Elon Musk took a shot at President Donald Trump as the two appear to be feuding over social media, claiming that files relating to Jeffrey Epstein’s client list “have not been made public” because the president is in them.
“Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,” Musk wrote in a post on X. “That is the real reason they have not been made public.”
“Have a nice day, DJT!” Musk added.
Breitbart News previously reported in March that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is reportedly working to redact the Epstein files before releasing them.
Musk’s post comes as Trump expressed that he was “very surprised” and “disappointed” with Musk criticizing the “One, Big Beautiful Bill.”
“I’ve always liked Elon,” Trump said on Thursday during a meeting at the White House, the Hillreported. “And, so I was very surprised. You saw the words he had for me, and he hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad. I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill. Because the bill is incredible”
Trump added: “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.”
Trump also claimed that Musk “knew every aspect” of the bill, adding that Musk “knew it better than almost anybody.”
“He never had a problem until right after he left,” Trump added. “And, if you saw the statements he made about me, which I’m sure you can get very easily, it’s very fresh on tape. He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn’t said bad about me personally, but I’m sure that’ll be next.”
In response to Trump claiming that Musk was “upset” because the “Big, Beautiful Bill” eliminates electric vehicle tax credits, Musk said “EV/solar incentive cuts” could remain in the bill, but called for the “MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK” in the bill to be removed.
“Whatever,” Musk wrote in another post on X. “Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.”
“In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful,” Musk added. “Everyone knows this!”
In a post on Truth Social, Trump attacked Musk, claiming that he was “wearing thin” and that Trump “asked him to leave” and “took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted.”
The Trump administration issued sanctions on four individuals serving as judges of the International Criminal Court, citing the court’s “politicization and abuse of power,” after one ruling authorizing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and another targeting the actions of U.S. personnel in Afghanistan.
Last year, Judges Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou and Beti Hohler, from the court’s pretrial and trial division, ruled to authorize the issuance of arrest warrants targeting Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant, the State Department said.
Judges Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda and Luz Del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, from the ICC’s appeals division were part of a team that paved the way for the opening of an ICC investigation into alleged crimes committed by U.S. personnel in Afghanistan.
“As ICC judges, these four individuals have actively engaged in the ICC’s illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America or our close ally, Israel,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. “The ICC is politicized and falsely claims unfettered discretion to investigate, charge, and prosecute nationals of the United States and our allies.”
Neither the U.S. nor Israel is party to the Rome Statute that established the ICC.
The ICC said in a statement that the measures were “a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution.”
“Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict,” the tribunal said.
In November 2024, ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, as well as three senior Hamas leaders. The move drew protests from the Biden administration, with the former president calling it “outrageous.”
Khan stepped away from his role last month amid a UN-led sexual misconduct probe.
During President Trump’s first term in office, the U.S. government imposed sanctions — later lifted by the Biden administration — on ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and senior official Phakiso Mochochoko for their investigation of alleged war crimes by the U.S. military in Afghanistan. Then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued visa restrictions on other ICC officials and their family members.
The move is likely to be welcomed by Russian President Vladimir Putin — in March 2023, the court also issued an arrest warrant for him.
Tesla shares plunged on Thursday as an increasingly bitter spat between CEO Elon Musk and President Trump erupted in public, with Mr. Trump suggesting the federal government could strip Musk’s companies of their federal contracts.
Tesla’s stock tumbled by as much as 18% in intraday trading — the electric car maker’s sharpest selloff in almost five years — before regaining some ground to close down 14.3%, or $47.35. The drop wiped out about $151 billion in Tesla’s market value.
The shares resumed their decline in after-hours trading.
The plunge comes as Mr. Trump and Musk, the world’s richest person, traded barbs on social media on Thursday. Musk has ratcheted up his criticism of Mr. Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” tax and spending bill this week, calling it “a disgusting abomination” on Tuesday as Congress pushes to send the legislation to the president by July 4.
Musk has denounced the bill for its price tag, with the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office forecasting yesterday that the legislation would increase annual budget deficits by a total of $2.4 trillion over the next decade.
Mr. Trump criticized Musk on Truth Social, his social media app, on Thursday, suggesting that one way the government could cut spending is to withdraw government contract from Musk’s companies.
“The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” Mr. Trump wrote on Thursday afternoon.
Some of Musk’s companies are reliant on federal contracts, including space exploration company SpaceX, which has received almost $20 billion in federal contracts since 2008, according to USA Today.
The public dispute between the two “is sending shivers down the backs of Tesla investors,” Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives told CBS MoneyWatch.
“This has gone from a candlelight dinner bromance to a knife fight,” Ives added. “Neither Musk nor Trump are one to back off.”
Musk, meanwhile, also posted criticisms of Mr. Trump and Republican lawmakers on Thursday, pinning a post to his X timeline that asked, “Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?”
Aimee Picchi is the associate managing editor for CBS MoneyWatch, where she covers business and personal finance. She previously worked at Bloomberg News and has written for national news outlets including USA Today and Consumer Reports.
President Donald Trump holds a roundtable discussion with the Fraternal Order of Police on Thursday, June 5.
The meeting comes after the president held an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz earlier Thursday.
Trump also found himself embroiled in a feud with former adviser Elon Musk on Thursday, as the Tesla and SpaceX owner pushes to kill Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill.
Eager customers in the U.S. and around the world lined up outside electronics stores hours in advance on Thursday to collect their pre-ordered Nintendo Switch 2 video game consoles.
The much anticipated Switch 2, being released at midnight worldwide Thursday, is an upgrade to its eight-year-old predecessor with new social features meant to draw players into online gaming. Nintendo is counting on the Switch 2 to boost sagging sales.
In the U.S., a chaotic pre-order process in April left some fans frustrated after the consoles quickly sold out. Still, some eager fans lined up early Thursday at retailers such as Target in hopes of purchasing a unit.
“I’m just rolling the dice here,” said Edgar Huo, who was in a line of about 25 outside of a Target in the Tribeca neighborhood of Manhattan, New York. Many of those waiting for the store to open had ordered online, but a few like Huo hoped for a chance at purchasing any extra inventory the store had.
Doug Bowser, president of Nintendo of America, center, stands among fans outside of the Nintendo store in New York, US, early on Thursday, June 5, 2025.
Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images
In Japan, the new consoles were sold through a competitive lottery system that Nintendo said got about 2.2 million applications.
Outside the official draw, some retailers offered their own lotteries to pre-order the devices.
Nintendo Switch 2 features
The original Switch, released in 2017, is “one of the most popular game consoles of all time,” Scott Stein, editor-at-large at CNET, told CBS News Boston in January.
The new console comes with a larger and higher resolution screen than its predecessor, with improved processing power, offering smoother and more vivid graphics. Central to its updated system is a new “C” button on its controller, which will launch a “GameChat” feature that requires a subscription to Nintendo’s Switch online service. It allows players to “communicate with friends and family while playing a game,” and lets them share their game screen with others. A built-in microphone will also allow chatting with other gamers.
Nintendo has said it expects to sell 15 million Switch 2 consoles for the fiscal year through March 2026.
A mock-up of the Nintendo Co. Switch 2 game console on display at a Bic Camera Inc. electronics store in Tokyo, Japan, on Thursday, June 5, 2025. Nintendo Co. fans from Tokyo to Manhattan stood in line for hours to be among the first to get a Switch 2.
Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The company has promised to roll out attractive software for the Switch 2 later this year, including “The Legend of Zelda” games, a Pokemon title and a Kirby game, as well as offerings from outside software companies.
Nintendo is capitalizing on the launch with the opening of a store in San Francisco and the Super Nintendo World amusement facility in Orlando, Florida, both set for this month.
The Switch 2’s rollout arrives at an uncertain time for much of the gaming industry due to new tariffs implemented by U.S. President Donald Trump.
In the U.S., the Switch 2’s baseline launch price is $449.99 — significantly higher than the original Switch’s $299 price tag.
A “Mario Kart World” game for the new console is priced at $80, marking the first time a Nintendo game has broached $80.
Ariana Drehsler/Bloomberg via Getty Images
A “Mario Kart World” game for the new console is priced at $80, marking the first time a Nintendo game has broached $80, Washington Post video game reporter Gene Park told CBS News in April.
“It’s a little eyebrow-raising. It’s really the first Nintendo game to broach $80, and there’s a lot of talk about video games becoming $100 right now,” Park said.
U.S. preorders for the Switch 2 were delayed for several weeks so the company could assess the potential impact of tariffs.
This week, as President Trump and some of his prominent allies have promoted his sweeping budget bill, they have repeated a number of claims about the package that contradict expert analysis.
The so-called “one big, beautiful bill” narrowly passed the House last month and now faces major challenges in the Senate, including from holdouts like GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who opposes the bill in its current form. Elon Musk, the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, has also publicly slammed the bill’s price tag and tried to convince lawmakers to kill it.
In the face of this, the White House and House Speaker Mike Johnson have revived a number of their earlier talking points, claiming that their bill will reduce the nation’s debt and bring substantial tax relief to American workers while not cutting Medicaid benefits to those who qualify.
Here’s a breakdown of the claims:
The bill will reduce the deficit by $1.6 trillion
Johnson said June 2:“I am telling you, this is going to reduce the deficit.” Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said May 22: “The One Big Beautiful Bill also helps get our fiscal house in order by carrying out the largest deficit reduction in nearly 30 years with $1.6 trillion in mandatory savings.”
Details: Republicans have claimed the bill would reduce the deficit, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggesting it could save Americans nearly $1.6 trillion.
That’s false, according to multiple non-partisan analysts and think tanks. While the bill includes cost-saving policies like new Medicaid work requirements and cuts to federal food assistance programs, analysts have found those savings are outweighed by expensive provisions — like extending 2017 tax cuts, eliminating taxes on tips and boosting border security funding.
The Congressional Budget Office, Congress’ official non-partisan budget scorers, estimated the bill’s $1.2 trillion in spending cuts would be far exceeded by nearly $3.7 trillion in lost revenue, increasing the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Independent analysts at Penn Wharton and the Tax Foundation estimated that even after accounting for economic growth the bill could create, it would still raise the deficit by $3.2 trillion or $1.7 trillion, respectively.
Asked to explain the discrepancy, a White House official said the CBO “isn’t the most reliable source.” Johnson’s office has not responded.
Taxes will rise by 68% if the bill does not pass
Mr. Trump said May 31: “If Senator Rand Paul votes against our Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, he is voting for, along with the Radical Left Democrats, a 68% Tax Increase.”
Details: Mr.Trump has repeatedlyclaimed that senators will be raising people’s taxes by 68% if they do not vote in favor of the reconciliation bill. However, multiple independent analyses show that claim is false.
The bill aims to extend tax cuts passed in 2017 that are set to expire. If those cuts lapse, the average household’s after-tax income would fall by an estimated 2.1%, reflecting a roughly 7.5% tax increase, according to the non-partisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
Similarly, the Tax Foundation, an independent think tank, estimated that if the tax cuts aren’t extended and other provisions in the bill, such as exempting tips from taxes, don’t pass, middle-income households would forgo a 4.5% increase in their after-tax income.
The White House did not respond to a request for clarification on the president’s claim.
Alex Muresianu, a senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, said the president may have been referring to the share of taxpayers — about 62% — who would face a tax increase if the bill isn’t passed. Other Republicans framed the statistic this way, including Kentucky Rep. Andy Barr who said opponents of the bill are voting for a “tax increase on 68% of Americans.”
The only Medicaid cuts in the bill target waste, fraud and abuse
Mr. Trump said June 2: “There will be NO CUTS to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. … The only ‘cutting’ we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn’t.” Johnson said June 2: “We’re not cutting Medicaid. What we’re doing is strengthening the program. We’re reducing fraud, waste and abuse that is rampant in Medicaid to ensure that that program is essential for so many people.”
Details: Mr. Trump previously promised that his administration was not going to introduce cuts to Medicaid benefits and now claims the House-passed budget bill only targets “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the program. Johnson has echoed the claim.
However, that’s not true, according to non-partisan analyses.
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill would cut over $600 billion from Medicaid in the next decade. Only a fraction of that would come from anti-fraud measures such as increased efforts to verify enrollees aren’t enrolled in multiple states, according to Alice Burns, the associate director at the non-partisan KFF’s Program on Medicaid and the Uninsured.
Roughly half of the savings would come from imposing new work requirements on recipients without young children or disabilities. Supporters say this encourages able-bodied enrollees to contribute to their communities. However, most Medicaid enrollees under 65 already have jobs, according to KFF. The change doesn’t address waste, fraud or abuse in health care as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service.
The bill would also require states to charge copayments of up to $35 for some medical services for people with incomes above the poverty level — a cost-saving move with little bearing on program integrity. In current law, states are allowed to charge out of pocket costs to low-income enrollees but they are typically minimal.
President Donald Trump on Thursday said he was “very surprised” and “disappointed” by Elon Musk’s sharp criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill.
“I’ve always liked Elon. And so I was very surprised. You saw the words he had for me, and he hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad. I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill. Because the bill is incredible,” Trump said during a White House meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.
“Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will any more,” he added.
The 47th president said that the Tesla CEO’s problem with the Big Beautiful Bill revolves mostly around the legislation’s elimination of electric vehicle tax credits, and noted that Musk was aware of the policy “from the beginning.”
“He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody. And he never had a problem until right after he left. I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” Trump remarked.
Musk wrote that the bill can scrap the electric vehicle credits as long as they get rid of the purported “DISGUSTING PORK” in the bill:
Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.
Musk then accused Trump of lying, saying that the bill was not shown to him during his time as a government adviser.
He wrote, “False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!”
Musk’s company, Tesla, reportedly spent $240,000 lobbying on behalf of the credits and other matters.
Sean Moran is a policy reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on X @SeanMoran3.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Thursday he’s “disappointed” with Elon Musk after his former backer and advisor lambasted the president’s signature bill.
Trump suggested the world’s richest man misses being in the White House and has “Trump derangement syndrome.”
The Republican president reflected on his breakup with Musk in front of reporters in the Oval Office as Musk continued a storm of social media posts attacking Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” and warning it will increase the federal deficit.
“I’m very disappointed in Elon,” Trump said. “I’ve helped Elon a lot.”
Washington — President Trump signed a proclamation this week barring travelers and immigrants from 12 countries and restricting entry for nationals from another seven, citing U.S. national security interests.
The countries affected by the new restrictions, which take effect on June 9, are shown on this map and listed below.
The 12 countries where travel is fully restricted
The proclamation, with some exemptions, bans the entry of foreigners seeking to come to the U.S. permanently as legal immigrants, as well as those with temporary visas — including tourists — from these 12 countries:
Afghanistan
Myanmar
Chad
The Republic of the Congo
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Haiti
Iran
Libya
Somalia
Sudan
Yemen
The 7 countries where travel is partially restricted
The president’s decree also partially suspends the entry of travelers and immigrants, including legal immigrants seeking to move to the U.S. and certain temporary visa holders who hail from these seven countries:
Burundi
Cuba
Laos
Sierra Leone
Togo
Turkmenistan
Venezuela
What are the exemptions?
The president’s decree contains the following exemptions:
U.S. permanent residents and the spouses and children of U.S. citizens who have “clear and convincing evidence of identity and family relationship”
Afghans who assisted American forces and have special visas
Diplomats
Athletes coming to the U.S. for the World Cup, the Olympics and other major sporting events
Dual nationals with a passport from a country not listed in the president’s decree
Adoptions
Ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran with immigrant visas
Exceptions made by the attorney general or secretary of state for travel deemed as advancing “United States national interest.”
Johannesburg — On most mornings, dozens of people line up and wait for appointments outside the U.S. Consulate in Johannesburg, South Africa, many seeking applications for visas to travel to the U.S. It can take up to five or six months just to get one of the appointments.
On Thursday, a chilly winter morning in South Africa, CBS News found hopeful travelers in the line worried about what could happen if they do make it to an arrival gate at a U.S. airport, or during their visits.
President Trump’s announcement on Wednesday of a looming travel ban on all citizens from 12 nations in Africa and the Middle East didn’t even include South Africa, despite the American leader’s tetchy relations with the country. But the anxiety caused by the return of blanket travel restrictions — something Mr. Trump did during his first term, too — was almost palpable in Johannesburg.
One person in the line said they were planning to travel for a work conference, but they wondered whether it was a good idea.
Another, tentatively planning to travel for non-essential reasons, worried that, with the last name Assad, it might be better to skip the planned trip entirely.
“Do I run the risk of being rounded up and sent to another country, or even jail?” they asked. “The risk is simply too high.”
No one in the line would give CBS News their full name — out of fear, most said, of any public comment possibly bringing a denial of their visa request.
What African countries are facing Trump’s travel ban, and why?
Nationals of seven African countries are facing a ban on travel to the U.S. from June 9, per Mr. Trump’s announcement: Chad, Somalia, Sudan, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea and Libya.
Three of those countries — Sudan, Somalia and Libya — were among the countries put under a travel ban during Mr. Trump’s first term in January 2017, though the restrictions on Sudan were later dropped, and those against Somalia and Libya were eased.
Many of the 12 countries on the new list have been wracked by repressive regimes and plagued by conflict.
“We don’t want them,” President Trump said as he announced the ban on Wednesday, which he said was needed “to protect Americans from dangerous actors.”
He cited risks ranging from terrorism to people overstaying their visas, and stressed that the U.S. “cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter.”
Somalia was cited by the president as being a “terrorist safe haven,” while Libya, he said, had a “historical terrorist presence.”
“The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,” Mr. Trump said.
Critics noted that the man charged in that attack, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is an Egyptian national, and Egypt is not included on the travel ban list announced by Mr. Trump on Wednesday.
Somalia immediately responded to the American leader’s proclamation, with the country’s Ambassador to the U.S., Dahir Hassan Abdi, saying in a statement that, “Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised.”
Mr. Trump said in his remarks that “the United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process.”
The Africa Union issued a statement Thursday asking the U.S. to adopt a more “consultative approach” with the countries named by Mr. Trump, adding that it was concerned about the “potential negative impact on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades.”
It has long been difficult and laborious for people from many African nations to get a visa to travel to the U.S.
Mr. Trump’s announcement came, however, just days after a second group of South African Afrikaner “refugees” left on commercial flights bound for the U.S. under a program announced by the White House in February, which fast-tracks resettlement of the white South Africans even as the administration works to suspend other refugee programs.
In January, South Africa adopted a land expropriation bill that allows the state to take ownership of land to address racial disparities in ownership. To date, no land has been expropriated without compensation in South Africa, despite claims by right-wing activists in the country — and some prominent supporters outside South Africa, including Elon Musk — to the contrary.
Soon after the bill was passed, in a briefing with journalists, Mr. Trump accused the government of South Africa of “doing some terrible, horrible things,” and he said in a social media post that he would be, “cutting off all future funding to South Africa until a full investigation of this situation has been completed!”
As relations between the two countries deteriorated, President Cyril Ramaphosa traveled to Washington late last month with a raft of new measures to try to mend ties. But President Trump ambushed him in the Oval Office, with news cameras rolling, with a video he claimed as proof of the so-called white genocide.
President of South Africa Cyril Ramaphosa speaks with President Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House, May 21, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty
The video included clips of controversial South African opposition figure Julius Malema singing a song that became popular during the anti-apartheid struggle, called “Kill the Boer,” which means Afrikaner.
Ramaphosa watched the video and then pointed out to Mr. Trump that the views voiced in it were not government policy, before conceding that South Africa undeniably has a violent crime problem — but that only a small number of white farmers had been targeted.
Ramaphosa’s two hour meeting with President Trump was largely seen as productive from the South African point of view. Ramaphosa had hoped to leave the White House with an assurance from Mr. Trump that he would attend the G20 summit in South Africa in November. He didn’t get that, but the U.S. leader said he was considering it.
The U.S. Embassy in South Africa later issued a statement updating administration’s policy, saying that to qualify for U.S. resettlement, applicants “must be of Afrikaner ethnicity or a member of a racial minority in South Africa and must be able to articulate a past experience of persecution or fear of persecution.”
Across Africa, there was already a sense of confusion and sadness over the relentless aid and trade cuts brought by the Trump administration, and the travel bans have only exacerbated that feeling.
“Maybe Americans just don’t like us anymore,” suggested one woman in the line outside the U.S. Consulate on Thursday.
Sarah Carter is an award-winning CBS News producer based in Johannesburg, South Africa. She has been with CBS News since 1997, following freelance work for organizations including The New York Times, National Geographic, PBS Frontline and NPR.