experiencing homelessness, working in partnership with the local organization Breaktime to listen, record and give visual form to their real words and lived experiences, illuminating uncomfortable truths that are too often ignored. “It was all at once overwhelming: deeply impactful, emotionally draining, beautiful and heartbreaking. These stories carried so much weight,” Alonzo says. “Then Patrick, with his incredibly generous presence, just stood there, listened intently, took notes, asked thoughtful questions, and engaged in real conversation. From those exchanges, he created twelve powerful neon signs.”
The difficulty of finding a site willing to display these works has become a testament to the disruption they provoke. At present, only two of Martinez’s neon signs are installed, visible in the windows of Breaktime’s own properties. “We’ve only been able to hang two because people don’t want to talk about homelessness,” Alonzo explains with obvious disappointment. Despite initial enthusiasm from various landlords to host a contemporary art installation, interest quickly vanished once Cost of Living (2025) revealed itself as a direct confrontation with economic precarity and systemic neglect. For Alonzo, however, that resistance only reinforces the project’s urgency. Securing a home for the remaining signs is not merely a logistical matter but also integral to the work itself and the civic experiment it continues to activate.
This experiment also lays bare the underlying power dynamics of central Boston, where nearly everything is owned or leased by large corporations, and small businesses are steadily vanishing. Similar challenges Alonzo encountered while working on other sites have turned the Triennial into a potent instrument for exposing the often-invisible structures of control embedded in public space. Notably, although the Triennial is organized with support from the city of Boston, it originated as a private initiative—an evolution of Now + There, founded in 2015 by patron Kate Gilbert—with the majority of its funding coming from private donors.
Swoon, In the Well: The Stories We Tell About Addiction, 2025. Cameron Kincheloe.
Another work similarly reveals the power of narratives and counter-narratives to confront and redeem personal and familial trauma, often shaped by broader societal discomfort. Artist Caledonia Curry, known as Swoon, draws from her upbringing on the outskirts of Boston to excavate her own experience growing up in a family affected by drug addiction, finding in the city’s writers and researchers not only the language to process it but also pathways toward healing and reconciliation. In the Well: The Stories We Tell About Addiction (2025) is a powerful work that, in many ways, anchors the Boston Triennial’s approach. Here, Swoon turns to the medium of fairy tales—the very stories that once offered her comfort in childhood—to humanize addiction and build alternative narratives around it. The work is informed by conversations with Boston-based medical researchers Judith Herman and Bessel van der Kolk, whose groundbreaking writings on the intrinsic link between trauma and addiction shaped not only the conceptual foundation of the piece and Swoon’s own personal understanding of recovery.
Located in Boston’s iconic Central Library, the installation appears to grow organically yet precariously from the atrium, occupying what Alonzo describes as a rare civic space where Boston’s social classes intersect, where difference dissolves into a collective body brought together through shared engagement with story, whether myth, fiction or science. In that sense, the library becomes a metaphorical commons, and the installation, a living organism rooted in the ground of shared stories and knowledge that unites people across societal divides. By adopting the fairy tale form—traditionally a pedagogical tool for introducing children to the world while reflecting adult flaws—Swoon gives her story a level of universality. In this narrative, the mother figure is cast as a witch, addicted to a toxic substance brewed in the toads’ well. Through this enchanted lens of imagination, Swoon challenges dominant perceptions of drug addiction: it is not about moral failure or lack of love, but rather a symptom of societal neglect and the collapse of systems meant to support healing and recovery.
Then, when one lifts their eyes and notices how this fragile structure sways beneath the weight of a massive U.S. flag hanging above, the installation transforms into a disquieting portrait of countless untold micro-histories across the country—stories that remain largely absent from the national identity that the flag is supposed to represent.
Laura Lima, Indistinct Dorm (Forma Indistinta), 2025. Photo: Luc Alonzo
In challenging the narrative and conceptual framework of the conventional biennial, the Boston Public Art Triennial also opened space for artists engaging with a broader notion of ecosystem that extends beyond the usual focus on human communities that biennials and public art projects are typically centered on. Perhaps the most striking example is the work of Brazilian artist Laura Lima. Known for working with “living materials,” Lima set out in Boston to create sculptures not for humans, but for animals. Radically subverting the anthropocentric paradigm that has shaped art since the Renaissance (and even earlier, in Ancient Greece), she initiated a dialogue with species-specific experts to design sculptures attuned to the behaviors, seasonal movements and needs of local fauna. “To make art for animals, it just automatically elevates them to another level and allows the art to turn into a tool to enhance their lives,” Alonzo says. Left outdoors, the works in In Indistinct Form (Forma Indistinta) evolve organically through interaction with animals, weather and the natural life cycle, caught in a continuum of generation, adaptation, evolution, survival and transformation. Working closely and simultaneously with wildlife specialists at Instituto Vida Livre in Rio de Janeiro and the Mass Audubon Boston Nature Center, Lima’s project became an unexpected but vital conduit for knowledge exchange between two ecosystems connected by migratory bird paths.
Julian Charrière also sought to connect Boston with global environmental concerns, relinquishing conventional notions of authorship in favor of a project grounded in presence and witness. His contribution to the Triennial consists of a continuous 24-hour livestream from the Amazon rainforest, allowing its force and life to unfold in real time before viewers. As the title suggests, Calls for Action is a work of environmental witness, designed to raise awareness and foster a sense of proximity between Boston and these remote and fragile yet globally essential ecosystems. Emerging from a collaborative effort with Art into Acres, Re:wild, the Brazilian Ministry of Indigenous Peoples, the National Foundation for Indigenous Peoples and regional conservation organizations, the project speaks directly to Boston’s large Brazilian population, building a bridge between the city and critical ecological concerns. Even more poignantly, as Alonzo reveals, Charrière chose to donate his artist’s fee entirely to land-reclamation initiatives led by Indigenous groups.
Meanwhile, L.A.-based artist Beatriz Cortez landed in the more industrial setting of Charlestown Navy Yard with a monumental structure that hovers somewhere between a whale’s carcass, a dystopian spaceship wreck and a melting iceberg. Conceived in response to Boston’s whaling history and inspired by the artist’s recent trip to the Arctic, the installation invites the viewer on an intimate journey of deep, empathic identification with the trauma of displacement and the survival of these animals. The voyage becomes a testament to the endurance of whales, entangled in the broader narratives of modernity, industrialization and the escalating urgency of global warming.
Julian Charrière’s Calls for Action, 2024, at the Triennial Hub at Lyrik. Photo: Mel Taing
As a fundamental resource for reshaping our paradigm of how we relate to the wider ecosystem, Indigenous artists and ancestral knowledge play a central role in this Triennial, offering pathways toward more sustainable, reciprocal relationships with the environment. While many might expect a Triennial in a tech-forward city like Boston to focus on emerging technologies, Alonzo chose instead to foreground ancestral technologies—alternative systems of development that, though historically marginalized, continue to offer critical lessons for a civilization increasingly aware of its own collapse. “When I started to look into the notion of technology, I began to see that artists were engaging with something more interesting than technological advancement and innovation: ancient forms of knowledge, deeper levels of understanding, vital things that we’ve forgotten or disregarded.”
Cannupa Hanska Luger has long explored the idea of “future ancestral technologies” in an approach rooted in the mechanics of science fiction as a form of “future dreaming rooted in continuum,” which allows for the imagining, prototyping and enactment of experiences that help Indigenous cultures not merely survive but thrive into the future.
In Boston, working within this framework, Hanska Luger contributes to the Triennial’s counter-narrative with Transmutation (2025), which fuses Indigenous futurism, speculative fiction and land-based restoration into the realm of public art, seeking to activate collective empathy and awareness. Two towering portals, each crowned with monumental buffalo skulls, frame a suspended mesh fabric adorned with thousands of ribbons, individually knotted and inscribed by community members. Through this act, the artist stages a communal ritual of mourning for the near-eradication of wild buffalo populations, while simultaneously honoring the resilience and knowledge of Indigenous communities. Past, present and future converge in this intricate weave of kinship, loss and renewal—held and activated through collective participation.
Even in the more spectacular, large-scale institutional presentations within the city’s major venues—such as Chiharu Shiota’s immersive installation at the ICA Watershed—the Triennial remains firmly rooted in the lived realities of Boston’s communities. In Home Less Home, the renowned Japanese artist interlaces her signature red threads and black ropes with paper documents—passports, letters, immigration forms and messages—that evoke the layered narratives of migration and displacement, but also of connection, memory and the shifting sense of home that defines a multicultural city like Boston. Similarly, in Accumulation – Searching for the Destination, dozens of vintage suitcases dangle from red strings and ropes, occasionally trembling or swaying like quiet omens, marking the anticipation, uncertainty and hope that accompany every journey toward a new beginning.
A poetic, text-based intervention by artist Gabriel Sosa installed at Tufts University echoes this call for resonance and connection. In a world marked by global uncertainty, the task, he reminds us, is to confront what remains real: pain, joy, trauma and hope. Created in collaboration with Maverick Landing Community Services, a local organization supporting families, community health and youth leadership, the project unfolds across the city as billboards, wheatpasted posters and handouts. Sosa subverts the bright, declarative aesthetics of commercial printing, transforming them into quiet meditations on the collective emotions, aspirations and tensions gathered through his sustained engagement with the diverse communities he met, listened to and exchanged with throughout the process.
The call for real encounters and genuine exchanges of experience and knowledge lies at the very heart of this Boston Public Art Triennial. Conceived as a living laboratory for testing the potential of shared space, the Triennial reminds us that it doesn’t take a grand monument or spectacular installation to make a lasting impression. Often, it emerges from the poetry and drama of the streets, the language of fairytales and the intimacy of honest conversation. It lives in the fluid exchange of interdisciplinary knowledge, in collaborations grounded in trust and proximity, and in the small but resonant acts that ripple through a city’s social and ecological fabric. Ultimately, it is through these grounded, reciprocal gestures that a biennial or triennial leaves its most enduring mark—one not merely inscribed in the landscape, but carried forward in the communities it touches.
Damien Hirst, The Virtues, 2021; estimate: £60,000-80,000. Phillips
Loved and hated in equal measure, Damien Hirst has always embodied the full-throttle provocation of the Young British Artists—fun, controversial and unapologetically brash. Though his market has seen fluctuations in recent years, demand remains strong because the artist-entrepreneur has expertly capitalized on his fame and brand. Hirst has produced an impressive range of works for all pockets, from disturbing museum pieces like his infamous formaldehyde animals to glittering gold fossils destined for resorts and casinos and more approachable editions that speak to entry-level collectors.
The popularity—and notoriety—of Britain’s perennial enfant terrible was evident last month when robbers rammed a blue Mercedes into the front window of a Mayfair auction house. Police believe the dramatic entry was an attempt to steal one of Hirst’s works scheduled to hit the block at Phillips on Thursday, June 5, with a high estimate of £80,000. According to authorities, no arrests have been made, but the investigation is ongoing.
Phillips London is again going all in with a standalone live sale dedicated entirely to Damien Hirst, showcasing key editions from across his career at various price points. “Damien Hirst remains one of the most influential and collectible artists of our time,” specialist Rebecca Tooby-Desmond, head of the sale, told Observer. “The market for the artist’s work continues to show strong global demand, attracting both established collectors and a new generation of buyers, with collectors ranging in age from their early 20s to late 80s.”
The sale is calibrated to that range, offering a curated selection of editions and unique works on paper that span Hirst’s enduring obsessions with life, death and resurrection—from early spot etchings and kaleidoscopic butterfly prints to his more recent cherry blossom paintings. Among the highlights is the complete Where the Land Meets the Sea series, released at Phillips in 2023, and The Virtues, a standout from his celebrated eight-part Cherry Blossoms, which debuted at Fondation Cartier pour l’art contemporain in Paris in 2021. That show—Hirst’s first major solo exhibition in France—was a strategic attempt to relaunch his market and later traveled to The National Art Center in Tokyo, marking his debut solo outing in Japan as well.
During Frieze week in 2022, Damien Hirst burnt thousands of physical artworks that corresponded to NFTs. Photo by Jeff Spicer/Getty Images)
Though Hirst’s market has wavered in recent years, he’s proven remarkably adept at reigniting interest, whether by jumping into NFTs or, more recently, planning his posthumous career. In July 2021, Hirst launched a collection of 10,000 NFTs paired with corresponding physical artworks, giving collectors a choice: keep the NFT or exchange it for the physical piece. During that year’s Frieze Week, Hirst burned 4,851 physical works linked to NFTs in a theatrical, self-destructive gesture that questioned the value of art in its physical versus digital form while confronting issues of authenticity, originality and monetary value tied to both.
Damien Hirst is designing a posthumous practice measured in centuries
As he approaches his 60th birthday in just a few days, Damien Hirst has announced an audacious and on-brand plan to keep producing new work for 200 years after his death. He’s preparing 200 handwritten notebooks, each filled with detailed concepts for artworks to be executed—one per year—long after he’s gone. With this move, Hirst isn’t merely trying to outlive his peers; he’s aiming to outlast the art world itself, pushing the Warholian factory model to its most extreme, time-defying conclusion: a perpetual machine for iconicity.
Like Warhol before him, Hirst has long been preoccupied with death: ironic, pop-tinged and existential in equal measure. Beneath the formaldehyde and gloss lies a deeper inquiry into the fleeting nature of beauty, the cycles of time and the inherent absurdity of human feeling—delivered with a wink and a scalpel.
Described as the richest British artist, Hirst saw his average selling price rise from £8,000 to £9,600 between 2021 and 2022, marking the high point of his recent market run. That range also reflects where the heat is: in the lower price band, where his prolific output remains most accessible. In 2024, Hirst’s total auction sales reached approximately $26.6 million across paintings, sculptures and editions, pushing him up the 2025 Hiscox Artist Top 100 ranking from the 16th to 12th position—keeping him firmly on the higher end of the list. His top auction result remains Lullaby Spring, a steel cabinet filled with thousands of hand-painted pills, which fetched £9.6 million ($19.2 million) at Sotheby’s London in June 2007.
A similar online-only auction held by Phillips last October brought in over £1 million with a 95 percent sell-through rate—further evidence of the artist’s strength in the print segment, which accounted for £2.4 million in sales in 2024. “With momentum continuing to build and his 60th birthday on June 7, this is a timely celebration of an artist whose impact on contemporary art remains profound,” Tooby-Desmond told Observer.
Set for June 5, the Hirst auction will launch Phillips’ Editions Week, which also includes prints and multiples by Pablo Picasso, Francis Bacon, Banksy, Andy Warhol and William Kentridge, alongside contemporary stars like Yoshitomo Nara, Grayson Perry and Harland Miller. Among the sale’s flashier entries: Banksy’s Flower Thrower Triptych (Grey) (2019), estimated at £100,000-150,000, and Kate Moss: Original Colourway (2005), with an estimate of £70,000-90,000. Picasso appears with Minotaure aveugle guidé par Marie-Thérèse au pigeon dans une nuit étoilée (est. £60,000–80,000) and a ceramic Vase au décor pastel (est. £10,000-15,000). And of course, Warhol—the king of the print market—is represented with African Elephant from his Endangered Species series and a complete set of his lurid Skulls (1976), offered at £60,000-80,000.
Damien Hirst, Exaltation, from Enter the Infinite (The Visions), 2016; estimate: £30,000-50,000. Phillips