Tag Archives: Social Media

How social media makes adolescence even harder



How social media makes adolescence even harder – CBS News










































Watch CBS News



The new dramedy “Eighth Grade,” about a painfully shy 13-year old stumbling through her last week of middle school, is the first film for writer-director Bo Burnham and for its young star, Elsie Fisher. But there’s more to the movie than the usual teen angst and acne. There’s the loneliness that, research tells us, is becoming more pervasive for young people as social media increases in influence. Tracy Smith talks with Burnham, and with San Diego State professor Jean Twenge, author of “iGen,” about how the internet is making adolescence even tougher.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Source link

Pet stars of Instagram



Pet stars of Instagram – CBS News










































Watch CBS News



Adorable animals that have gone viral on Instagram have also won their owners some lucrative sponsorships. Richard Schlesinger talks with Loni Edwards, whose firm, The Dog Agency, represents all kinds of pets whose social media stardom can bring some big bucks. (This story originally aired on April 15, 2018)

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Source link

Pop-ups are popping up all over



Pop-ups are popping up all over – CBS News










































Watch CBS News



More and more retail stores, restaurants, museums and other “experiences” are opening temporary spaces as “pop-up” operations. Some are proving so popular they’re staying in place longer than expected. Luke Burbank reports on a new twist in retail that is fueled in part by social media, and visits such pop-ups as Candytopia and 29Rooms.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Source link

Meta’s platforms showed hundreds of “nudify” deepfake ads, CBS News investigation finds

Meta has removed a number of ads promoting “nudify” apps — AI tools used to create sexually explicit deepfakes using images of real people — after a CBS News investigation found hundreds of such advertisements on its platforms.

“We have strict rules against non-consensual intimate imagery; we removed these ads, deleted the Pages responsible for running them and permanently blocked the URLs associated with these apps,” a Meta spokesperson told CBS News in an emailed statement. 

CBS News uncovered dozens of those ads on Meta’s Instagram platform, in its “Stories” feature, promoting AI tools that, in many cases, advertised the ability to “upload a photo” and “see anyone naked.” Other ads in Instagram’s Stories promoted the ability to upload and manipulate videos of real people. One promotional ad even read “how is this filter even allowed?” as text underneath an example of a nude deepfake

One ad promoted its AI product by using highly sexualized, underwear-clad deepfake images of actors Scarlett Johansson and Anne Hathaway. Some of the ads ads’ URL links redirect to websites that promote the ability to animate real people’s images and get them to perform sex acts. And some of the applications charged users between $20 and $80 to access these “exclusive” and “advance” features. In other cases, an ad’s URL redirected users to Apple’s app store, where “nudify” apps were available to download.

Meta platforms such as Instagram have marketed AI tools that let users create sexually explicit images of real people.

An analysis of the advertisements in Meta’s ad library found that there were, at a minimum, hundreds of these ads available across the company’s social media platforms, including on Facebook, Instagram, Threads, the Facebook Messenger application and Meta Audience Network — a platform that allows Meta advertisers to reach users on mobile apps and websites that partner with the company. 

According to Meta’s own Ad Library data, many of these ads were specifically targeted at men between the ages of 18 and 65, and were active in the United States, European Union and United Kingdom. 

A Meta spokesperson told CBS News the spread of this sort of AI-generated content is an ongoing problem and they are facing increasingly sophisticated challenges in trying to combat it.

“The people behind these exploitative apps constantly evolve their tactics to evade detection, so we’re continuously working to strengthen our enforcement,” a Meta spokesperson said. 

CBS News found that ads for “nudify” deepfake tools were still available on the company’s Instagram platform even after Meta had removed those initially flagged.

Meta platforms such as Instagram have marketed AI tools that let users create sexually explicit images of real people.

Deepfakes are manipulated images, audio recordings, or videos of real people that have been altered with artificial intelligence to misrepresent someone as saying or doing something that the person did not actually say or do. 

Last month, President Trump signed into law the bipartisan “Take It Down Act,” which, among other things, requires websites and social media companies to remove deepfake content within 48 hours of notice from a victim. 

Although the law makes it illegal to “knowingly publish” or threaten to publish intimate images without a person’s consent, including AI-created deepfakes, it does not target the tools used to create such AI-generated content. 

Those tools do violate platform safety and moderation rules implemented by both Apple and Meta on their respective platforms.

Meta’s advertising standards policy says, “ads must not contain adult nudity and sexual activity. This includes nudity, depictions of people in explicit or sexually suggestive positions, or activities that are sexually suggestive.”

Under Meta’s “bullying and harassment” policy, the company also prohibits “derogatory sexualized photoshop or drawings” on its platforms. The company says its regulations are intended to block users from sharing or threatening to share nonconsensual intimate imagery.

Apple’s guidelines for its app store explicitly state that “content that is offensive, insensitive,  upsetting, intended to disgust, in exceptionally poor taste, or just plain creepy” is banned.

Alexios Mantzarlis, director of the Security, Trust, and Safety Initiative at Cornell University’s tech research center, has been studying the surge in AI deepfake networks marketing on social platforms for more than a year. He told CBS News in a phone interview on Tuesday that he’d seen thousands more of these ads across Meta platforms, as well as on platforms such as X and Telegram, during that period. 

Although Telegram and X have what he described as a structural “lawlessness” that allows for this sort of content, he believes Meta’s leadership lacks the will to address the issue, despite having content moderators in place. 

“I do think that trust and safety teams at these companies care. I don’t think, frankly, that they care at the very top of the company in Meta’s case,” he said. “They’re clearly under-resourcing the teams that have to fight this stuff, because as sophisticated as these [deepfake] networks are … they don’t have Meta money to throw at it.” 

Mantzarlis also said that he found in his research that “nudify” deepfake generators are available to download on both Apple’s app store and Google’s Play store, expressing frustration with these massive platforms’ inability to enforce such content. 

“The problem with apps is that they have this dual-use front where they present on the app store as a fun way to face swap, but then they are marketing on Meta as their primary purpose being nudification. So when these apps come up for review on the Apple or Google store, they don’t necessarily have the wherewithal to ban them,” he said.

“There needs to be cross-industry cooperation where if the app or the website markets itself as a tool for nudification on any place on the web, then everyone else can be like, ‘All right, I don’t care what you present yourself as on my platform, you’re gone,'” Mantzarlis added. 

CBS News has reached out to both Apple and Google for comment as to how they moderate their respective platforms. Neither company had responded by the time of writing. 

Major tech companies’ promotion of such apps raises serious questions about both user consent and about online safety for minors. A CBS News analysis of one “nudify” website promoted on Instagram showed that the site did not prompt any form of age verification prior to a user uploading a photo to generate a deepfake image. 

Such issues are widespread. In December, CBS News’ 60 Minutes reported on the lack of age verification on one of the most popular sites using artificial intelligence to generate fake nude photos of real people. 

Despite visitors being told that they must be 18 or older to use the site, and that “processing of minors is impossible,” 60 Minutes was able to immediately gain access to uploading photos once the user clicked “accept” on the age warning prompt, with no other age verification necessary.

Data also shows that a high percentage of underage teenagers have interacted with deepfake content. A March 2025 study conducted by the children’s protection nonprofit Thorn showed that among teens, 41% said they had heard of the term “deepfake nudes,” while 10% reported personally knowing someone who had had deepfake nude imagery created of them.

Source link

Trump’s surgeon general pick criticizes others’ conflicts

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — President Donald Trump’s pick to be the next U.S. surgeon general has repeatedly said the nation’s medical, health and food systems are corrupted by special interests and people out to make a profit at the expense of Americans’ health.

Yet as Dr. Casey Means has criticized scientists, medical schools and regulators for taking money from the food and pharmaceutical industries, she has promoted dozens of health and wellness products — including specialty basil seed supplements, a blood testing service and a prepared meal delivery service — in ways that put money in her own pocket.

A review by The Associated Press found Means, who has carved out a niche in the wellness industry, set up deals with an array of businesses.

In her newsletter, on her social media accounts, on her website, in her book and during podcast appearances, the entrepreneur and influencer has at times failed to disclose that she could profit or benefit in other ways from sales of products she recommends. In some cases, she promoted companies in which she was an investor or adviser without consistently disclosing the connection, the AP found.

Means, 37, has said she recommends products that she has personally vetted and uses herself. She is far from the only online creator who doesn’t always follow federal transparency rules that require influencers to disclose when they have a “material connection” to a product they promote.

Still, legal and ethics experts said those business entanglements raise concerns about conflicting interests for an aspiring surgeon general, a role responsible for giving Americans the best scientific information on how to improve their health.

“I fear that she will be cultivating her next employers and her next sponsors or business partners while in office,” said Jeff Hauser, executive director of the Revolving Door Project, a progressive ethics watchdog monitoring executive branch appointees.

The nomination, which comes amid a whirlwind of Trump administration actions to dismantle the government’s public integrity guardrails, also has raised questions about whether Levels, a company Means co-founded that sells subscriptions for devices that continuously monitor users’ glucose levels, could benefit from this administration’s health guidance and policy.

Though scientists debate whether continuous glucose monitors are beneficial for people without diabetes, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has promoted their use as a precursor to making certain weight-loss drugs available to patients.

The aspiring presidential appointee has built her own brand in part by criticizing doctors, scientists and government officials for being “bought off” or “corrupt” because of ties to industry.

Means’ use of affiliate marketing and other methods of making money from her recommendations for supplements, medical tests and other health and dietary products raise questions about the extent to which she is influenced by a different set of special interests: those of the wellness industry.

Means earned her medical degree from Stanford University, but she dropped out of her residency program in Oregon in 2018, and her license to practice is inactive. She has grown her public profile in part with a compelling origin story that seeks to explain why she left her residency and conventional medicine.

“During my training as a surgeon, I saw how broken and exploitative the healthcare system is and left to focus on how to keep people out of the operating room,” she wrote on her website.

Means turned to alternative approaches to address what she has described as widespread metabolic dysfunction driven largely by poor nutrition and an overabundance of ultra-processed foods. She co-founded Levels, a nutrition, sleep and exercise-tracking app that can also give users insights from blood tests and continuous glucose monitors. The company charges $199 per year for an app subscription and an additional $184 per month for glucose monitors.

Means has argued that the medical system is incentivized not to look at the root causes of illness but instead to maintain profits by keeping patients sick and coming back for more prescription drugs and procedures.

“At the highest level of our medical institutions, there are conflicts of interest and corruption that are actually making the science that we’re getting not as accurate and not as clean as we’d want it,” she said on Megyn Kelly’s podcast last year.

But even as Means decries the influence of money on science and medicine, she has made her own deals with business interests.

During the same Megyn Kelly podcast, Means mentioned a frozen prepared food brand, Daily Harvest. She promoted that brand in a book she published last year. What she didn’t mention in either instance: Means had a business relationship with Daily Harvest.

Influencer marketing has expanded beyond the beauty, fashion and travel sectors to “encompass more and more of our lives,” said Emily Hund, author of “The Influencer Industry: The Quest for Authenticity on Social Media.”

With more than 825,000 followers on Instagram and a newsletter that she has said reached 200,000 subscribers, Means has a direct line into the social media feeds and inboxes of an audience interested in health, nutrition and wellness.

Affiliate marketing, brand partnerships and similar business arrangements are growing more popular as social media becomes increasingly lucrative for influencers, especially among younger generations. Companies might provide a payment, free or discounted products or other benefits to the influencer in exchange for a post or a mention. But most consumers still don’t realize that a personality recommending a product might make money if people click through and buy, said University of Minnesota professor Christopher Terry.

“A lot of people watch those influencers, and they take what those influencers say as gospel,” said Terry, who teaches media advertising and internet law. Even his own students don’t understand that influencers might stand to benefit from sales of the products they endorse, he added.

Many companies, including Amazon, have affiliate marketing programs in which people with substantial social media followings can sign up to receive a percentage of sales or some other benefit when someone clicks through and buys a product using a special individualized link or code shared by the influencer.

Means has used such links to promote various products sold on Amazon. Among them are books, including the one she co-wrote, “Good Energy”; a walking pad; soap; body oil; hair products; cardamom-flavored dental floss; organic jojoba oil; a razor set; reusable kitchen products; sunglasses; a sleep mask; a silk pillowcase; fitness and sleep trackers; protein powder and supplements.

She also has shared links to products sold by other companies that included “affiliate” or “partner” coding, indicating she has a business relationship with the companies. The products include an AI-powered sleep system and Daily Harvest, for which she curated a “metabolic health collection.”

On a “My Faves” page that was taken down from her website shortly after Trump picked her, Means wrote that some links “are affiliate links and I make a small percentage if you buy something after clicking them.”

It’s not clear how much money Means has earned from her affiliate marketing, partnerships and other agreements. Daily Harvest did not return messages seeking comment, and Means said she could not comment on the record during the confirmation process.

Means has raised concerns that scientists, regulators and doctors are swayed by the influence of industry, oftentimes pointing to public disclosures of their connections. In January, she told the Kristin Cavallari podcast “Let’s Be Honest” that “relationships are influential.”

“There’s huge money, huge money going to fund scientists from industry,” Means said. “We know that when industry funds papers, it does skew outcomes.”

In November, on a podcast run by a beauty products brand, Primally Pure, she said it was “insanity” to have people connected to the processed food industry involved in writing food guidelines, adding, “We need unbiased people writing our guidelines that aren’t getting their mortgage paid by a food company.”

On the same podcast, she acknowledged supplement companies sponsor her newsletter, adding, “I do understand how it’s messy.”

Influencers who endorse or promote products in exchange for payment or something else of value are required by the Federal Trade Commission to make a clear and conspicuous disclosure of any business, family or personal relationship. While Means did provide disclosures about newsletter sponsors, the AP found in other cases Means did not always tell her audience when she had a connection to the companies she promoted. For example, a “Clean Personal & Home Care Product Recommendations” guide she links to from her website contains two dozen affiliate or partner links and no disclosure that she could profit from any sales.

Means has said she invested in Function Health, which provides subscription-based lab testing for $500 annually. Of the more than a dozen online posts the AP found in which Means mentioned Function Health, more than half did not disclose she had any affiliation with the company.

Means also listed the supplement company Zen Basil as a company for which she was an “Investor and/or Advisor.” The AP found posts on Instagram, X and on Facebook where Means promoted its products without disclosing the relationship.

Though the “About” page on her website discloses an affiliation with both companies, that’s not enough, experts said. She is required to disclose any material connection she has to a company anytime she promotes it.

Representatives for Function Health did not return messages seeking comment through their website and executives’ LinkedIn profiles. Zen Basil’s founder, Shakira Niazi, did not answer questions about Means’ business relationship with the company or her disclosures of it. She said the two had known each other for about four years and called Means’ advice “transformational,” saying her teachings reversed Niazi’s prediabetes and other ailments.

“I am proud to sponsor her newsletter through my company,” Niazi said in an email.

While the disclosure requirements are rarely enforced by the FTC, Means should have been informing her readers of any connections regardless of whether she was violating any laws, said Olivier Sylvain, a Fordham Law School professor who was previously a senior adviser to the FTC chair.

“What you want in a surgeon general, presumably, is someone who you trust to talk about tobacco, about social media, about caffeinated alcoholic beverages, things that present problems in public health,” Sylvain said, adding, “Should there be any doubt about claims you make about products?”

Means isn’t the first surgeon general nominee whose financial entanglements have raised eyebrows.

Jerome Adams, who served as surgeon general from 2017 to 2021, filed federal disclosure forms that showed he invested in several health technology, insurance and pharmaceutical companies before taking the job — among them Pfizer, Mylan and UnitedHealth Group. He also invested in the food and drink giant Nestle.

He divested those stocks when he was confirmed for the role and pledged that he and his immediate family would not acquire financial interest in certain industries regulated by the Food and Drug Administration.

Vivek Murthy, who served as surgeon general twice, under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, made more than $2 million in COVID-19-related speaking and consulting fees from Carnival, Netflix, Estee Lauder and Airbnb between holding those positions. He pledged to recuse himself from matters involving those parties for a period of time.

Means has not yet gone through a Senate confirmation hearing and has not yet announced the ethical commitments she will make for the role.

Hund said that as influencer marketing becomes more common, it is raising more ethical questions, such as what past influencers who enter government should do to avoid the appearance of a conflict.

Other administration officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, have also promoted companies on social media without disclosing their financial ties.

“This is like a learning moment in the evolution of our democracy,” Hund said. “Is this a runaway train that we just have to get on and ride, or is this something that we want to go differently?”

___

Swenson reported from New York.

Source link

Reddit sues Anthropic over alleged

Social media platform Reddit sued the artificial intelligence company Anthropic on Wednesday, alleging that it is illegally “scraping” the comments of millions of Reddit users to train its chatbot Claude.

Reddit claims that Anthropic has used automated bots to access Reddit’s content despite being asked not to do so, and “intentionally trained on the personal data of Reddit users without ever requesting their consent.”

Anthropic said in a statement that it disagreed with Reddit’s claims “and will defend ourselves vigorously.”

Reddit filed the lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court in San Francisco, where both companies are based.

“AI companies should not be allowed to scrape information and content from people without clear limitations on how they can use that data,” said Ben Lee, Reddit’s chief legal officer, in a statement Wednesday.

Reddit licensing agreements

Reddit has previously entered licensing agreements with Google, OpenAI and other companies that are paying to be able to train their AI systems on the public commentary of Reddit’s more than 100 million daily users.

Those agreements “enable us to enforce meaningful protections for our users, including the right to delete your content, user privacy protections, and preventing users from being spammed using this content,” Lee said.

The licensing deals also helped the 20-year-old online platform raise money ahead of its Wall Street debut as a publicly traded company last year Among those who stood to benefit was OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who accumulated a stake as an early Reddit investor that made him one of the company’s biggest shareholders.

Claude and Alexa

Anthropic was formed by former OpenAI executives in 2021 and its flagship Claude chatbot remains a key competitor to OpenAI’s ChatGPT. While OpenAI has close ties to Microsoft, Anthropic’s primary commercial partner is Amazon, which is using Claude to improve its widely used Alexa voice assistant.

Much like other AI companies, Anthropic has relied heavily on websites such as Wikipedia and Reddit that are deep troves of written materials that can help teach an AI assistant the patterns of human language.

In a 2021 paper co-authored by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei — cited in the lawsuit — researchers at the company identified the subreddits, or subject-matter forums, that contained the highest quality AI training data, such as those focused on gardening, history, relationship advice or thoughts people have in the shower.

Anthropic in 2023 argued in a letter to the U.S. Copyright Office that the “way Claude was trained qualifies as a quintessentially lawful use of materials,” by making copies of information to perform a statistical analysis of a large body of data. It is already battling a lawsuit from major music publishers alleging that Claude regurgitates the lyrics of copyrighted songs.

But Reddit’s lawsuit is different from others brought against AI companies because it doesn’t allege copyright infringement. Instead, it focuses on the alleged breach of Reddit’s terms of use, and the unfair competition, it says, was created.

——

The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement that allows OpenAI access to part of AP’s text archives.

Source link

Social media fame fuels conservation efforts for Australia’s quokkas



Social media fame fuels conservation efforts for Australia’s quokkas – CBS News










































Watch CBS News



An island off the coast of Australia has become a beloved tourist destination due to its adorable resident. Quokkas are small marsupials and are an endangered species, but efforts to conserve them are going well — thanks, in part, to how photogenic they are.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Source link

Social media star



Social media star “The Dogist” talks new book, online fame – CBS News










































Watch CBS News



The U.S. is dog-obsessed, and social media star The Dogist has tapped into that love, garnering millions of followers for his candid photos of pups around the world. Elias Weiss Friedman, the photographer behind the account, sat down with Dana Jacobson to talk about his new book and how he was catapulted to online fame.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Source link

Student visa applicants advised to tread lightly as U.S. expands social media vetting

Counselors who work with foreign students eager to attend college in the U.S. are advising them to purge their social media accounts of posts that could attract the attention of U.S. State Department officials.

“Any new student who comes on board — especially an international student who doesn’t have a U.S. passport — we would be going through their social media with them and talk to them about what they are saying on Snapchat, in group chats,” said Kat Cohen, founder and CEO of IvyWise, an educational consultancy firm for college admissions. “Because, if the information comes off as being radical or anti-American in some way, it is not going to help them.”

The focus on international students’ online profiles follows a new push by the Trump administration to scrutinize social media accounts as part of the evaluation process for student visa applications. In a cable dated May 27 and obtained by CBS News, the State Department said it was preparing to expand social media screening and vetting. The agency did not specify exactly what type of content it would be looking for.

“President Trump will always put the safety of Americans first, and it is a privilege, not a right, to study in the United States,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. “Enhanced social media vetting is a commonsense measure that will help ensure that guests in our country are not planning to harm Americans, which is a national security priority.” 

The new vetting measures build upon an April statement from United States Citizenship and Immigration Services announcing that the agency will be taking into account “antisemitic activity on social media” as “grounds for denying immigration benefit requests.” 

No politics

Advisers who cater to international students applying to U.S. schools told CBS Moneywatch they are reluctant to advise them to delete their social media accounts outright. But they are urging students to eliminate political-themed posts, especially if they relate to controversial topics such as the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. IvyWise also discourages foreign students from reposting any information they haven’t verified themselves, given that it might be inaccurate. 

“We don’t think students should delete their social media accounts completely,” Cohen said. “But we do need to make sure we go through their social media accounts with them to make sure that they are presenting themselves in the best possible light.”

Mandee Heller Adler, founder of International College Counselors, also recommends that students weed out potentially controversial posts, including any opinions or content related to politics. 

“I’m not saying that they have to get rid of the whole thing altogether, but certainly delete any political posts,” Adler told CBS MoneyWatch. “This is kind of an easy way for kids to protect themselves.”

Sasha Chada, who has led Texas-based college admissions counseling group Ivy Scholars for over a decade, said that asking students to delete their social media would be a “tall order” given how deeply ingrained the platforms are in their lives. Over half of U.S. adults between the ages of 18 and 34 report using TikTok, according to Pew Research.

Chilling effect?

Some critics think the State Department’s scrutiny of international students’ social accounts will inhibit their freedom of expression. 

“While social media vetting of visa applicants isn’t new, should the administration’s ‘expanded vetting’ consider political viewpoints, it will certainly scare some would-be applicants into silencing themselves on any topic they feel might contradict the views of President Trump, or his successors,” said Robert Shibley, special counsel at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which promotes free speech on college campuses.

The State Department did not respond to CBS MoneyWatch’s request for comment. “We take very seriously the process of vetting who it is that comes into the country, and we’re going to continue to do that,” State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters this week, when asked about student visas. 

Mahsa Khanbabai, an immigration attorney based in Massachusetts whose firm assists with student visas, said she has spoken to dozens of foreign students — both overseas and in the U.S. — some of whom have decided to delete their social media accounts or change them from public to private for protection. 

Students, she said, are not just concerned about posts on political flashpoints like Gaza, but also their personal views on topics like climate change and reproductive rights advocacy. Recent consultations Khanbabai has had with foreign students have been focused, she said, on helping them determine how strongly they feel about publicizing their views, and giving them a sense of the potential trade-offs when deciding to post or not to post. 

“I meet with students to ask them, ‘Are you willing to pause engagement on social media to achieve longer-term goals like your career and education, knowing that in the short term you’re ultimately kind of maybe sacrificing some of your ethical or moral values?'” she said.

Source link