Tag Archives: America (United States)

Building a Living Archive at the Guggenheim: An Interview with Rashid Johnson

Rashid Johnson recently opened an expansive career survey in New York. Photo: David Heald © Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York

Being honored with a solo exhibition at the Guggenheim is arguably one of the most significant milestones an American artist can achieve. Despite the curatorial challenges posed by its distinctive architecture, the museum’s spiraling structure offers a uniquely fluid exhibition pathway, allowing an artist’s entire oeuvre and conceptual inquiry to unfold organically across levels. In “A Poem for Deep Thinkers,” Rashid Johnson takes over the Guggenheim’s iconic rotunda with a sweeping survey spanning three decades of practice—a testament to the richly layered complexity of his work, dense with both political and philosophical meaning. Featuring nearly ninety pieces—from his iconic Anxious Men, altar shelves and soap paintings to more radical performance-based photography and video—this exhibition maps Johnson’s sustained engagement with materials and objects as a system of thought, building from them a personal symbolic code and language of sorts to embark on a deep reflection, confronting collective questions of human vulnerability at a moment that is both overwhelmingly complex and acutely fragile.

“My practice is fairly layered, as I use art as a space for contemplation and to investigate freedom and will,” Johnson told Observer a week before the exhibition’s opening. “I think of it as a kind of spiritual place—one that allows me to illustrate and reflect on the world while also giving me a sense of agency.”

An installation view of “Rashid Johnson: A Poem for Deep Thinkers.” Photo: David Heald © Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York

What emerges from this exhibition is a more multilayered understanding of Johnson’s oeuvre—one that reaches far beyond identity politics and racial inequality, even as his practice remains deeply anchored in the literary and intellectual traditions of the African American community. The portrait that takes shape is not only that of an artist but of a philosopher grappling with broader political and spiritual questions about the human condition. “My practice has, over time, inherited a different kind of existential quality,” Johnson said. “There’s an investigation of the interior world—an investment in and engagement with interiority and deep thinking.”

Johnson views his art as a marker of time, and the show reflects that, serving as both a witness to his practice and a chronicle of his life. “When you think about things that are allowed to mark time and that can capture and even illustrate moments from your life, you approach the idea of totality, which includes contemplations on death,” he reflected. “Art is a way to capture the wholeness of our existence.”

SEE ALSO: Satellite Collective’s Kevin Draper and Lora Robertson On Making Art in Turbulent Times

Indeed, death is a recurring theme throughout the exhibition, surfacing in works that confront both the physical and psychological fragility of human existence, while often urging us to embrace it as part of a necessary cycle of transformation and renewal. Death is a Good Start is the title of the show’s opening chapter, encountered as visitors begin their ascent. Endings, Johnson suggests, are prerequisites for new beginnings—opportunities for meditation on both personal and historical transformation.

The show is Johnson’s first solo presentation at the Guggenheim, his largest exhibition to date and the first expansive museum survey of his work in over a decade. Photo: David Heald © Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York

In this sense, death is not an end but the beginning of a new journey—into an afterlife or otherworldly dimensions already evoked in his Soul Painting Six Souls and the fire pit High Life. As recognition often arrives only after passing, death can also mark the birth of a legend, as in Self-Portrait laying on Jack Johnson’s Grave, which opens the exhibition. It can even become a destination—a form of respite or escape—as suggested by Death is Golden. Each of these works contemplates the enigmatic migration from the physical to the metaphysical, embracing death as a portal of transformation.

Collapsing distinctions between media and technique, Johnson’s practice embraces a kind of alchemical fluidity, where materials and ideas are constantly evolving. “The subject of my work is freedom,” he emphasized, expressing a deep desire to transcend constraints in art, culture and even time.

At the Guggenheim, Johnson offers an epic journey rooted in his own experience as a human cast into the world who, through creativity, asserts the agency to make sense of it beyond any given or preordained narrative. Yet this journey is not his alone; it invites a broader identification, forging emotional and subconscious connections with others.

As in a poem, objects in Johnson’s work endlessly transfigure, becoming symbols and signifiers laden with meaning yet capable of expansion, redirection or recalibration through dialectical juxtapositions. His practice reflects a deep investment in the behavior of materials and how they can be transformed, both physically and semantically, through the artist’s agency. Ongoing experimentation opens space to imagine ever-new ways of being and making meaning in the world. Across his work, there is a persistent drive—an invitation, even—to leave a mark, traced through objects and creative acts, as a way to resist nihilistic conclusions.

The exhibition offers a loose chronology of Johnson’s artistic evolution across nearly three decades. Photo: David Heald © Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York

Nevertheless, this fundamental uncertainty and the contemplation of life’s inherent transience give rise to an irrepressible sense of anxiety—one that seems to define the condition of contemporary man in an era where idols and established religions have faded, leaving individuals in a perpetual search for meaning. “I think this sense of anxiety is part of me, to some degree. I was an anxious person for much of my life,” Johnson said. “We’re growing up in a time in our world, and in America in particular, of extreme uncertainty.” Yet Johnson believes in the possibility of radical creative resistance and of reclaiming agency through meditation and self-reflection as a way to confront the chaotic nature of the cosmos. “There’s a particular kind of opportunity we’ve developed amongst each other, where we can express certain vulnerabilities. I think we’re living in the age of anxiety, which is both the result of uncertainty and the space in which we can begin to understand ourselves as vulnerable and be honest about that vulnerability as humans.”

Perhaps as a way to confront existential uncertainty, Johnson’s practice is driven by an almost obsessive desire to arrest the flow of time by constructing symbolic anchors. Acting as a contemporary archaeologist, he gathers cultural and symbolic remnants, arranging them on shelves that both protect and elevate, treating them as historical documents and spiritual instruments alike. These assemblages, which often resemble altars, merge vernacular objects with spiritual and cultural artifacts, becoming sites for personal ritual or attempts to trace an inheritance or legacy that might guide the search for meaning. Johnson describes these works as ‘personal archives’: accumulations of tools that have helped him make sense of the world, engaging both body and mind in crafting poetic responses to lived experience.

Throughout Johnson’s oeuvre, a recurring constellation of materials reappears: black soap, shea butter, glass, ceramic, books, plants and vinyl albums. These elements form a personal toolkit, a symbolic lexicon of signs and references that Johnson offers up for open-ended interpretation.

The show features photography, video and installations, as well as his recent ventures into materially hybrid paintings and assemblages. Photo: David Heald © Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York

Driven by archival impulse, these works reflect a compulsion to gather and house what Johnson calls “soulful” objects. They function simultaneously as witnesses and vessels, anchoring the artist’s search for meaning through their dual roles as signifiers and ideas. Whether arranged on shelves, melted, painted, marked or reshaped, they are activated into discourse through both placement and transformation. “I think a lot about the things that are domestic and close to me, and the type of employability with objects and materials,” he explained. “I think of them as collaborators; they have symbolic autonomy on their own, but they can also be ‘employed,’ participating in the process of building a narrative.”

The fullest realization of this material language comes in Sanguine (2025), a major installation occupying the museum’s uppermost level. This monumental metal armature serves as both a house of creativity and a dynamic container for ideas, materials and even life itself. Here, familiar objects—books, ceramics, plants and more—coalesce into an index of Johnson’s practice, exploring the limitless potential of meaning through layering, juxtaposition and recombination.

This personal constellation of meaning extends beyond the structure of the shelves, expanding into an immersive installation of plants, books and symbolic presences suspended from the top of the rotunda. In transforming the Guggenheim’s iconic spiral into a lush, hanging garden, Johnson creates a space that suggests a continuum between the atomic, physical fabric of reality and the realm of the collective unconscious.

Ultimately, Johnson embraces plurality, acknowledging a reality in perpetual flux, where meaning resides not in definitive answers but in a spectrum of possible interpretations and hypotheses. “I think I’m following the path that allows me to make honest progress—to be simple, vulnerable and playful, while I continue to experiment,” he reflected. Despite the many turns Johnson’s work has taken over time—and across subjects, ideological concerns, media and themes—what emerges from this survey is the remarkable consistency of his vision over three decades, which the artist himself acknowledges. “The coherence might not be in terms of materials or aesthetics, but emotionally and intellectually, the work has maintained its ambition and its curiosity, and a genuine enthusiasm for exploration and experimentation.” For him, art is a way to understand the world, even if it cannot heal its pain or resolve its challenges. “I’m not saying it’s a way to cure the world, a solution for problems, but it’s a tool to open and confront fundamental questions.”

The artist has transformed the Guggenheim’s iconic spiral into a lush garden that suggests the limitless potential of meaning. Photo: David Heald © Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York

Rashid Johnson: A Poem for Deep Thinkers” is on view at the Guggenheim in New York through January 18, 2025. 



Source link

Where to Find the Best Negronis in L.A.

The Negroni is a classic Italian cocktail known for its vibrant, spirit-forward nature. This timeless tipple was reportedly created in 1919 at Florence’s Caffè Casoni, and is typically served as an apéritif before a comforting Italian meal. Though the traditional recipe for a classic Negroni calls for only three ingredients (equal parts gin, sweet vermouth and Campari, garnished with an orange slice or orange peel), several Los Angeles bars and restaurants have put their own spin on the Negroni. Mezcal, in particular, is a popular substitute for gin, while the Negroni Sbagliato, which had its viral moment thanks to House of the Dragon star Emma D’Arcy, boasts a bubbly Prosecco profile.

Places like Capri Club in Eagle Rock serve a few different renditions of the Negroni, including a frozen version. Though a standard gin Negroni is the most popular, mezcal Negronis are a close second. Renowned DTLA bar Death and Co. and Koreatown’s The Normandie Club both use rum in theirs, proving that the Negroni is just as versatile as it is classic. Whether you want to get a balanced buzz at one of West Hollywood’s hottest new Italian eateries or sip on a rooftop in Beverly Hills, we’ve got you covered on where to get the best Negronis in Los Angeles.



Source link

U-Haul Gallery’s Mobile Model Takes Art to the Streets

By turning rental trucks into exhibition spaces, U-Haul Gallery challenges the conventions of brick-and-mortar galleries. Jack Chase of Uhaul Gallery

During the jam-packed New York art week, you may have spotted a nondescript U-Haul truck parked outside any one of the city’s main fairs or high-profile gallery openings. It stands to reason—U-Haul, with its relatively affordable van and truck rentals, has a role to play in the art market. If, however, you think that role is necessarily logistics, prepare to be surprised. In a week dense with art and spectacle, we ducked out of an overcrowded Michael Armitage opening at David Zwirner to see what exactly was drawing an audience to one such truck—its cargo bay wide open and people drifting in and out, sometimes with beers in hand.

What we found was U-Haul Gallery, a nomadic initiative experimenting with an alternative mobile model for showing and circulating art while sidestepping the punishing overhead of brick-and-mortar space in the city. “The gallery was born out of frustration with the cost of space in New York City,” director and founder James Sundquist told Observer.

The busy week of art fairs marked the one-year anniversary of this slyly resourceful gallery, which has been able to deliver programming to virtually any hot pocket of real estate for the modest price of a truck rental—$29.99 per day. “The very first show took place in SoHo, to reclaim a space historically home to many artists who have since been priced out,” Sundquist said. “With this truck, we create a temporary architecture to enact the gallery.”

U-Haul Gallery presenting its show in Chelsea during a busy week of art fairs. Jack Chase of Uhaul Gallery

The inaugural show was conceived as a one-off: more performance art than actual gallery. However, the audience response was unexpectedly enthusiastic, according to Sundquist, which gave them the confidence to keep going. “I think people enjoy the freedom of it—the punk quality, the sense that the bounds of the art world can be disrupted in a guerrilla fashion,” he said, adding that artists have embraced the gallery’s approachability and agility, often becoming co-conspirators in shaping the exhibition as it unfolds. “There is always a plan, but the plan always changes. We can adapt to the situation on the ground in ways a stationary gallery cannot.”

Since its founding, U-Haul Gallery has staged several shows, mostly timed with New York’s better weather. Last October, Sundquist teamed up with Jack Chase and Victoria Gill for “The Show of Stolen Goods,” marking the first time outside curators took the wheel. “Jack and I developed an incredible synergy during that show, and I felt together we could keep pushing the gallery into new terrain,” he said. Following that collaboration, Chase officially joined the gallery as head of global strategy. “We’ve since been partners in crime.”

When it comes to programming, Sundquist reflected that the gallery is writing its story as it goes. “We attract artists who are interested in exploring outside the traditional gallery space—physically, but also mentally and spiritually. The artists want to work in the alternative conditions of the U-Haul, and we develop a collaborative approach to each show.”

SEE ALSO: Satellite Collective’s Kevin Draper and Lora Robertson On Making Art in Turbulent Times

The show they presented last week was a sharp testament not only to their collaborative model but also to their knack for problem-solving and real-time adaptability. Playing across multiple screens mounted in the back of the truck was Ben Nuñez’s conceptual video work Today, Last Year, featuring four days from his Panopticon endurance project, in which he recorded his waking life for an entire year using an AXON police body camera. In these videos, Nuñez captures the flat banality of daily life with an unflinching intimacy—disturbing, solipsistic and shot through a device more commonly associated with social violence than self-reflection. Echoing Foucauldian thought on the embodiment of power structures and the internalization of surveillance, the project interrogates the entangled relationship between digital media, social codes and identity construction, dissolving the boundary between self and screen until the online double feels more real than lived experience.

“It was a conceptual video show that presented new technical challenges,” Sundquist said, citing the screens’ power requirements and the logistical quirks of outfitting a U-Haul to present screen-based works. “We arrived at a presentation that really resonated with the audience. We want to do shows that will challenge us.”

Ben Nuñez’s showing of 𝘛𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘓𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘠𝘦𝘢𝘳 marks the artist’s first exhibition with the gallery. Jack Chase of Uhaul Gallery

Sundquist envisions the gallery as a vessel for working with cultural space as a medium. “I am interested in expanding the terrain of the Gallery,” he said, noting that while the art world is very small, the world itself is vast. “I think there’s a lot of room to grow, and it just requires curiosity. We are not bound to a brick-and-mortar space, so we can present the show in multiple locations on the same day. It is imperative that we stay on the move.”

The low-overhead model allows U-Haul Gallery to take bigger risks with the work it presents, while also offering artists a larger cut of sales than the traditional gallery structure would ever permit. And when it comes to collectors, Sundquist says the tide is turning. “It has taken persistence. We are uncouth but very serious. We are a real business and sell work at accessible price points.” The programming may be mobile, in other words, but the intent is anything but casual.

Accessibility is central to U-Haul Gallery’s ethos. That applies to prices, which range from $3 for a sticker to thousands for unique artworks, as much as to the audience. “Everyone can buy in and participate,” Sundquist says. “We want to be approachable and welcoming to everyone, not just the art-world audience. We love doing shows at street-level because it invites anyone and everyone.” Notably, U-Haul Gallery doesn’t only set up outside art fairs to catch the in-crowd but also parks outside Madison Square Garden during Knicks games, bridging cultures rather than catering solely to collectors. “The art world is an island, and we are building a bridge.”

Accessibility remains central to U-Haul Gallery’s ethos. Jack Chase of Uhaul Gallery

Moving forward, U-Haul Gallery will continue its unofficial shadow circuit alongside the city’s art fairs. “We will continue to get kicked out of Frieze,” Sundquist quips. “We have already presented in Los Angeles with ‘Drive-In,’ a group show from February, and have plans to present in London, Paris and Miami this year.” Several solo shows are also in the works for New York, while the gallery remains committed to featuring artists local to each city.

Meanwhile, the gallery is gearing up for its own fair: applications are now open for the U-Haul Art Fair, scheduled to coincide with this year’s Armory Show in early September. Billed as a low-cost alternative to the city’s other fairs, the event will feature ten booths—each housed in its own truck—all parked on the same street in what promises to feel like an unpermitted block party. “As always, we will capitalize on the art world buzz and use our disruptive model to draw attention to the fair.”

Applications for the inaugural edition of the U-Haul Art Fair can be found here and are due by July 1.



Source link

At Sotheby’s, a $70M Giacometti Fails to Sell While Works By Munch and Cézanne Ignite Buyer Excitement

Sotheby’s Modern Evening Auction saw a headline lot by Giacometti falter dramatically, casting a shadow over an otherwise solid $186.4 million result. Brendon Cook/BFA.com

If the prevailing art market mantra in recent months has been that, while buyers may be more selective, true quality will always sell, then what unfolded last night at Sotheby’s Modern Evening Auction delivered a sobering counterpoint. The evening’s centerpiece—Giacometti’s bronze bust of his brother Diego, the only known hand-painted version and a highlight of the 1956 Venice Biennale—was a dramatic pass. Despite being billed as the star lot, Grande tête mince (Grande tête de Diego), consigned by the Soloviev Foundation to benefit its charities, stalled after a few rounds of chandelier bidding and fell short of its $70 million estimate, dissolving into the uneasy silence of a muted salesroom. The work went to the rostrum without a guarantee or an irrevocable bid—a bold, some might say reckless, move in a market where such mechanisms are increasingly treated less like optional safeguards and more like essential life preservers. The lingering question is whether the consignors were too eager to test the waters unprotected. The estimate itself may have been ambitious enough to dissuade even the most ardent trophy hunters, though this time, the trophy was undeniably the real thing. “It simply wasn’t its moment,” said Julian Dawes, Sotheby’s head of Impressionist and modern art in the Americas. “Our belief in the work remains undiminished.” Sotheby’s CEO Charles Stewart echoed the sentiment, calling the result “an organic, genuine auction moment,” and stressing, “It wasn’t financially engineered at all. It was the seller believing in the work and willing to sell at a price.”

In recent years, Giacometti has cemented his position as a reliable cornerstone of the auction market—a blue-chip name that consistently performs and seldom disappoints, even during periods of economic turbulence. But as auction houses increasingly err on the side of caution, it’s possible the market has been oversaturated this season. Last night at Sotheby’s, the house also offered Femme debout (Poseuse I) from the collection of Hollywood film producer Joseph H. Hazen—one of the evening’s standout consignments. Opening at $3.4 million, the sculpture ignited a prolonged bidding battle, ultimately hammering down after more than five tense minutes for $5.6 million ($6.8 million with premium), landing comfortably above its $4-6 million estimate.

SEE ALSO: Despite Quiet Bidding, Christie’s Evening Sales Brought in $489M

Despite the Giacometti miss, which admittedly cast a long shadow over the evening, Sotheby’s still brought in a respectable $186.4 million across sixty lots—albeit short of its presale estimate of $240.3 million to $318.7 million. The sale felt noticeably livelier than Christie’s the night before, with deeper competition across several lots despite a few sharp disappointments. Of the works that did sell, roughly 40 percent exceeded their high estimates, and twenty-six lots were guaranteed—twenty-four of them backed by third parties.

Alberto Giacometti’s Grande tête mince (1955) failed to meet its $70 million estimate. Courtesy of Sotheby’s

Ten lots failed to sell, leaving Sotheby’s with a final sell-through rate of 83 percent. Notably, 40 percent of the offerings were fresh to the market—and those works generally outperformed the rest. That was true for one of the evening’s top lots, Alexander Calder’s Four Big Dots, held in the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art’s collection for more than 60 years and offered to support future acquisitions and collection care. It sold to a bidder in the room for $8,285,000. Similarly, Georgia O’Keeffe’s Leaves of a Plant (1942), making its auction debut, surpassed expectations by fetching $12,972,500 against an $8-12 million estimate. Acquired by the seller in 1978, the work had debuted in O’Keeffe’s 1943 retrospective at An American Place and was later exhibited widely, including in the Georgia O’Keeffe Museum’s inaugural show in 1997. Among the other top performers was Picasso’s Homme assis (1969), which brought in $15 million—one of the strongest results for the series.

Still, to achieve that sell-through rate, Sotheby’s quietly withdrew at least four lots before the sale, including Wassily Kandinsky’s Study for Improvisation 10 (1910), estimated at $6–8 million. During the auction, auctioneer Oliver Barker noted that Rufino Tamayo’s Brindis (1949) likely failed to find a buyer, despite growing interest in the artist, as its $1-1.5 million estimate appeared overly ambitious.

František Kupka’s Flux et reflux (1923) sold for $5,906,000. Sotheby’s

Sparking moments of bidder excitement were several standout lots from the Joseph H. Hazen Collection, beginning with Robert Delaunay’s Nature morte (1936), which exceeded expectations, hammering at $1.6 million ($2 million with fees) after a lively exchange between bidders in the room and on the phones. Four bidders also chased the next lot, a luminous František Kupka, Flux et reflux (1923), which surged to $4.8 million ($5.9 million with fees)—helped, no doubt, by the Guggenheim’s recent survey on Orphism that reignited interest in the artist’s work. Backed by both a guarantee and an irrevocable bid, the painting—also included in the catalogue for Kupka’s 1975 Guggenheim retrospective—came with the kind of institutional pedigree that may have given it an edge over the following lot, Kupka’s Formes flasques (1919-25), which sold below estimate at $4.3 million ($5.2 million with fees).

Tension resurfaced when Fernand Léger’s La Jeune fille au bouquet (1921), also from the Hazen Collection, failed to meet its $5-7 million estimate, stalling at $4.3 million. A few lots later, Barker reopened bidding and hammered it at $3 million—a clear signal that the seller had adjusted expectations to meet the market where it stood.

As Barker worked to regain momentum following the Giacometti flop, fireworks returned later in the evening. Edvard Munch’s portrait of Heinrich C. Hudtwalcker drew five phone bidders and hammered at $1.5 million ($1.8 million with fees), selling to a collector in Asia. Immediately after, a heated bidding war broke out over one of the earliest portraits of Cézanne’s partner and future wife, Hortense Fiquet. Portrait de Madame Cézanne (1877) opened at $3.9 million and hammered at $6 million ($7,370,000 with premium). With only two other portraits of Fiquet having come to auction in the past 25 years, the result marked the second-highest price ever achieved for the subject.

Lot 25, Paul Cézanne’s Portrait de Madame Cézanne (circa 1877) sold for $7.3 million. Sotheby’s

Sotheby’s sale also saw notably heightened participation from Asian clients. Among the highlights was Henri Matisse’s Le Bouquet d’anémones, dated 1918 and painted during the pivotal early years of the artist’s celebrated Nice period. Acquired by a Chinese collector, the work had been held in the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art’s collection for over 75 years and was offered to support the museum’s acquisitions fund. It sold swiftly for $1.2 million ($1,514,000 with premium).

Far less enthusiasm greeted a Mark Rothko from 1968, despite its strong provenance—long part of the collection of Carla Panicali, the influential Italian gallerist who oversaw Marlborough Gallery’s Rome branch in the 1960s. Opening at $2.8 million, the work hammered at $4.2 million, right within its $3.5–5 million estimate ($4,930,000 with premium).

Before the evening wrapped, Barker had the satisfaction of closing on one of the night’s most memorable moments with An Important Double-Pedestal Lamp by Frank Lloyd Wright, originally commissioned for the Susan Lawrence Dana House in Springfield, Illinois, over a century ago. Though more esoteric, appealing to a narrower collector base, the lot ignited a prolonged bidding battle and hammered after ten minutes at $6.1 million ($7,492,000 with fees). As the most important Wright work ever brought to auction, it not only doubled its low estimate but shattered the architect’s previous record of $2,903,500—selling for nearly four times the price it achieved when last offered at Sotheby’s in December 2002.

Lot 36, Frank Lloyd Wright’s An Important Double-Pedestal Lamp for the Susan Lawrence Dana House, Springfield, Illinois sold for $7.5 million. Sotheby’s

In the final stretch of the sale, both Henry Moore sculptures landed within estimate: Mother and Child on Ladderback Chair brought in $523,400, while Seated Woman on Bench sold in-room for a modest $482,600. Meanwhile, momentum appears to be building around another British sculptor, Lynn Chadwick. With Perrotin recently staging a slate of major exhibitions beginning in Paris during Art Basel, the final lot of the night—Three Elektras, one of the largest Chadwick works ever brought to auction—closed the sale on a high note, hammering at $2,002,000, well above its $1.2-1.8 million estimate.

A tense night at Phillips delivers records with women artists shining

Opening the evening earlier at 5 p.m., Phillips launched the week’s sales with a noticeably cautious tone. In a market where the once-reliable lure of youthful, fresh paint has lost momentum—at least in evening sales—the house leaned more heavily on established, blue-chip names for its Modern and Contemporary Evening Sale. Even so, the auction house managed to deliver a surprisingly confident result, bolstered by the fact that 90 percent of the lots were either fresh to market or hadn’t appeared at auction in more than 15 years. The sale achieved a total of $51,952,350 across thirty-six lots, after four were withdrawn and another four went unsold.

Grace Hartigan’s The Fourth (1956) sold for $1,633,000. Jean Bourbon

Leading the night at Phillips was Jean-Michel Basquiat’s Untitled, originally acquired by Swiss dealer Bruno Bischofberger and now offered from the personal collection of David Bowie. Opening at $3.8 million, the work landed at $5.4 million in the room ($6,594,000 with premium), exceeding its $4.5-6.5 million estimate. Another Basquiat work on paper from 1985/1986 also outperformed expectations, selling for $2,964,000.

Women artists shone throughout the evening, with Phillips strategically spotlighting new or historically overlooked names—an approach that sparked regional bidding far beyond the U.S. That was the case with Colombian artist Olga de Amaral, who made her evening sale debut with an early piece from her Images Perdidas series, inspired by pre-Columbian weaving traditions and spiritual symbolism. Opening at $220,000, the work quickly attracted multiple bidders online and in the room, doubling its estimate in under three minutes. It ultimately hammered at $920,000 to a bidder in the room, setting a new auction record for the artist at $1.2 million with fees—four times its $300,000-500,000 estimate. The result follows several years of mounting international interest in de Amaral’s work, bolstered by her representation with Lisson Gallery and further consolidated by her major exhibition at Fondation Cartier in Paris.

Olga de Amaral’s Imagen perdida (1996) soared to four times its estimate at $1.2 million. Bonnie H Morrison

Another standout was Austrian artist Kiki Kogelnik, who made her auction debut with a 1973 painting—the same year as her first exhibition in Austria. Opening at $85,000, the lot quickly climbed to $280,000 amid active international bidding online and over the phones, ultimately closing at a record $355,600 with fees.

The night also delivered a new record for Grace Hartigan, a long-overlooked and now rightly reassessed female force within Abstract Expressionism. The Forth, a large-scale, animated abstraction from 1959, hit the rostrum with authority. Described in the catalogue as “an explosive convergence of American identity, postwar ambition and painterly force,” the fourteen-foot-wide canvas opened at $400,000 and soared to $1.3 million after ten minutes of spirited bidding ($1,633,000 with premium). The work came with distinguished provenance, having once belonged to banker, philanthropist and former U.S. Ambassador to Belgium William A. M. Burden Jr., who exhibited it in Brussels the following year through the U.S. State Department’s Art in Embassies program, which placed works by leading American artists in diplomatic residences abroad. Last sold at Christie’s in 1997 for just $24,000, the painting more than doubled its $600,000 low estimate and marked an 18 percent jump over Hartigan’s previous record, set by Early November (1959), which sold for $1.38 million at Christie’s on May 12, 2022. Could this finally signal Hartigan—youngest of the Ab-Ex circle—is on course to join the market rise of Joan Mitchell and Helen Frankenthaler?

Kiki Kogelnik’s Rainy (1973) sold for $355,600. Phillips

A new record was also set last night at Phillips for another Colombian contemporary artist, Ilana Savdie, who has been making her New York debut with White Cube since the gallery announced her representation in 2023. The vibrant hues and layered textures of her Imperial diet, y otros demonios (2021), opening at $80,000—more aligned with her primary market pricing—sparked a fierce contest between online and phone bidders, culminating in a showdown between a bidder in Lebanon and another in Austin. The latter ultimately secured the work for $228,600, setting a new auction record for the rising artist.

The opening lot, a painting by Japanese artist Yu Nishimura, fell short of his recent high of $296,100 set at Sotheby’s this past February, hammering after a few muted bids at $220,000 ($279,400 with fees), despite the buzz surrounding his addition to David Zwirner’s roster. Perhaps a sign the market isn’t ready to sustain a meteoric ascent when prices stray too far, too fast from the primary range. James Turrell, by contrast, set a new record at Phillips with Ariel from his ongoing Glass Series, which hammered at $520,000 ($660,400 with fees), marking the Light and Space pioneer’s Evening Sale debut.

Some of the evening’s most anticipated lots just scraped past their low estimates. Ed Ruscha’s Alvarado to Doheny sold after a few limp bids for $4.9 million with fees—likely to its guarantor, via the house’s head of private sales. Lot 16, Gerhard Richter’s portrait of Sigmar Polke—once in the collection of Blinky PAlermo—similarly hovered at its threshold, selling for $4,174,000 after a slow rise from a $2.3 million opening bid, with Phillips’s global chairman ultimately taking it home.

But the night’s most visibly rattled moment came with Richard Prince’s Killer Nurse. As auctioneer Henry Highley approached the lot, he was handed a note that visibly threw him off balance—something had gone awry. A bidder may have backed out or retracted a commitment. After a tense few minutes of “dialing for info,” the work finally hammered at $2.6 million, shortly after Highley, with forced cheer, relayed a “great message from private sales” that appeared to salvage the situation, bringing the final price just over the low estimate at $3,206,000 with fees.

Still, the tension lingered, and Highley struggled to fully recover his rhythm. Although the Thiebaud cake found a home (selling for just short of its low estimate at $1,270,000 to Korean dealer and collector Hong Gyu Shin), most of the final lots were passes—including a seminal Frank Stella from the 1970s, a gilded mirror by Jeff Koons and a Richard Prince from his Cowboy series.

The May auction marathon continues tonight with Christie’s 21st Century Evening Sale and tomorrow with Sotheby’s The Now and Contemporary Evening Auction.



Source link

Billionaire Edward Zeng On Building a Tech-First Art Foundation to Confront What Comes Next

Each show in “ARTECHISM” explores the intersection of art, technology and the future of humanity. Artech Art Foundation

In recent years, the possibilities at the intersection of art and technology have drawn growing attention from practitioners on both sides, as digital visual expression and technologies like A.I. become increasingly pervasive, shaping not only communication but day-to-day life. As with many nascent artistic languages or emerging cultural fields throughout history, what remains conspicuously absent is a robust curatorial and academic framework capable of critically engaging with and legitimizing these new forms of expression—not to mention consistent funding and a dedicated collector or patron base to sustain their long-term development. Only recently have meaningful efforts begun to reconfigure this landscape.

The Artech Foundation, which was envisioned and founded by Edward Zeng and debuted amid the frenzy of New York’s art week, now promises to foster the growth of this fledgling ecosystem. Its mission extends beyond simply bridging art and technology, seeking instead to connect their physical and digital manifestations while cultivating communities that explore their potential to address some of today’s most urgent global challenges: sustainability, human evolution and the planet’s future. Launching with the year-long exhibition series titled “ARTECHISM – The Future of Art & Technology in Human Civilization,” Artech (which opened as a 4,000-square-foot exhibition space on Park Avenue) aims to forge new pathways at the convergence of art and technology, supporting artists, thinkers and engineers through awards, grants and commissions.

Zeng, a serial entrepreneur, venture investor and private equity fund manager, is a founding partner of NextG Tech Limited, a company focused on next-generation technologies, sustainability and digital infrastructure. A key figure in China’s digital transformation since the 1990s, he is also a managing partner of China Bridge Capital, which oversees investment funds with a combined $2.5 billion in assets. In his off hours, however, it’s art that consumes him.

Edward Zeng is the chairman and CEO of NextG Tech and the brains behind the Artech Art Foundation. Artech Art Foundation

Zeng’s passion for art emerged not from a formal education or structured collecting, but from a series of what one might call life adventures. When we spoke with the tech entrepreneur ahead of the opening of “ARTECHISM,” Zeng revealed that his first job as a student in New York was in the logistics department at Christie’s. One day, he was tasked with delivering several million-dollar paintings to a woman. “I spent over an hour trying to figure it out, hoping she’d at least give me a decent tip,” Zeng told Observer. Instead, she handed him a single dollar, saying it was all she had. “A few years later, I was at a Christie’s auction—this time, I was placing a $3.5 million bid for a major Yves Klein. I think that’s where my art journey really began.” Today, Zeng’s personal art collection includes iconic works like Damien Hirst’s Five Aspects of God and five pieces from the artist’s celebrated butterfly series, meditations on one of humanity’s most enduring questions: the existence of God.

SEE ALSO: Artificial Intelligence as Co-Creator: Rethinking Art and Authorship

With the founding of the Artech Foundation, Zeng hopes to inspire and advance the conversation around creativity and technology by addressing deeper questions of human evolution. The idea first came to him while alone in Montana, immersed in the vast stillness of nature and its overwhelming power. “Last September, I was in the middle of nowhere,” he said. “You’re alone with yourself and with this thousand-year-old mountain.” The solitude prompted a reflection on the arc of civilization and its uncertain future, leading him to identify what he calls the “three singularities”—existential crossroads humanity faces today. “Are we going to be sustainable with nature, or will it destroy us? That is the first singularity. The second concerns our relationship with technology: will we become slaves to A.I. and the metaverse, or remain the masters and creators of it?” The third, he adds, is about human coexistence: “Will we destroy each other—or find a way to live in peace?” For Zeng, these are the defining, urgent questions of our time.

He believes deeply in the power of art to confront these dilemmas. While he acknowledges that artists may not be able to cure society’s ills or provide answers, he sees in their work the potential to illuminate what’s at stake and help us imagine new paths forward. “I came to a conclusion: art is the soul of time,” he said. “So I wanted to combine art, my passion, with technology and my business to create a time and space where people can grapple with these questions.”

Miao Jing’s 3D printed sculptures stand like ancient relics from a future that never happened. Artech Art Foundation

Curated by Yanhan Peng and featuring works by Shanghai-based artist Miao Jing alongside novelist Aidos Amantai, Artech’s inaugural show, “Becoming Things, Becoming Time / Bolmahan at Delight Garden,” weaves sculpture, text, sound, video and print into a layered meditation on human consciousness and transformation. (The “ARTECHISM” manifesto, published in the catalog accompanying this first exhibition, reads: We are no longer born of nature or culture. We are built-assembled, through circuits, code and technogenesis. We claim this entanglement, and let it transform us. Artechism is not an art genre but an emergent state of being.) The show features a seamless convergence of analog and digital, body and machine, nature and simulacrum, the real and the virtual.

Drawing inspiration from ancient Chinese mythology and ancestral tales, symbolic figures from Miao Jing’s digital installation Delight Garden materialize in the space as analog miniature sculptures—3D-printed relics that function as contemporary votive offerings or a fragmented anthology of ancestral symbols, resurfaced and “re-fleshed” from the digital realm. As the exhibition’s manifesto describes, these sculptural characters—both digital and material—exist in a fluid techno-temporal transition, “within the interstice, the glitch, the fold.” They reappear in a video work that constructs a virtual museum: part ritual archive, part myth-making machine, collapsing boundaries between memory and projection, analog matter and digital creation. Downstairs, in a space specifically designed for digital art, a longer video expands this cosmology, accompanied by bone-like sculptures and imagined fossils—artifacts of a porous exchange between physical and virtual, past and present, reality and possibility.

Meanwhile, an excerpt from Amantai’s visionary poem Bolmahan appears on one of the gallery walls in Chinese, English and Kazakh—the author’s native language—accompanied by a printed volume and a sound recording. Peng told Observer that the intention was to bring something even more human into dialogue with technology. Through the layered voices of poetry and ancestral fiction, Amantai embarks on a profound meditation on the nature of humanity from a no-place called Bolmahan—a name that means “Never Existed”—where utopia remains possible, imagined beyond the confines of physical reality.

The experience culminates in an immersive performance conceived by Brooklyn-based director Katherine Wilkinson and writer Elizagrace Madrone, who transform the venue into an imagined archaeological site of the future. Here, guests become explorers, uncovering the evolving relationship between art, technology and the human body. Rooted in the concept of the body as both terrain and canvas, the piece invites audiences into a poetic, participatory journey shaped by movement and storytelling.

“Becoming Things, Becoming Time / Bolmahan at Delight Garden” is the first exhibition in a four-show series. Artech Art Foundation

Operating across dimensions and disciplines is essential for Zeng, whose goal is to build initiatives that move simultaneously through the physical and digital, blending material and immaterial, tradition and innovation, fiction and reality. “We want to create a global first: we call it multi-module art,” Zeng said. “Multi-module means combining something one can experience in the physical world, like a painting or sculpture, with the digital space and dimension; we’re using A.I. to generate a lot of content.”

Crucially, this interplay between online and offline, digital and physical, extends far beyond the act of creation. It encompasses the entire life cycle of a work: its exchange, distribution and experience. “We want to establish a complete ecosystem—something that no gallery or museum has achieved to date,” he added. At its core, Artech envisions a value chain that functions seamlessly across both physical and digital realms, while embedding itself within vertical applications. As artistic expression increasingly integrates technological innovation and ventures into digital frontiers, Zeng asserted, a new infrastructure becomes necessary—what he calls ABM, or integrating A.I., blockchain and the metaverse. In this framework, A.I. aids the creation of art, blockchain secures its tokenization as equity and the metaverse unlocks new modes of distribution.

His ambition is to construct an interdisciplinary platform that brings together artists, philosophers and creatives alongside financial experts and impact investors—united in a process of co-creation that aims to ‘engineer’ new theories and visions for the future of humanity, while also reflecting on the arc of civilization. Artech could be at once a platform, a forum, an incubator and a marketplace—situated at the nexus of technology, finance and art and built to support this collective pursuit of reimagining the human condition and charting alternative futures.

Artech positions digital art within a serious infrastructure for experimentation, co-creation and cross-disciplinary dialogue. Artech Art Foundation

“If art is the soul of time and technology the engine of revolution,” Zeng said, then this first exhibition is merely the opening chapter of a broader initiative—one that aims to engage approximately 144 artists and creatives from its earliest stages. The ambition is not just to present art as commentary, but to establish a network and incubator capable of addressing the urgent challenges facing humanity today, using artistic practice as a roadmap for further human evolution beyond mere survival.

To realize this vision, the foundation has established two expert committees tasked with selecting participating artists. However, Zeng’s overarching goal is to grow the project into an open-source platform that operates simultaneously online and offline. Through a DAO (decentralized autonomous organization), participants will eventually vote on the artists they believe are most compelling for this next phase. “This is just phase one. On May 8, we launched the infrastructure. We’re launching the roadmap. But eventually, we’ll invite artists from around the world to co-create—across nations, generations, cultures and religions,” he explained. The ambition is vast, and the project appears to have both the funding and structural foundation to pursue much of what Zeng envisions. Although Artech’s first show signals a departure from the entertainment-driven, immersive digital spectacles seen in recent experimental ventures, a question remains: will the traditional art world embrace it?

At the heart of Artech is a belief that the merging of physical and digital experience can inspire radical rethinking of the human condition. Artech Art Foundation



Source link

Despite Quiet Bidding, Christie’s Evening Sales Brought in $489M

Adrien Meyer sells the top lot of the 20th Century Evening Sale, Monet’s Peupliers au bord de l’Epte, crépuscule, for $43 million. Courtesy Christie’s

The marquee auctions may not have opened with much excitement—especially if this week is meant to test the pulse of the market—but Christie’s highly anticipated sale of the Leonard & Louise Riggio Collection and its 20th Century Evening auction proceeded with muted bidding and minimal risk, ultimately delivering solid results: a combined $489 million total, with 99 percent sold by lot and 98 percent by value across both sales.

Guarantees and irrevocable bids were clearly doing the heavy lifting last night, with more than half the lots already locked in by hefty third-party backing. Notably, despite the auction week kicking off just a day after the U.S. and China agreed to suspend their reciprocal, absurdly high tariffs that almost resulted in a trade embargo, bidding from Asia was largely absent; most works ultimately went to buyers in the U.S. or Europe.

SEE ALSO: Ten Highlights From New York’s Spring Marquee Auctions

The evening opened with thirty-seven lots from the collection of Barnes & Noble founder Leonard Riggio and his wife, Louise, the longtime chair of Dia Art Foundation. To secure what proved to be the most significant consignment of the past 12 months, Christie’s played it safe, offering the estate an undisclosed guarantee and mitigating risk through irrevocable bids and third-party backers. The strategy paid off: the sale achieved a solid 97 percent sell-through rate, totaling $272 million against a $252-326 million estimate. Yet in practice, most of the lots appeared to follow the script, with top works landing discreetly on the phone with Alex Rotter, recently named global chairman, while saleroom activity remained notably subdued.

Piet Mondrian, Composition with Large Red Plane, Bluish Gray, Yellow, Black and Blue, 1922. Courtesy Christie’s

This was true even for one of the evening’s stars: Piet Mondrian’s Composition No. III, with Red, Blue, Yellow, and Black (1929), a rare square composition of exceptional quality and one of the few of its kind not already held by a museum. Starting at $34 million, it hammered swiftly on Rotter’s phone for $41 million ($47.6 million with fees), falling shy of Mondrian’s previous $51 million auction record. A similar fate befell René Magritte’s L’empire des lumières, a coveted example from the artist’s most sought-after series. Despite its distinguished provenance (formerly owned by both the Rockefellers before the Riggio family) it attracted only a few incremental bids, selling once again via Rotter’s phone line for $31 million hammer ($34.9 million with fees), the same price it achieved at Christie’s last year. The result paled in comparison to the $121.1 million fetched by Maja Hoffmann’s larger version from the same series in November, which set a record for both Magritte and any Surrealist work at auction. Both the Mondrian and the Magritte were almost certainly absorbed by their guarantors—an outcome Rotter neatly summed up as “the art market in the real world.”

Across the board, most works landed within estimate ranges or slightly below when measured by hammer price rather than premium-inclusive totals. The first lot to hit the block from the Riggio collection was a compelling Portrait de jeune homme by Balthus, previously on view at MoMA. Starting at $1.5 million, it climbed with minimal momentum to $2.7 million hammer ($3.34 million with fees), settling midway within its estimate. That pattern held through many of the sale’s elegant Giacometti sculptures. Le Couple, a lifetime bronze cast formerly shown at MoMA, opened at $2 million and hammered quickly at $3.5 million with Giovanna Bertazzoni on the phone. The standout Femme de Venise sold briskly in the room for $15 million ($17.66 million with fees), again landing squarely within its $15-17 million estimate only once the premium was factored in. The psychologically charged Annette Nu dans l’atelier also barely scraped its low estimate at $7 million hammer ($8.46 million with fees). All three Giacomettis were backed by third-party guarantees, which was likely a key factor in securing their sales.

Andy Warhol, The Last Supper, 1986. Courtesy Christie’s

A rare burst of energy came with Picasso’s vibrant portrait of Lee Miller, which made its auction debut and achieved $28 million after fees. Otherwise, the remainder of the Riggio trove—including works with museum provenance and strong exhibition history—proceeded predictably, generally meeting expectations and closing to estimates only once premiums were counted. Magritte’s Les droits de l’homme sold for $15.9 million (estimate: $15-20 million), while Rothko’s moody Untitled closed with minimal bidding just above its low estimate at $8.46 million with fees. Fernand Léger’s Les trois personnages devant le jardin, a close sibling to a version held by the Met, sold for $8.1 million with premium, only slightly above the low end of its estimate. A monumental Barbara Hepworth, acquired directly from the artist’s estate, also stuck to the center of its range at $8 million, while Warhol’s electric blue Last Supper sold quietly for $7.07 million on the phone with Christie’s head of advisory.

By the end of the evening, enthusiasm had noticeably thinned. Less desirable lots slipped well below expectations—including a more challenging work like Stan Douglas’s A Luta Continua (1974), which sold for just $12,600 with fees against a $60,000-80,000 estimate, and Ed Ruscha’s Johnny Tomorrow, which hammered at $800,000, falling short of its $1.5 million estimate even after fees. On the more contemporary end of the spectrum, the few artists included in the trove just barely scraped past their low estimates once premiums were added. The two Kerry James Marshall works sold for $3,801,000 and $2,591,000, respectively, while the museum-quality Glenn Ligon—despite being previously featured in the Whitney Biennial—encountered thin bidding and closed at $2,833,000 with fees, against its $2.5-3.5 million estimate.

A similar trend continued in the second half of the night with the 37-lot 20th Century Evening Sale, which closed with white-glove results, achieving a $217 million total and 100 percent sold by value, but only after the sudden withdrawal of one of the top lots, Andy Warhol’s Big Electric Chair (1967-68), which likely failed to find a buyer due to its challenging subject matter, particularly for such high (undisclosed) asking price in the region of $30 million.

The sale opened with nine top-tier abstract works from the estate of Anne Bass. Here, too, guarantees and irrevocable bids played a central role, not only in securing the prestigious consignment but in ensuring solid results, most often within estimate. The first lot, Gino Severini’s Danseuse, with its dynamism of forms and colors and all the energies of futurism, successfully brought a flash of excitement to the room, landing after a flurry of bidding at $2.6 million ($3,196,000 after premium), squeaking by its $2.5 million high estimate. Momentum continued with Alexander Calder’s elegant white mobile, which achieved $8.46 million with fees—just over its $8 million top estimate.

Gino Severini, Danseuse, 1915-1916. Courtesy Christie’s

Several works followed the same tight trajectory. Morris Louis brought in $2.47 million, the first of Frank Stella’s Itata paintings reached $7.07 million and two Agnes Martins sold within expectations at $4.89 million and $1.62 million, respectively. Even the stunning Ellsworth Kelly abstract composition sold almost instantly for $3.7 million with premium, most likely landing with its guarantor. More surprising was the muted reception for the evening’s centerpiece, Rothko’s vibrating purple painting from 1952—also exhibited in MoMA’s historic “15 Americans” show—which hammered at $32.5 million, under its on-request estimate of $35 million. Only after buyer’s premium did it reach $37.79 million, technically clearing expectations but hardly commanding the room.

One of the few lots to spark genuine competition was Frank Stella’s Firuzabad III (1970), a large shaped canvas of two interlocking circles. After an energetic battle between four phone bidders, it hammered at $2.7 million ($3.37 million with fees), well above its $2 million high estimate. But the evening’s most sustained bidding war came later with Claude Monet’s Peupliers au bord de l’Epte, crépuscule, which, after more than five minutes of tense back-and-forth between phones, hammered at $37 million ($42.96 million with fees), setting a new record for the artist’s Peupliers series. The work—offered for the first time after being owned by the same family for three generations—had been on long-term loan to the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

SEE ALSO: Maria Brito On Why Smart Collectors Are Still Buying—and What They’re Skipping

Elsewhere, Gerhard Richter’s moody Korsika landscape defied its grey tones to achieve a bright result: $15.25 million, well above its $9-12 million estimate. The sale also underscored collectors’ growing enthusiasm for visionary surrealists: Dorothea Tanning’s uncanny Endgame brought $2.35 million (estimate: $1-1.5 million) and Remedios Varo’s Revelación (El relojero) hit $6.22 million, setting a new auction record for the artist. Near the close, a surprise came with Franz von Stuck’s Die Sünde, which doubled expectations to reach $604,800. Previously held in the collection of the Prince of Serbia, the work achieved a new record for a work on paper by the Successionist artist.

Mark Rothko, No. 4 (Two Dominants) (Orange, Plum, Black), 1950-1951. Courtesy Christie’s

Still, not all was sunny. In the latter portion of the sale, some works fell well short of expectations. Lucio Fontana’s cosmic Concetto spaziale, In piazza San Marco di notte con Teresita—a glittering combination of glass and paint—sold for $7.54 million, less than half of the $14 million it brought at auction in 2017. Whether this signals a shift in fortune for the Argentinian artist or simply a too-ambitious estimate, the spotlight now turns to Fine di Dio, a radiant gold canvas from Daniella Luxembourg’s collection, which will test Fontana’s market again at Sotheby’s on May 14.

Overall, the first night of auction week confirmed what insiders already suspected: the market is a long way from its once-upon-a-time fireworks. With caution in the air, auction houses are playing it safer and smarter, leaning on strategy and heavy guarantees to offset risk and keep the spectacle alive. The show continues tonight, May 13, with Sotheby’s Modern Evening Auction and Phillips’ Modern & Contemporary Art Evening Sale.



Source link

A Major Survey Spotlights Marisol’s Sculptural Explorations of Self and Society

An installation view of “Marisol: A Retrospective.” Photo: Brad Flowers | Courtesy Dallas Museum Of Art

“My work is sculpture, figurative, life size, and socially conscious”—that’s how Venezuelan-born American sculptor Marisol Escobar (1930-2016) once described her practice. Though she emerged alongside the pop art movement and shared certain aesthetic and conceptual affinities with both Pop and New Realism, the mononymous artist offered a distinctly feminine and more personal lens on those themes. Her work translated social commentary into intimate reflection, probing the meaning of human existence in a rapidly shifting global society shaped by consumerism, mass production, and media saturation.

Recently the subject of renewed critical and institutional attention, Marisol is now honored with a major survey at the Dallas Museum of Art that offers a timely opportunity to revisit her singular vision and complex biography. Meanwhile, her market has experienced a considerable yet steady revival, with her most recent auction record set in 2021, when her 1962 sculpture The Family sold for $912,500 (with fees) at Phillips New York during their 20th Century & Contemporary Art Evening Sale, significantly surpassing its $500,000 high estimate. Traveling from the Buffalo AKG Art Museum—where the artist bequeathed her estate—this retrospective stands as a long-overdue tribute to the originality and emotional depth of her work, which will likely further its appreciation in the market realm as well.

Following the success of her first solo show at Leo Castelli Gallery in New York in 1957, which included many of the works now on view, Marisol promptly departed for Rome—as if instinctively fleeing the success and attention that followed the exhibition. Presenting something so radically different from what American audiences were used to seeing, she blended meticulous handcraft with diaristic yet psychologically incisive observations of human behavior. “How can you leave when things are just beginning?” Marisol didn’t listen; she went away for more than a year.

It wouldn’t be the first or last time Marisol escaped, overwhelmed by the stifling atmosphere of the New York art world and its market expectations. She always guarded her voice, using sculpture as a tool for personal and social inquiry—a medium for relentless observation of humanity, approached with both curiosity and detachment. After all, she had grown up in motion: though born in Paris, her family returned to Venezuela around 1935, and her early years were marked by constant travel between New York and Caracas. That cultural duality not only shaped her identity but also informed her singular artistic sensibility.

Organized by the Buffalo AKG Art Museum, to which the artist bequeathed her estate in 2016, the exhibition is the artist’s most significant retrospective to date. Photo: Brad Flowers | Courtesy Dallas Museum Of Art

Marisol famously rejected the “Pop” label even when embracing it might have boosted her popularity and sales, choosing instead to make her work more elusive, more psychological. She used her own image, quite literally, to interrogate selfhood as a construct shaped by a complex web of relations with the surrounding society. As she once remarked of her own practice, “I looked at my faces, all different in wood, and asked, ‘Who am I?’”

Having spent much of her life as an immigrant, Marisol often wrote of feeling she didn’t belong anywhere—and, at the same time, that she belonged everywhere. In one diary entry, she quipped, “I am a Venezuelan, born in France, living in Italy—that has an English car with North American plates and Swiss insurance—and they want to ask me what nationality I am.”

When she returned to New York in 1960, her work underwent a transformation, marked by sharper societal commentary and the emergence of new life-size, haunting assemblages that quickly captivated the American public with their fusion of art historical tradition, craft and psychological acuity.

SEE ALSO: These Are the Spring Season’s Must-See Museum Shows

Her 1962 debut at Stable Gallery marked a pivotal moment. The Buffalo AKG Art Museum (then the Albright-Knox Art Gallery) was the first institution to acquire one of her sculptures, and a feature in LIFE’s “Red-Hot Hundred” list catapulted her visibility well beyond the confines of the art world. At the core of these works lay a profound societal and personal reflection on the role of women: often using life-size plaster casts of her own face and hands, Marisol enacted a continual performance of embodiment and disembodiment—inhabiting, exposing and ultimately dismantling social stereotypes. “No one has deflated human pomposity with greater insight,” wrote critic and curator Katherine Kuh in 1963. Marisol’s work offered a sincere portrait of the individual within society as fractured, multiplied and performative—dispelling the illusion of the social masquerade and any prepackaged, self-mythologizing narrative.

Her totemic portraits associated with Pop art from the 1960s established her as a major artistic figure of her generation. Photo: Brad Flowers | Courtesy Dallas Museum Of Art

Despite Pop Art reaching its peak and her work having every chance to rise with that wave, Marisol instead delved even deeper into her psycho-sociological observations of the society around her—perhaps sharpened by the cultural jolt of returning from Europe, where the lifestyle and mindset felt far more aligned with her Latino sensibility. Themes of sexuality, identity, Cold War anxiety and migration came to the fore. Her figures were crafted to entertain at first glance, only to subvert viewers’ expectations upon closer inspection, mirroring the very mechanics of social interaction.

Among the most emblematic works on view is The Jazz Wall, a commissioned mural for the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery. Honoring eighteen legendary jazz musicians who helped shape American music and culture, the mural is both a celebration of Black American musical brilliance and a critique of its historical marginalization. It underscores the multicultural foundations that nourished U.S. cultural identity and evolution.

Though she resisted spectacle, Marisol briefly became a fashion icon in 1960s New York. One reviewer referred to her “celebratable face”—she was regularly featured in Glamour, Harper’s Bazaar and Vogue, and was momentarily crowned the quintessential party girl of Manhattan’s downtown social scene. A regular presence at Warhol’s Factory, she was famously dubbed by the artist “the first girl artist with glamour” and cast in two of his 1964 films: Kiss and The 13 Most Beautiful Women.

At the same time, Marisol’s incorporation of found objects and mass-produced fabrics gave her three-dimensional humanoid figures a tactile, near-palpable presence. In an era enthralled by mechanical reproduction, her commitment to handcraft was both radical and quietly restorative.

Some of her works from the 1960s read as even more diaristic and introspective, confronting existential questions around the societal expectations placed on women. Amplifying the mid-century ideal of infantile cuteness to eerie, uncanny extremes, her “hateful giant infants,” “cloying but malevolent monsters,” became metaphors for unfulfilled motherhood, infantilized femininity and American imperialism: always clamoring, always consuming.

Iconic works include her masterpiece The Party (1965-1966), an assemblage of fifteen life-size, free-standing figures, all bearing Marisol’s facial features. Photo: Brad Flowers | Courtesy Dallas Museum Of Art

At the height of her fame in 1968, Marisol represented Venezuela with a solo exhibition at the Venice Biennale and was one of only four women among 149 artists selected for that year’s prestigious documenta in Kassel, Germany. Her Venice pavilion was populated by hybrid creatures—part human, part animal—anticipating today’s discourse around interspecies relations and the fluid interdependence between humans and the natural world. Disillusioned by the omnipresence of U.S. global militarism, she sought refuge in an imagined aquatic realm, a physical and symbolic withdrawal from terrestrial violence.

By the mid-1970s, her work had taken an overtly political turn, as seen in a series of large, vivid colored-pencil studies depicting dismembered bodies and explosive forms that grappled with the trauma of state violence and the psychological toll of militarization. At the same time, she turned her sharp, satirical gaze toward political figures, much like she had with society women in earlier works—laying bare their absurdity, fragility, and fractured personas against the backdrop of systemic brutality.

In the 1970s, Marisol began crafting a series of homages to artists she admired: Martha Graham, Pablo Picasso, Marcel Duchamp, Georgia O’Keeffe and Willem de Kooning among them. This more realistic (and arguably more conventional) body of work culminated in the 1981 exhibition “Artists and Artistes by Marisol” at Sidney Janis Gallery. Though more digestible in tone, the show earned her renewed institutional attention, including a solo exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C., “Magical Mixtures: Marisol Portrait Sculpture” in 1991. It also opened the door to a new chapter of large-scale public commissions, resulting in a series of monuments dedicated to historical figures, many of which were installed at prominent sites in Venezuela.

From the 1970s on, the artist’s work is marked by her commitment to issues including environmental precarity, social justice, feminism and war. Photo: Brad Flowers | Courtesy Dallas Museum Of Art

Toward the end of the exhibition, we encounter how Marisol, in her later works, ventured into a more critical engagement with the traditional genre of the public monument. Subverting the very notion of the “victor’s statue,” she chose instead to memorialize the marginalized and oppressed, representing figures from former colonies such as India, Cuba and Bangladesh, as well as from North American Indigenous communities. In doing so, she offered a poignant counter-history in three dimensions.

Among these more socially conscious and politically charged works is Marisol’s final sculptural reflection on the era-defining events of the 1960s: a piece she completed in 1996 that revisits the 1963 funeral of President John F. Kennedy. But instead of monumental grandeur, she focused on a small, haunting detail—his young son saluting the coffin. “I was touched by the expression on his face,” Marisol recalled. “A despair that usually children do not have.” And yet that small figure carries immense weight: a child, a gesture, a nation in mourning.

With this work, Marisol left a final testament to her belief in sculpture not as a monument to power but as a mirror of the self. Approaching the medium through a deeply humanistic lens, she used it not to glorify or manipulate history, but to illuminate the fragile, flickering human presence within and behind it. Marisol’s sculptural oeuvre stands today as a tool for confronting emotional, psychological and moral vulnerability—of the individual facing existence, both alone and in society—particularly in those turbulent, disorienting times when humanity seems to have lost any stable reference point, any shared belief, or higher ideal to hold onto.

The retrospective features loans of major works from institutions like the Museum of Modern Art, the Guggenheim Abu Dhabi and the Art Institute of Chicago. Photo: Brad Flowers | Courtesy Dallas Museum Of Art



Source link

TEFAF Delivers Museum Quality—and Sales—Despite Market Uncertainty

Strong sales showcased TEFAF’s continued ability to attract sophisticated buyers across multiple collecting categories. Photo: Jitske Nap

The energy on opening night was palpable, according to TEFAF New York director Leanne Jagtiani. “No matter how consistent it is year after year, I’m always dazzled by the quality of work our exhibitors bring to the Armory,” she told Observer. “Walking through the booths, you could sense the enthusiasm—exhibitors clearly felt the vibrant energy of the crowd and were engaged in meaningful conversation.” Indeed, some dealers reported near-immediate sales, and others quickly found themselves in deep talks with promising collectors. And while murmurs about a champagne shortage and swapped-out tulips were read by some as signs of austerity, the fair once again affirmed its standing as the premier marketplace for the exceptional, regardless of the economic climate.

SEE ALSO: Frieze and NADA New York’s Early Sales Signaled Buyer Confidence

David Zwirner opened the fair with a solo presentation of elegantly suspended sculptures by Ruth Asawa, accompanied by a series of works on paper that captured her poetic and process-driven approach with quiet precision. Reflecting a deep engagement with nature, geometry and process-based making, Asawa looped wire into ethereal, biomorphic tridimensional crochet, challenging the boundaries between sculpture, craft and drawing while exploring the relationship between space and form, light and shadow. The gallery sold four sculptures priced between $320,000 and $2.8 million and six works on paper priced between $50,000 and $160,000.

Ruth Asawa at David Zwirner’s booth. © 2025 Ruth Asawa Lanier, Inc. Courtesy David Zwirner

That same day, Ortuzar Projects, in collaboration with Marc Selwyn Fine Art, sold Lee Bontecou’s iconic Untitled (1959) for a price reportedly in the $2 million range. The museum-quality presentation highlighted Bontecou’s visionary fusion of postwar anxiety and cosmic wonder—her signature machine-organic hybrids forged from industrial detritus. Evoking both space probes and bodily voids, Bontecou’s cratered forms exist somewhere between lunar landscapes and anatomical maps, channeling a haunting new relationship between humanity and the cosmos.

Meanwhile, Thaddaeus Ropac reported rapid sales of nearly every Daniel Richter canvas in the fair’s first few hours. Two large oil paintings—sperlingskleine WEISE (2024) and Triumph des Höhnischen—each surpassed $470,000. “It’s been an extremely busy opening, perhaps even more so than last year,” said the Austrian dealer, noting the “very positive response” to Richter’s new paintings from TEFAF’s reliably sophisticated and informed buyer base.

SEE ALSO: The Art Market Defies Doom and Gloom at Independent, Esther and Future Fair

Standing out for both quality and curatorial strength was Robilant Voena’s booth, which included a monumental pink Andy Warhol tribute to celebrities, Myths (Multiple) (1981), in dialogue with a rare and graceful brass sculpture by Melotti, three rare Fucsia slashes and a fourth work by Lucio Fontana, along with ceramics by the Argentinian pioneer of space and matter. “We are very happy with the attendance of our clients and collectors! TEFAF has also been incremental in supporting our presence in New York, especially as we have reopened our new gallery close by,” commented Robilant Voena. “We have seen a healthy mix of American and European attendees.”

Another long-time exhibitor at TEFAF, the London- and Italy-based gallery Cardi reportedly placed several works with American collectors, including historical pieces such as Piero Manzoni’s Achrome (1962), priced above $330,000; Agostino Bonalumi’s Bianco (1989), with an asking price of $120,000; and décollages by Mimmo Rotella, each listed at $55,000. The gallery also sold two works by contemporary Italian-born, New York–based artist Davide Balliano for $35,000 each—he will have a solo exhibition at Tina Kim gallery in the coming months. “In this particular moment, I felt collectors’ response was both responsible and solid—they’ve slyly returned to the market, sensing this is a buy moment,” gallery owner Nicolo Cardi told Observer. By Monday, the gallery had also placed works by Josef Albers and Raymond Pettibon and had a Richard Serra and a Mimmo Paladino on reserve.

Tornabuoni Arte—an Italian gallery and TEFAF veteran specializing in postwar masterpieces—also reported strong sales to new buyers from the U.S. and Europe, including a metaphysical piazza by Giorgio De Chirico, an embroidery and ballpoint pen airplane work by Alighiero Boetti, a poetic piece by Claudio Parmiggiani and a work by Mimmo Rotella, while a striking white Lucio Fontana remains on hold.

Robilant + Voena’s offerings. Robilant & Voena

Some of the offerings at TEFAF also aligned intriguingly with the upcoming spring marquee auctions. As Barbara Gladstone’s personal collection heads to the block—led by Richard Prince’s iconic Nurse—the series made a parallel return across the fairs: Gana Art from Seoul presented a Masquerade Nurse from the 2000s, originally acquired from Gladstone’s collection in 2014 by a Korean collector and now offered with a $5.5 million price tag. Gladstone Gallery brought works from the dealer’s private holdings, including a suite of George Condo drawings, most of which were acquired directly from the artist and had never been seen on the market before. The gallery swiftly placed forty-five of them, with prices ranging from $15,000 to $150,000.

While TEFAF New York leans toward the modern and contemporary, it wasn’t all blue-chip masterworks. Sprüth Magers showcased a new series of bronze reliefs by Anne Imhof, translating her visceral, performance-based explorations of the body, identity and societal tension into a material language rooted in permanence. Returning to the Park Avenue Armory after her unforgettable live performance, DOOM, Imhofs Untitled (Silas) (2024) sold to a private U.S. collection for €250,000. A suite of drawings from her Cerberus series (2024), mapping the tension between human and animal, gesture and emotion, also went to a European collector.

Quite timely with the daily news, Leon Tovar was offering a large-scale, humorous Fernando Botero portrayal of a pope, El Nuncio (1987). León Tovar, owner of the gallery, expressed his excitement about the unexpected alignment, describing it as a “magical coincidence.” The curatorial concept of their booth this year was inspired by the movie Conclave and the idea of unification, with other works by Latino masters such as Rufino Tamayo and Wifredo Lam. “It is just a magical coincidence; Pope Francis dies, an American pope is elected, and here we have this impressive work by Botero, which represents precisely that link between art and spirituality,” Tovar said. The painting had an asking price in the $3 million range.

Meanwhile, as its two galleries stage museum-quality exhibitions devoted to modern and contemporary masters, Gagosian dedicated its entire TEFAF booth to a solo presentation of works by the talented young figurative painter—and Larry’s former girlfriend—Anna Weyant. By the end of opening day, the gallery had reportedly placed Spring Florals, a large-scale canvas priced at $300,000, along with eight intimately scaled new paintings priced at $90,000 each. Depicting jewelry items such as pearl bracelets, gold chains and daisy pendants rendered inside jewelry boxes with minimal detail, these trompe l’oeil works—explicitly conceived for the fair—created a tidy visual dialogue with the rest of the presentation. In the end, though, they read more as virtuosic exercises in decorative hyperrealism than meaningful critiques of consumerism, despite their conceptual pretense.

Anna Weyant, Pearl Bracelet (Sold), 2025; Oil on canvas, 8 1/4 x 8 1/4 inches. © Anna Weyant Photo: Maris Hutchinson Courtesy Gagosian

Kasmin also reported the sale of a group of works spanning a broad price range—from Yves Klein’s iconic La Victoire de Samothrace, sold for $17,500, and a gelatin silver print of his memorable performance Leap Into the Void, October 27, for $35,000, to Janaina Tschäpe’s oil stick on canvas Summer thoughts (2025), sold for $95,000. Additional placements included a pencil and charcoal on paper by Jannis Kounellis priced at $25,000, two Hugo McCloud oil paintings at $115,000 each and Mariko Mori’s crystal-like sculpture Plasma Stone II (2017-2018), sold for $325,000.

Similarly strong on the contemporary side was White Cube, which placed Tracey Emin’s visceral You please me (2022) for nearly $400,000, a group of Julie Mehretu’s etchings for $250,000 and Ed Ruscha’s acrylic on canvas Brave Men Study I (1995).

Among the standout works, Galerie Lefebvre presented a stunning Amedeo Modigliani drawing—a distilled formal study of the human head, clearly inspired by African masks and Cycladic sculpture. Originally conceived as a sketch for a lost 1911 sculpture, the work now stands as the sole surviving testament to this level of synthesis and mastery in Modigliani’s practice. During the preview, the dealer confided to Observer that, given the response at the fair confirming its rarity and power, he was seriously considering keeping it for himself. Another gem: a vibrant 1984 Jean-Michel Basquiat on a blue background at Van de Weghe’s booth, shown alongside miniature works by Alexander Calder and Henry Moore—and a floor piece by Carl Andre that fairgoers kept unwittingly stepping on, too distracted by the overall quality of the presentation to notice.

A notable presence in Salon 94’s booth was the work of Aboriginal artist Mantua Nangala, whose market and institutional presence has surged in recent years. Her intricate acrylic-on-linen dot paintings visualize the sacred landscape of Marrapinti in the Gibson Desert, translating ancestral Dreaming stories into rhythmic, almost cartographic compositions that link micro and macro worlds. Priced around $80,000 each, they offer a contemporary language for inherited knowledge—anchored in tradition but speaking fluently to today’s global art stage. The gallery also sold several works by Alev Ebüzziya Siesbye and Mitsuko Asakura in the $40,000-90,000 range.

Meanwhile, Richard Saltoun spotlighted generations of pioneering fiber artists from across geographies, with standouts including wall tapestries by Magdalena Abakanowicz—one originally featured in the seminal 1969 MoMA exhibition “Wall Hangings”—and a luminous gold piece by Olga de Amaral, timed to coincide with her evening auction debut and a major show at Fondation Cartier. Lisson Gallery, instrumental in building De Amaral’s international market, also placed her Tierra y fibra 3 (1988) alongside Sean Scully’s Wall Tappan Deep Red (2025) for $500,000, Dalton Paula’s Zacimba Gaba (2025) for $200,000 and Kelly Akashi’s Be Me (A Thousand Flowers) (2021) for $50,000, following her memorable recent show at the gallery during last Frieze Los Angeles.

TEFAF runs through May 13. Photo: Jitske Nap

Here, the demand for Impressionist masters remains strong. David Tunick sold a Cézanne double-sided portrait drawing of the artist’s only son in the six-figure price range. Also in the early days of the fair, French dealer Almine Rech sold a delightfully feminine portrait of a woman by Marie Laurencin—priced between $300,000 and $350,000—a figure who was extremely active within the same Parisian artistic circles of the early 20th Century but has only recently been reconsidered by the market. Rech also placed works by Ali Cherri ($150,000-170,000), Zio Ziegler ($55,000-70,000), Inès Longevial ($40,000-50,000), a new painting by Chloe Wise ($25,000-30,000) and one work by Dylan Solomon Kraus ($20,000-25,000).

As TEFAF remains a stage for both discoveries and rediscoveries, one of the most remarkable inclusions in this year’s edition is a recently resurfaced portrait of an African prince by Gustav Klimt, long thought lost during World War II. Presented by Vienna’s Wienerroither & Kohlbacher Gallery with a €15 million price tag, the extraordinary painting underwent meticulous cleaning, confirming its prestigious attribution. Believed to have remained with Klimt until it hit the block at Vienna’s Samuel Kende auction house in 1923 with a starting price of 15,000 crowns, the work was likely acquired by Ernestine Klein and her husband, a wine wholesaler, as referenced in records from a 1928 “Secession” exhibition—its last known public appearance. The Kleins fled Austria in 1938 as the Nazis took power, living secretly in Monaco and likely leaving the painting behind. It remained unaccounted for until its recent resurfacing and is now back on the market, following a restitution settlement with Ernestine Klein’s heirs.

This year, ninety-one 91 dealers and galleries from thirteen countries and four continents brought their best to New York City. Photo: Jitske Nap

TEFAF, unfortunately, was likely the spring art fair hit hardest by the new tariffs, with dealers facing added costs and bureaucratic complications, particularly in categories like design, antiquities and jewelry, which were present in smaller numbers compared to the Maastricht edition. Still, true quality triumphed over red tape. Friedman Benda sold a unique Wendell Castle piece from 1966 on the first day, while Didier Ltd, a gallery specializing in artist-designed jewelry, quickly placed a seductive gold pendant medallion featuring a sunken-relief rampant bull by Pablo Picasso—made in collaboration with his dentist, Dr. Philippe Châtaignier—as well as a textured gold pendant with a red enamel bird by Georges Braque.

On the antiquities side, a particular standout was the Roman head of a bearded god from the 2nd century AD presented by Charles Ede. The sculpture was striking for its expressive realism: heavily lidded eyes gaze forward with incised irises and drilled crescent pupils, offering a rare glimpse of classical naturalism at the height of the Roman Empire—a period marked by peace, prosperity, imperial stability and cultural grandeur. Meanwhile, David Aron Ltd presented two fascinating Cycladic Venus sculptures, powerful and essential representations of femininity. In the early days of the fair, the gallery also sold a remarkable hollow-cast bronze Horus Falcon dated to the Late Egyptian Period—a time when the falcon’s symbolism carried deep religious and artistic meaning, tied to the god revered as the unifier and protector of the nation. The piece came to market with prestigious provenance, having once belonged to the celebrated Swedish art historian and collector Dr. Emil Hultmark. Another standout in the booth was a set of Corsican bronze objects from the late Bronze Age (circa 900 B.C.), discovered near Ajaccio between 1800 and 1890. The set contains three bow fibulae, including the largest with a typical violin-bow form, together with a dagger, a uniform bronze (likely a belt buckle), a pommel, a disc—possibly part of a horse harness or brooch—and three simple rings that may have been used as a form of proto-currency.

Overall, TEFAF’s steady activity across price points reflects a U.S. art market that is still one of the most fertile grounds for high-end sales. Increasingly selective, American collectors are buying, but only when a work delivers true quality and exceptionality—this fair’s bread and butter.



Source link

Bar Bianchi Brings a Taste of Milanese Aperitivo Culture to the East Village

Bar Bianchi is bringing a taste of Milan to the East Village. Courtesy Liz Clayman

From the pocket-sized, sultry Elvis in Nolita to the effortlessly chic Tabac-inspired wine bar Le Dive in Dimes Square, Golden Age Hospitality founder Jon Neidich has proven he’s fluid in French cool-factor. It flows through his repertoire of downtown restaurants and bars, including The Nines and Monsieur. And with the opening of Bar Bianchi, a Milanese-style aperitivo in the East Village, Neidich proves he can speak Italian It-boy, too. 

Aperitivo is the quintessential Italian pastime of gathering at local bars and cafés over drinks and complimentary snacks (“spuntini”) in the evening. It comes from the word “aperire,” meaning to open one’s senses and appetite before dinner, and is part of the fabric of Italian culture. Having lived in Milano, I am fastidious about American restaurants serving aperitivi authentically, and arrived at Bar Bianchi as one of its first official patrons to see whether it would. 

For an indoor-outdoor bar to really ooze Italian, the weather needs to cooperate. As the wet wind blew sideways down Avenue A on Bar Bianchi’s opening night, it was evident that the establishment would not have any balmy spring sun in its favor this evening. But between the good hospitality from my engaging server (a light-eyed blonde who was once a professional pool player), the Venetian plaster, and walls of green doors lined with hooks begging to be unlatched, it’s still got potential.

Is there anything more Italian than an al fresco spritz? Liz Clayman

In lieu of a piazza bathed in the blush light of dusk, Bar Bianchi has the zippy corner of Avenue A and East Houston. Its al fresco dining tables, barren the night it opened to the public on May 6, are stationed under a long awning and a boldface Bar Bianchi sign that casts red and green neon onto the sidewalk. Inside, the restaurant, which Neidich launched in partnership with Paradise Projects, checks the boxes of a Golden Hospitality hub. It falls somewhere between the picturesque daydream of a Wes Anderson shot (perhaps because it was inspired by Fondazione Prada’s Bar Luce in Milan, designed by the filmmaker) and the drippy velvet glow of Moulin Rouge (not just because Neidich’s last collaboration, Monsieur, was with Baz Luhrmann). 

Reminiscent of 1920s and ‘30s Italian cafés with touches of modernism, Bar Bianchi was designed by Neidich, Golden’s creative director Andrea Johansson and longtime collaborator Sam Buffa, of The Nines and Frenchette. The diamond-checkerboard floor is made from handcrafted clay tiles imported from Italy. Custom millwork is evocative of charming, outdated Italian cafés untouched by time. The light fixtures shift between milky yellow space-age sconces salvaged in the Czech Republic and vintage Italian glass sculptural sconces. The sweeping space is anchored by the long zinc and Formica bar with an aged mirrored wall and an Art Deco canopy.

The interiors are also a nod to Bianchi, the Milan-based bicycle brand. Liz Clayman

It’s clear from the many vintage bicycle posters and the bar’s namesake that Neidich’s first foray into Italian hospitality is also a nod to Bianchi, the Milan-based bicycle brand with an international cult following. Founded by Edoardo Bianchi in 1885, the brand was not only pivotal in the role bicycles played in Italian history, fostering Fausto Coppi’s wins in the 1947 Giro d’Italia and 1949 Tour de France, but also in bicycle mechanics as we know them today. The only missed opportunity to drive home the Bianchi theme was the shade of green selected for the interior—more pistachio than the celeste green that became Bianchi’s quintessential bike color, inspired by his lover Celeste’s favorite sea-foam hue. 

The food and beverage menu (from chef Nicole Gajadhar and Libertine’s Cody Pruitt) is simple, straightforward Italian with a sizable selection of antipasti (ranging $7 to $24) for a seamless aperitivo. Should you make Bar Bianchi a dinner engagement, they also offer a few central Italian pasta dishes, such as cacio e pepe and pappardelle Bolognese, larger piatti (a $26 branzino, $32 steak tagliata or $76 veal Milanese for two) and desserts like affogato, tiramisú, gelato and a chocolate budino.

I went for aperitivo before a dinner reservation in Chelsea and opted for some classic, smaller bites. The prosciutto melone was a highlight. The execution of this dish relies solely on the quality of the prosciutto and the ripeness of the cantaloupe. If sourced well, like Bar Bianchi did, the deep, salty fabric of the aged pig melts into the juicy, sweet slices of melon and the flavors work their magic.

Another testament to sourcing was the tuna tonnato, which was shaved so thin and tenderly it was almost too difficult to pluck from the plate. It was covered in crispy fried capers and a creamy dijon sauce that was a little too heavy-handed; it eclipsed the carpaccio that was otherwise presentable.

The Caprese salad featured mozzarella made in-house daily. It was bright and fresh, with multi-colored cherry tomatoes, olive oil and basil leaves. It was also topped with two stewed tomatoes stripped of their skin. Bursting with sweet flavor, followed by a saturated salinity, my guess is they’re San Marzano. I wished there were more of them.

Bar Bianchi does small bites well. Courtesy Liz Clayman

I also tried the piatti del giorno, a mushroom tortellini in brodo. I was excited to scoop up the pillows of pasta in a traditional capon broth as a cure to the chilly, rainy evening (and the assertive AC blasting inside). The tortellini pocketed the earthy mushroom filling beautifully, but the dish pivoted from tradition with a plated mushroom broth reduction instead of liquid broth in a shallow bowl. 

Most of the food felt true to an Italian aperitivo format and, while not the meal of a lifetime, it is high quality, particularly for the pricing, and warrants a return. Being a bar focused on aperitivo, the drinks are half the equation here. Wines by the glass and bottle, as well as the cocktail list (consisting only of spritz, Negroni and three Bianchi classics), all stay within the confines of Italian borders. First and foremost, for me, is the Aperol Spritz. I ordered a large because it comes in a bubbly goblet that made me feel like I’d landed in the Navigli district of Milano. The drink had the ideal ratio of bitters to prosecco, served with an orange slice and Castelvetrano olive, just how I like it. 

An authentic spritz. Liz Clayman

The defining benchmark for whether Bar Bianchi is truly an aperitivo came down to how the drink was served. Every restaurant in New York with “aperitivo” dusted in chalk across their café display sign has an immediate tell as to whether it’s authentic: olives. I don’t mean the type of marinated olives you order off the menu, but the kind served alongside your vino rosso or refreshingly biting Negroni—often with potato chips, and always on the house. To be honest, I secretly feel accosted by the American service industry when some Italian restaurant calls it aperitivo, and then doles out watery spritzes with no palate-whetting nibbles. In Italy, any aperitivo includes salt-flecked snacks to complement your drink of choice for just a few euros. It’s integral to this cultural tradition that is less about drinking and more about the social experience of opening the appetite before dinner.

At Bar Bianchi, the chips, served at no extra charge, were made in-house, waffle-knit with air pockets for extra crunch. The olives were plump Castelvetrano. There was nowhere to spit the pits, but the cultural accuracy was a win that positions Neidich for another victorious New York bar balancing authenticity and theatrical design. To solidify the success of Bar Bianchi, we’ll have to wait for the weather—once summer spills the crowd onto the street, sweating spuntini and sipping Aperol in the Golden Hospitality-induced glow of Italian etherealism.



Source link

The 10 Best New Restaurants to Check Out in New York City This May

May is a bit of a confusing time in New York, weather-wise: are we indoor people or outdoor people? This means that what you might be craving for dinner on any given night can vacillate wildly, from soups to spritzes. Perhaps it’s no coincidence, then, that this month’s new restaurants are also a bit of a grab-bag. From a burger joint to a multi-course tasting menu, it seems there’s an opening that caters to every sort of diner, regardless of budget or cuisine craving.

And, just like spring, this month is also a time of renewal for restaurants. Not only is the hotly anticipated reopening of Adda finally happening this May, but a long-shuttered Williamsburg institution, JR & Son, is also back in action. And, we’re welcoming the first New York outpost of NADC Burger, which already counts fans in cities like Austin and Denver.

But what quality do all these restaurants have in common? Well, that’s easy: they’re delicious. Plus, we’ve already done the arduous work of whittling down this group to only the can’t-miss places to try this month. Read on to discover the 10 best new restaurants to check out in New York City this May.



Source link